Archive | Uncategorized RSS for this section
March 21, 2016  

Two prescient Blogs from 2014

I was just trawling through some old blogs and I came across two, of which I am pretty proud. Just scroll down the right side of this screen to July 14, 2014 and October 7, 2014 and take a look.

The first is titled School Governance and Governors, and it bemoans the demise of local councillor representation on school governing bodies and the rise of the technocrat. I didn’t know it but it presaged last week’s announcement of the “end” of parent governors. After all parents don’t know anything about running schools, their expertise being merely to have kids and local councillors equally don’t know much about running schools – all they know about it is the local community and the need to plan for school provision and school places. Obviously just the kind of people that Cameron/Osborne would want to kick out of school administration: parents and local representatives! The Tory version is, of course, to have technocrats and the private sector under the pseudo-guise of educational charitable institutions.

The second was titled The Tory Party faces a disaster called Europe. The one thing I got wrong in that blog was the date of the crisis, which I had down for 2017. I didn’t know that Cameron was going to plump for June 23, 2016 as the Referendum Day. I predicted Tory division and disaster and potentially its demise for a generation. I hope that I am right. It is beginning to look that way!

And my punt for 2016? Against all the punditry and all the apparent trends, the economic problems and climate change issues demand a collective solution. So my prediction is that 2016 sees the start of the rejuvenation of social democracy.

March 9, 2016  

Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere March, 2016, Newsletter (# 82)

  

  1. On February 2nd, I was briefed on the plans for, what I called last month, the Tesco block on Falcon Road, though strictly speaFalcon Road CGI2king neither of the two planned retail units are definitely going to be Tescos – that is yet to be decided. The intention is to do a comprehensive re-development, between Khyber and Patience Roads, with retail on the ground floor and four storeys of residential units above. How many of these will be affordable (in the modern jargon definition of affoFalcon Road CGI1rdable) is up for negotiation. These indicative drawings of the development show the intention: it will have an adverse impact on 1-15 Patience Road and maybe on sunlight in 2-8 Patience Road. However, by the standards of some of the giant developments nearby this is unexceptional. OK, I hope you agree.
  2. I went to the SNT Meeting, on 4th February at the George Shearing Centre, in Este Road. SNT is police jargon for the police Special Neighbourhood Team and they have quarterly meetings with a number of local representatives of resident associations and tenant groups, where issues of ”Latchmere interest” are discussed. Unfortunately, because of clashes with other meetings, I often cannot get there. The police told us that there were 8 more crimes in January than there had been in January last year but that there had been a fall of 28 in December compared IMG_1737 (2)with the previous year. The good news is that on the whole the trend across the Borough has, for some years, been downwards.
  3. One minor pleasure of being a councillor for many years is that occasionally someone, usually a student of politics or journalism, wants to come and write an essay based on your experiences. On 10th February, Andri, a  Roehampton student of journalism came along to quiz me on the nature and significance of local politics – so that he could write a paper on the subject. It gives one a chance to indulge in the kind of self-centred ramblings that constituents would never put up with. Fun – and it ended far too soon! I hope that Andri’s essay got a good mark!
  4. On 11th February I had the first of two Education and Children’s Services Committees. Two important items were under discussion, namely the Schools Admissions system and Pupil Place Planning. However, as the transfer between primary and secondary schools seems to have happened quite smoothly this year there was not much to say on the admissions system except “steady as she goes”. Since the Committee met, the potential shortage of secondary school places across the country has been national news. It has been said that the country may have a shortfall of one million places in 5-10 years’ time. And certainly local authorities have protested about the absurdity created by the current Government, whereby local authorities are responsible for providing a sufficient number of school places but are not actually allowed to provide them directly. The academies, it is hoped, will just expand or contract appropriately but without being part of any planning system. The Tory party’s daft reliance on the market could be the cause of much heartache. However, here in Wandsworth we were re-assured that there would be sufficient secondary places even if there might be a tight squeeze in some years. But you may remember that last month I commented that the Chestnut Grove Academy is embarking on the demolition and redevelopment of the school – one Council paper says that there will be 88 extra places and another says there will be none! How we are meant to plan on that basis beggars belief!
  5. There were also a number of cuts, as seems inevitable these days. One was the effective closure of the Alton Activity Centre for youngsters – regrettable as that is, it will have no impact on Latchmere. Perhaps more relevant is the closure of the Accredited Training and Assessment Centre (ATAC), which currently operates out of Battersea Park Road Library, with the loss of half a dozen trainer jobs. But although it is very local to Latchmere I don’t know much about ATAC, which perhaps says something about its significance, or lack of, in the community.
  6. On the 18th there was the Community Services Committee, of which I am not a Eltringham CPZmember, but which I will mention because there were a number of issues of importance to Latchmere, namely the possibility of extending the parking control zones (cpz) in Eltringham/Petergate Road area and Wye Street and installing a zebra crossing in Ingrave Street near to Falconbrook School – wye street cpza mixed bag! The recommendation to extend the parking zone hours in the Eltringham/Petergate area was deferred until June, thanks unfortunately to the intervention, as I understand it, of Tory St. Mary Park councillor Rory O’Broin. The extension of the cpz was agreed in Wye Street and the zebra crossing refused, even though the Committee agreed to “improve” the road signs about the school.
  7. On the 22nd we had the second of the two Education and Children’s Services Committees and this was a far more dramatic occasion. You may not have heard but in December Ofsted gave Wandsworth’s Children’s Services Department a damning report on services for disturbed and vulnerable children and services for young persons, which it said were either inadequate or in need of improvement. It is many years since Wandsworth last had such a stinging rebuke from central government and the Committee discussed how we should recover from this position and make the services as good as they should be. I must make it clear that these services serve a very small minority of Wandsworth’s children, so if you have kids in the school system here in the borough it almost certainly does NOT affect you or your kids. However, if they are in the Council’s care or severely disadvantaged in some way then it is just possible that you (and yours) are affected. If you are concerned that this may affect you, then please get in touch and I will see if I can help.
  8. But in terms of making generic reforms we changed the staffing structure, introduced new management and monitoring procedures and worked out a longer term plan to make sure that the Department improves its practise. You may also have heard that I, in effect, moved a vote of no confidence in the Leader and the Executive member of the Council for Children’s Services. I knew, of course, that this was not going to be accepted by the majority (Tory) party and so in a sense it was “gesture politics”. However since at least one senior officer decided to resign, I think that the politicians in charge at the time should also take the rap – but here in Wandsworth, sadly, they did NOT.
  9. The Planning Applications Committee was on February 24th and what a busy night it was! First up we had the application for Formula E in Battersea Park I can see that this is going to be an annual occasion! This time the event is scheduled for early 2 BPAG From November 24th 2015 to 24th January 2016 004 (800x600)July and, as best I could understand it, it was for more of the Park to be closed to the public for slightly less time. There is no doubt that the event is both immensely popular with many and very unpopular with many others, some of whom are pictured demonstrating outside the Town Hall. My fear is that all the commercial operations that surround Grand Prix racing will slowly but surely take a greater and greater grasp in the Park and that with time the very nature of the Park will change. It is also significant, at least to me, that the date has been put back a couple of weeks into the very heart of summer – what a time to close great swathes of the Park. You will have guessed that I was against and I know many of you will have been for – but that’s the way it goes!
  10. There were many other interesting potential Cringle Dock3developments, but not particularly near to or relevant to Latchmere. One example was the plan to demolish and reconstruct Cringle Dock in Nine Elms Lane. This was imaginative! Can you imagine one of London’s largest refuse transfer stations essentially being rebuilt under a canopy, on which 500 flats are to be built, with the refuse barges appearing out from under rather like a James Bond villain’s underground attack base. Is this really going to happen? Well the completion date is in 2030! Another mega-development was planned for Nine Elms Lane and there were many others and the Committee did not end until about 2 minutes past midnight!
  11. On the 25th my fellow Councillor Simon Hogg and I had another discussion with officers on the Winstanley regeneration programme, though as you know it largely affects the York Road estate and not Winstanley. It is difficult to report anything specific about that other than that work proceeds and that the Council hopes to start work relatively soon on Penge and Inkster Houses.
  12. The Finance and Corporate Services Committee met on 25th Again I am not a member but I thought it worth mentioning that it was decided to increase Council Tax by 3.9%, the maximum allowed by law without triggering a referendum. But to compensate for that increase, the London Mayor’s budget has now been reduced as the costs of the 2012 Olympics are dropping out of his budget, and so we will all see a reduction in our own tax bills.
  13. In this newsletter, I have never ever referred to an internal16225 AGM Tim West 3 Labour Party meeting, largely because I don’t think that they are of public interest but last Thursday, 25th February, our meeting was an exception. We organised radical readings from a number of famous radicals from the past, from Gerard Winstanley to Charlotte Despard, from Labour’s first leader Keir Hardie to Clem Attlee, PM from 1945-51. The readings were inspirational and led by Prunella Scales and Timothy West. Here is Tim in full flow.
  14. Finally I thought I should put in a picture of the Latchmere Recreation Ground. On 23rd October the messy tarmac was ripped up IMG_1737 (2)and the area re-seeded and landscaped. Some of this work had to be done twice because of the wet winter but the Town Hall hopes to open up the Recreation Ground in time for Easter. It will be a welcome extension of green space in Latchmere.

My Programme for March

  1. I have a meeting in Portcullis House (that’s a twentieth century annex to the House of Commons next to old Scotland Yard) on 2nd March, when a cross-party selection of London MPs and councillors will discuss the Government’s cuts to schools’ budgets, and later the same day a SERA think tank. SERA is the Labour Party’s green lobbying organisation and we will discuss our plans for the coming years.
  2. There will be the regular Labour Group meeting: that is Wandsworth’s Labour councillors, on 3rd.
  3. There is an Education and Standards Group on 7th
  4. An old friend of mine, Anita Pollock, who was also the MEP (Member of the European Parliament for Wandsworth, 1989-99), is launching a book on Europe in Westminster – that should be pleasant.
  5. The Council Meeting is on 9th
  6. On 10th March there will be the opening of the Winstanley/York Road estate office in Pennethorne House, followed not long after by the opening of a new Citizens’ Advice Bureau at the main library on Lavender Hill.
  7. I hope to be able to attend a Mayoral hustings with Zak Goldsmith face to face with Sadiq Khan and candidates no doubt from the Greens, Lib/Dems and UKIP.
  8. The Planning Applications Committee is on 23rd

Did you know?

You may remember that in January I went to the 7 P1060345Design Awards Panel and challenged readers to guess, which of the designs received a commendation and why? Well, I must confess that I was a bit surprised because of those who responded most got it right!. And the winner was this very discreet extension (it’s the bit on the top!) to a residential block in Nightingale Lane. It is extremely quiet and under-stated. It adds 5 or 6 flats to the block and just walking by most people don’t even notice it. All the councillors and laymen supported it and all the professionals hated it.

6 20140818_bolingbrokegv_0105The professional architects and designers wanted a building that “made a statement” or “expressed the architect’s personality” – perhaps rather like this glass roof extension, which was another of the entries. All very interesting but I think a little bit more important than that. Doesn’t it raise the question as to whether architects are in the business for their own gratification and not really very interested in whether their creations suit the surrounding environment?

Meanwhile for next month can anyone come up with a direct link between Latchmere and George Bernard Shaw or GBS? GBS was a very famous playwright of the first half of the twentieth century with plays such as Man and Superman, Major Barbara and many, many others. For those of you for whom the first half of the twentieth century is another world, then he will be best known for Pygmalion, the play at the heart of the musical My Fair Lady.

November 7, 2015  

Suffragette

Went to see Suffragette (dir. Sarah Gavron, 2015) at the Brixton Ritzy on Friday, 6th November; not sure exactly what my expectations were but I was hugely impressed by this factional (fiction based on fact) story about woman’s struggle for the vote in the years immediately prior to the First World War. From the off (1912), the street scenes in Bethnal Green and in Westminster were very convincing and the pace of the action suggested a director in total control of her material.

Not too sure, as memory tricks me, but I think that I was taught at school that the suffragette movement had indeed succeeded in raising the profile of women’s suffrage as an important political issue but it was really the War that brought them the suffrage in 1918. With women working in the munitions factories, in nursing and catering, in the transport and many other industries, it had become almost irrational not to grant them the vote. It was, I think, a history written from a male, patronising perspective. Men had at last decided to be fair and decent.

This film is an excellent counter to that complacent perspective. It tells of bitter, intimate (husband v wife) and local (neighbour v neighbour), conflict. Surely victory was as much delayed by War, as speeded on by it. The story is told with a light touch. A young mother, Maud Watt, played exquisitely by Carey Mulligan, drifts almost accidentally into being a curious spectator. Then the dynamics of her situation, the attentions of her sleazy supervisor, the peer pressures of her workmates and her neighbours’ push-and-pull her slowly but inevitably into activism – and the loss of her marriage and her son.

The story cleverly weaves Maud into the events that led to Emily Davison’s death under the hooves of Anmer, King George V’s horse in the 1913 Derby. The screenplay by Abi Morgan is sensitive throughout and the whole film has a superb historical feel, even if there are some arguments about the political detail – it is doubtful that Emily Davison intended to die and also unlikely that a Cabinet member’s wife would have behaved as displayed.

There was a personal appeal for me, because it reminded me so much of stories from my paternal grandmother. She was a seamstress from inner north-east London, who walked to work in Oxford Street. She had four children, was widowed in 1918, and was proud of her vote in the 1919 General Election. Her loathing of Winston Churchill, Home Secretary in the Asquith Government; her politics (and just maybe mine) is illuminated by this film.

It is almost redundant to talk of other great performances, notably that by Helen Bonham-Carter’s and a guest appearance by Meryl Streep as Mrs. Pankhurst; or of the gruesome nature of forced feeding. The film also has a lot to say about the nature of opposition. When does “illegal” action become justifiable? Is violence ever justified? How responsible does opposition have to be? Go and see it, if you haven’t done so already.

 

June 14, 2015  

Warfare or Co-operation

The Relationship of elected councillors and salaried local government officers.

Who are Council officers? Are their interests different from those of councillors’? Do the officers work to the same objectives? Are they motivated by the interests of the electorate as interpreted by the majority party or by rules coming from Whitehall and the law courts? What do they think of elected councillors?

The first thing to note is that officers are not simply local equivalents of the national Civil Service. The Civil Service exists principally to carry out the wishes of the crown, as was, and the elected Government, as is. So historically the civil service administers the Crown’s Government and cares little, at least in theory, for MPs, who from their perspective are merely the electoral body from which the Prime Minister and his colleagues are chosen.

Local government officers, on the other hand, are appointed by their respective Councils, at least in principle, to provide ALL elected members equally with advice. Hence the most junior councillor, even if in a minority of one, and, say, the Leader of the Council have equal rights to get advice, whether on procedural or personal matters, and assistance with constituency issues and casework. In that sense, the junior councillor has access to the highest level of senior officer advice available, in a way that MPs can only dream of from Civil Service Departments. In my experience, new councillors often fail to recognise this opportunity and seldom take advantage of the resources that are there for them.

Local Government officers, however, also serve the elected majority administration of whatever political persuasion. Hence whilst advising councillors as to how they might frame any criticism of the majority party policies, the officers must be careful not to over-step the mark into advising against the administration’s policies.

This is a delicate balance to maintain on a tight-rope and is perhaps why councillors often seem to have more difficulty accepting the political neutrality of their officers than do national politicians of the Civil Service. In my own case, as a councillor on a strongly Tory Council, namely Wandsworth, I have encountered several different but in some ways jaundiced views about the officers.

Some opposition (and here I speak of Tory opposition councillors in the 70s as much as of Labour ones later on) councillors have now, and always have had, an instinctive suspicion that the officers carry out the administration’s policies, not just because that is their job, but because they really are Conservative or Labour supporters.

I could give many examples and no doubt that is why there appears to be more of a tendency to cull senior officers after a change in power at a local rather than a national level.

Other councillors simply think that the officers just happen to be doing their job as best they can. Perhaps because of my background as a local government officer, who wanted to be a “public servant”, I instinctively lean to the view that officers want to perform a public service well. Hence, in the broadest sense, I expect officers to want a healthy and well-funded public service and, therefore, to be inherently more inclined to Labour rather than Tory attitudes, or at least those Tory attitudes that want to limit or even abolish local government services. But clearly this is no more the case than believing that all teachers are Labour voters. Maybe they should be but they most clearly are not – the same is true of local government officers.

But if local government officers are more variegated than elected members often assume, they do have one thing in common and that is their background in local government. Hence they are coloured by the extremely rule-based, legally-encompassed nature of their jobs. Ironically, the attitudes and approaches this training engenders often infuriates councillors, Labour and Tory, who are frustrated by the officers’ very (small c) conservative approach. So that many councillors often end up thinking they have more in common with the “hated” enemy across the Chamber than they do with the officers.

Again, this viewpoint may be dramatically shaped by my experience in Wandsworth where leading lights in both major parties have been very radical in their outlook, whether over their opposition to the Motorway Box, or their pursuit of GLC abolition, or their enthusiasm for an expansionist Council, 1964-90, or a contracting one, 1990-2015. But, whichever the political party, the cries of frustration were often aimed at the cautionary approach of the officers, and not the robust opposition of the opposition councillors, who were merely and quite appropriately doing the job of opposing. Labour and Tory councillors can sometimes behave rather like rival football teams, who are only stopped from having a really good argument by the man with the whistle, the referee or officer, who says, “You can’t do that – we don’t have the powers”.

This state of things results in some misunderstandings, which are reflected in some surprising ways. For officers, whose job it is to carry out the majority party policies and deliver the best possible service within that constraint, the tactics of the opposition can look most confusing. After all, if opposition councillors genuinely believe the services would be better if run by them than by the current majority party, then it becomes relatively easy to justify almost any form of legal wrecking tactics, with the only constraint being what the electorate might think.

From officers, unable to imagine themselves in the opposition’s role, such opposition looks stupid at best and unprincipled at worst. But on the other hand opposition councillors need some room for manoeuvre and may even manufacture opposition rather than run the risk of becoming irrelevant lobby fodder. Any officer, who whilst supporting the administration’s policies, points subtly to the weaknesses in the policies without actually leading the opposition by the hand, deserves the support and praise of both the opposition and, actually, the majority party, which needs a vibrant opposition to keep it on its toes.

Is there any conclusion to draw from this meditation? Well I think there is. Forgetting the time-servers of whom there are enough amongst officers, majority and minority party councillors, I think its best always to recognise a complex mix of motivations is at the heart of any argument.

So we’re not talking about open warfare between councillors and officers, nor complete co-operation either. It’s a complex but endlessly fascinating process of opposition, co-operation and something else between.

June 4, 2015  

Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere June Newsletter (# 73)

May highlights

  1. To state the obvious, the May 7th General Election was a great disappointment for me and the Labour Party. I know that Will Martindale would have made an assiduous MP but that was not to be. Clearly the electorate was not convinced by the thought of Ed Miliband as Prime Minister – he obviously had a bad press, though possibly demonstrated in the TV debates that he didn’t really deserve it. Again, the electorate also clearly believes the Tory story about the blame for our current economic difficulties. I think that story is nonsense (clearly Labour didn’t cause the US sub-prime markets to crash), but one can’t deny that the Tories won the publicity argument.
  2. Although I wish things were different, I have to admit that Jane Ellison is an effective MP – so congratulations, Jane. In the longer term Labour appears to have a tough task winning back the Battersea constituency. On a national level, it does rather concern me that so few eligible voters voted for a Tory Government and yet the Tories have a strong hand in Parliament. It can’t be right that only 25% of the electorate voted Tory, but they have more than half our MPs.
  3. The first past the post system has worked very, very well for the Tory party and, ironically, for the SNP. Both the Greens and UKIP had over 1 million and 3 million votes, respectively, and yet have only one MP each. It is a good system for the Tories but is it doing British democracy any favours? I rather think not. My worst fear is that, with Scotland and Wales going as they are and the south east outside of London going the way it is, with Labour strengthening its position in London, even if not in Battersea, that we are becoming a very divided nation, indeed.
  4. One of the delights of campaigning is discovering little IMG_1210gems, such as this inscription at the corner of Broughton and St. Philip Streets, which reads, “For what shall it profit a man if he shall gain the world and lose his own soul” Gospel according to St. Mark. I must have passed it a thousand times but never noticed it before! Have you noticed it? It is at the corner, just as one turns left coming down Silverthorne Road towards Queenstown Road.
  5. The Annual Council Meeting took place on 13th May. That is the occasion when the new Mayor is elected. This time it was Queenstown ward’s Nicola Nardelli. It is an occasion when the Mayor has as much time as she wishes to take saying whatever she wants to and is, of course, unchallenged. My word what a biased account she gave of the changes in Battersea over the last 40 years. She appeared to have no knowledge of, or at least little sympathy with, that very different Battersea, the Battersea of heavy industry, the Battersea which I talked about in the history walk that I led on 24th May – see picture of the people who came on it with me. If anyone is interested on coming on my next walk, just let me know and I’ll add you to my list.
  6. The Planning Applications Committee met on the 21st May. The two biggest applications were again in Battersea and were both approved. The first was what I think of as a pile of plates awaiting washing up, except that it is for a 28 storey block, which given the size of the first floor is more like 30. It would, not long ago, have been the highest building in Battersea (apart from Battersea Power Station and the giant gasometer next to Battersea Park station), higher even than Sporle Court. But now higher blocks are going up in Nine Elms and Wandsworth Town Centre, all within the Battersea constituency. I opposed this particular application on the grounds it included so little affordable housing. (Affordable housing is a strange description of property designed for people on earnings of £70,000 a year).
  7. The second was a giant development just where the large gasometer was a couple of months back. It included 839 residential units, including affordable housing; approximately 5,700sqm of flexible commercial floorspace including retail, financial and professional services, cafe/restaurant, offices, education, community and leisure uses within buildings ranging from 2 to 26 storeys high; together with landscaped private amenity space and public realm, including publicly accessible routes through the site; an energy centre; basement car parking; basement and ground level cycle parking; refuse storage and servicing and provision for vehicular access. You might be surprised that I supported this application, but actually, if there is anywhere in Battersea that can support 26 storey buildings, then this site, between the railway lines and flush up against the Power Station, is it.
  8. By the way, if you want to see how the gasometer was demolished go on to BBC’s iPlayer and look up a BBC2 programme called the Wrecking Crew. It’s really good TV about a very local subject and can be seen at http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b05x1f6c/demolition-the-wrecking-crew-episode-2. It’s only there until about 20 June, so don’t put off watching it!
  9. Here is the gasometer in all its glory – and the pile of washing up!
  10. Last month I asked you to forgive my cynicism, as I suspected that Tory councillors did not want to agree contentious applications shortly before the General Election. My cynicism promises to be put to the test in the next couple of months with more very large applications coming forward on 2 sites within yards of each other on York Road. These plans already have a mass of negative reaction from local residents but I don’t expect that to cut much ice. Nevertheless, if you object, please put in an objection – local voices can and do make a difference.
  11. On Saturday, 30th May, I was interviewed for Wandsworth Radio’s Sunday morning show. As it happens the show had a technical glitch and I believe that the 15 minute interview will be heard on 7th June. If you want to hear this internet programme then all you need to do is go to http://www.wandsworthradio.com/. Indeed let me recommend that you pay the station a visit anyway and see what it is like.

My Programme for June

  1. On 11th June I have the Education and Children’s Services Committee  and on the 18th the Planning Applications Committee.
  2. On June 18th from 10am – 4pm, Big Local SW11 will be hosting a jobs, training & opportunity day to signpost local provision at Providence House. The aim is to encourage people to come along and explore current job opportunities, meet industry & training professionals, get 1:1 advice, try new skills and enjoy workshops and training sessions.  Workshops available on the day will cover ICT in the workplace, interview skills, CV building, confidence building, recruitment best practice as well as more practical skills-based tasters. Big Local SW11, you will recall, is a resident-led group that has been awarded £1 million from the Big Lottery fund to spend in the SW11 area over the next 10 years.  The website is http://www.biglocalsw11.co.uk/. Along with Big Local SW11 helping us to make it a great day are South Thames College, Wandsworth Workmatch, Providence House, Wandsworth Lifelong Learning, WOW Mums enterprise club, STORM, Generate, Well-kneaded, SPEAR, Generate and others. Please, do come and join us. Big Local SW11 is also looking for mentors so to sign up for workshops please visit www.biglocalsw11.org.uk.
  3. This week-end I am off to Dorset for a couple of days with the grandchildren, aged 1 and 2 (with their parents to do the nappies, etc.). Penny and I are looking forward to that.
  4. I have written a couple of times about the plans for the all-weather astro-turf pitch in Falcon Park. There has been a lot of public disquiet about this possibility, so much indeed that the Town Hall planners have taken the plans back for re-consideration. I doubt whether the idea is dead and buried but public consultation has at least forced a re-consideration. I have been assured now that there will be no planning application before September. Watch this space for further updates.

Did you know?

JayCourt1Only two of you replied to my question last month about the tower block named after Douglas Jay, M.P., and I am afraid that Peter’s answer was wrong. It was not Park Court on the Doddington estate, as my respondent suggested, but rather Park South, sitting on Battersea Park Road – well done, Kathleen. Here it is and here also is a famous incident from 1829, which took place in Battersea Park, Who is thisor rather what used to be called Battersea Fields, before it became the park. It is a duel between a serving British Prime Minister and a political rival. It features in my history walk. Can anyone tell me who the Prime Minister and his opponent were and what were they fighting about? (The clue is in the inset picture).

January 10, 2015  

Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere January Newsletter (# 68)

   December highlights

  1. I went to Nightingale School on 1st December. It is meant to be for difficult children. There is, of course, an “acceptable” description and that is an EBDS school or a school for pupils with emotional, behavioural and social difficulties. Let’s be honest: I was not impressed. OK, so I am no expert but in many ways this school felt more like a prison than a school. I will be keeping a close eye on it in future. I do not think it is the sort of place in which we ought to be raising our kids, even if (or especially if) they are children with difficulties.
  2. On the 8th I had the so-called Education and Standards Group, no excitement there, and on the next day the December Council Meeting. This was difficult for me! Having not been Leader of the Opposition for the best of part of four years now, I have got used to not playing as large a role in the Council Meeting but with many more Labour councillors (good thing) and far fewer Council meetings (really bad thing) for the first time in my memory – for the first time for 40 years maybe – I didn’t say a word! OK, I mock, and maybe I am taking the mickey out of myself to a degree. Nonetheless, our (the councillors that is) lessening role in the whole operation does make me wonder where democracy is going  – at least at the local level. Should we just let the local government officers get on with it – make them all in effect national civil servants? Of course, I don’t think so. What do you think?
  3. Two days later I did see an interesting play at the Royal Court in Sloane Square called Hope, which posed many of the same issues. In the play, when the councillors refused to impose any more government imposed cuts, the civil servants did take over and everything got cut. I wrote a review of the play that you can see a couple of entries back on this blog.
  4. Talking of which did you?????????????????? see/know about the Council’s threat to close Battersea’s Sports Centre in Hope Street. It was “announced” to the staff on 16th December. The Sports Centre is very busily used by well over 20 sports clubs and local organisations and it is not as though the area is over-endowed with alternatives. What did the Council’s own reports about the 2011 riots say – there was not a lot for young people to do in the area. But now they want to close down one of the busiest centres of them all! There is a petition for signature at the following address http://www.willtowin.org.uk/#!save-battersea-sports-centre/c150j if you wish to express your opposition.
  5. The Planning Applications Committee was on the 16th. There was one significant local application, which was for shopping and housing development on the site of the Prince’s Head pub in Falcon Road. The pub has been far from popular with some of its neighbours for many years now and the thought of it being replaced with shops and 27 housing units will be welcome. The development at some 4/5 storeys will fit in with the general scale of the 1970’s estate. However, it is not the first time that an application has been approved for this site and there is no guarantee that it will happen; but let’s hope that it proceeds.
  6. There were two much larger applications on sites many Latchmere residents will know well. The first in the rather shambolic area immediately opposite Battersea Park Railway Station. It will include St. Mary’s Catholic School, Lockington Road, Patcham Terrace and railway viaducts and arches including a number of small neighbouring sites. The new development will have 290 housing units and a new purpose-built two-form entry school. There will also be a direct access route from Battersea Park station to a new entrance to Queenstown Road Station passing along what will effectively be a new road with shops and offices. One of the blocks will be 16 storeys high but although I am usually opposed to yet more high buildings in Battersea I thought that this was rather a good scheme and supported it.
  7. The second application is in the heart of Wandsworth and includes Welbeck House, yes the Council’s old Social Services Department, and the Housing Department office in 17-27 Garratt Lane, along with some South Thames College land. The application was for 201 residential units, 25% “affordable”, some commercial space and a new Wandsworth Town Centre library. But it also went up to 26 storeys and included some pretty uninspired looking architecture. I didn’t like it much and voted against.
  8. I spent Xmas with grandchildren and had a HAPPY NEW YEAR’s Eve at a Jazz Club I rather like in Streatham!.

My Programme for January 

  1. I know some of you know about my wonky knee, thanks to a cycling holiday in Holland in September, 2013. Well on January 7th I had a minor operation, an “arthroscopy”, on that and, whilst strictly for my next newsletter, I will say that it seems to have gone quite well, though a bit stiff and sore. More next month!
  2. On the 12th I am going to the launch of a new Wandsworth Radio station, which is going to be based in Latchmere, in Battersea Park Road. There has been an internet based radio station covering Wandsworth called Raider’s for some time, but this new one is aimed solely at Wandsworth. Interesting and I hope I can tell you more about it and its launch next month.
  3. Yet again I have the so-called Education and Standards Group on 15th January.
  4. The Planning Applications Committee will be on the 20th.
  5. And then in the diary there is a “Special” Council Meeting on the 28th, but I don’t know why and I guess it is not going to happen! – so actually I haven’t got much on in January!

You may recall that last month I asked “Did you or do you know Fara Williams?” 00P9

 

Well, I am afraid that there has not been any response as yet so I thought I’d go a bit further and test you out with a few views taken between Xmas and NY.

Here they are with a couple of quiz questions:-

?????????????????  On the left, what and where is this?

And where is this below, what would it be called up North (Yorkshire & Lancashire), and which roads does it link? ???????????????????

 

 

 

Where is this gypsy encampment? This one is a stone’s throwCulvert Gypsy camp outside Latchmere. The other two are in the ward.

 

 

 

January 9, 2015  

High Rise developments in London – and Battersea

Just in case anyone out there still believes that the development of high rise residential blocks, on the Battersea river-front and all round the Nine Elms Lane area, has anything to do with housing need or provision of housing for Londoners then see “The Super-Rich and Us” on iPlayer BBC2 last night, 8th January at 9 pm.

This is an excellent analysis by Jacques Peretti of the tax haven and property speculation hub London has become with Battersea playing one of the major roles in the property area. The one thing it misses out on is, not only are these properties nothing whatsoever to do with supplying demand, but they are actually worsening the position.

I am not sure quite how to prove my point but I have more than sufficient anecdotal “evidence” to suggest that the ludicrous property boom along the Battersea river-front far from reducing prices in the market (which is surely what classic economics would suggest) is actually encouraging house and rental inflation in the rest of Battersea/Vauxhall, etc.

This should be compulsory viewing for all those Tory councillors and their not inconsiderable number of Labour sympathisers who believe that building more and more is anything like a sufficient response to the housing crisis. We desperately need more control of the market – oh and pretty hefty taxation of the rich!

December 30, 2014  

Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere December Newsletter (# 67)

November highlights     

  1. I had an unusually sporty start to November. My partner, rather uncharacteristically, suddenly said that she wanted to go to some “big” sporting events so we went to Twickenham to see Australia take on the Barbarians on the 1st November and on the 15th we went to the semi-final of the ATP World Tour Finals tennis tournament at the O2. Now, at the cost of losing support all over Latchmere, I have to say that big-time rugby does not do an awful lot for me, even when 76 points are scored! Modern stadia are so big that you are miles from the action even when it is down your end but when a high proportion of the action is in the scrum and even Brian Moore, on the telly, can’t tell you what is happening then what are you meant to make of it in Row ZZ? But we were lucky at the O2. We had great tickets and saw what was, by common consent, the best match of the tournament – Roger Federer’s 4-6, 7-5, 7-6 (6) win over fellow Swiss Stan Wawrinka.00P1
  2. 00P2I went to the Fireworks Display in Battersea Park on00P3 8th November. It was a bit wet and miserable and probably for that reason not as crowded as the previous year. The fireworks really are spectacular. Two things about it struck me, well three actually. Ever since the 2000 Sydney Olympics these shows appear to have been dominated by Oz-choreography (Is that the word for someone who designs firework displays?). Are our friends, the Australians, now the world’s experts on fireworks? Secondly, whilst the fusion of music and fireworks is dramatic and incredibly well done, does the sheer volume of the music detract from some of the pleasure? I used to enjoy hearing the “Oohs and Aahs” of the crowd and the excited shrieks of the kids but nowadays everything is drowned out by massively amplified music. 00P4Who agrees with me? Third as I gazed at the rockets a mere 3 or maybe 4,000 feet above are the airliners coming in to Heathrow. What do passengers, who know nothing of Guy Fawkes, think? Do any wonder whether they have entered a war zone?
  3. Talking of war zones, earlier on the same day I had been to the Emanuel School First World War centenary exhibition. It was a very personal exhibition in that it had school photographs and memorabilia associated with old boys (and staff) from the school relating to war during the last 100 years. I was particularly taken with this doodle in a school exercise book from 1943, which clearly depicts a Spitfire along with a tank and a couple of other fighter planes.
  4. On the 9th I went to the Remembrance Day service in00P6 St. Mary’s, Battersea, along with Wendy and Simon, my fellow Latchmere councillors, Sally-Ann Ephson, Queenstown councillor, and Will Martindale, Labour’s Parliamentary candidate in next May’s General Election.. The ceremony was a suitably sombre and moving occasion and was followed as always by a march past. For me, however, the “real” and moving occasion is at 11.00 on the 11th itself in Battersea Park. There is something about the open-air nature of the ceremony, with the late autumn leaves falling and crows and sea gulls wheeling around under leaden skies, which always makes it very appropriate.
  5. On that very same evening I took part in the interview panel for the Deputy Director of Education at Wandsworth Council. The successful candidate was Catherine Duffy.
  6. On the evening of the 10th November, I was at the Civic Awards presentation, which is always an enjoyable occasion where the borough “honours” volunteers, who have had a record of service to the Borough. One award recipient, who may be known to many readers, is Liz Shaw. Liz is well known for her charitable work and fundraising, especially her organising of the Xmas Day Party for the Elderly held on Xmas Day itself in Battersea Park. She is also known as a freelance photographer to be seen behind the lens at many a Wandsworth event.
  7. The Planning Applications Committee on the 12th considered a mass of applications but was totally dominated by the Covent Garden Market application. This of course lies outside of Latchmere ward but the giant scale of this application will affect the whole of Wandsworth and is therefore worth at least a mention! The site is actually bigger than the Battersea Power Station site and covers the whole area of the so-called Covent Garden Market Towers and the flower market, the vast sheds of the vegetable market on the Wandsworth Road side of the railway, the large entrance site on Nine Elms Lane and quite a few smaller ancillary sites tucked round the edge of the area. (By the way, from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries, this huge site included the old Nine Elms station and the London and South-Western railway works and believe it or not I can just remember steam trains crossing Nine Elms Lane.)
  8. This development was all described in one giant application, reported to the Committee in a paper of more than 200 pages in length. The application provided for over 3,000 new homes, let alone a new Covent Garden market, offices, new shopping, a new school, public open space, a playing field, access roads and a car-park. How exactly the Committee is meant to make a clear and sensible Yes/No decision on such an enormous application, I do not know – we are not allowed to amend but merely say Yes or No. It clearly leaves masses of question marks over a planning process, which covers both, say, roof extensions worth say £50,000 and applications of this kind which will take ten years to implement in full and will cost several £billions. But we did our best! I voted against the application although some of you seek to persuade me that all modern development is inevitable and really good but then again others claim that it is usually evil and ugly.
  9. So here are a few words in self-defence! I knew that the application would be passed and therefore I had what one might describe as a free vote – I knew my vote would not make a difference on the night but that it was an expression of opinion, which may or may not affect future applications. And I have several criticisms of all these vast developments that we are now seeing in Nine Elms. My first, and main objection, is that there is nowhere near enough provision of so-called affordable housing. There is plenty of discussion in political circles about what affordable might mean and whether housing said to be affordable for people on £50,000 a year is really affordable or not for the majority of Wandsworth residents. My position is simply that there is not enough affordable housing, whatever the definition.
  10. Secondly, and this I know is contentious, I think we are providing far too much retail space. With two giant new Westfield Centres now within easy train journeys access from Clapham Junction and with more and more people doing their shopping on-line, I think that developers are being far too bullish about the need for shopping centres in Nine Elms – especially if we are going to protect the existing Clapham Junction, Wandsworth, Balham, Putney and00P5 Tooting shopping centres. Over-develop and some of these other centres will suffer. Actually, I am winning hands-down on this issue as every time developers come back with revised plans, and they often do, the shopping is down-sized.
  11. Thirdly, and far more contentious still, I do not like the march of ever higher tower blocks into both the Borough and the City. A couple of the tower blocks we agreed in November are going to be even higher than the Tower, which is shown on the right of this picture from Lambeth Bridge.
  12. On the 24th the Education and Children’s Services Committee considered the admissions criteria for primary schools and a whole raft of other issues. The controversial issue for primary schools is that some parents can afford to “work” the system, by buying or renting property near the “best” schools so as to ensure that their little ones go to the schools with the best examination results – at the cost of some very local children, who get displaced. This is a major issue in south Battersea but for some reason or other does not seem to cause such concern in Latchmere.
  13. You may recall that I made some critical remarks last month about what was happening to Westbridge primary school, Bolingbroke Walk. The problems related to it becoming part of the Chapel Street Academy Trust. Well I heard early in December that the Trust has taken steps to address the problems that all the Education Committee members saw and have strengthened the governance of the school and provided greater support to the Head. Let’s hope these measures work!

My Programme for December

  1.  I went to Nightingale School on 1st December.
  2. On the 8th I had the so-called Education and Standards Group.
  3. The December Council Meeting was held on the 10th.
  4. The Planning Applications Committee was on the 16th.
  5. And then there was Xmas and a HAPPY NEW YEAR to you all.

Finally did you or do you know Fara Williams?

Do you know England’s greatest footballer – at least in terms of 00P9being the most capped player in English history. Fara Williams, pictured here, has been capped for England 131 times – and for Great Britain in the Olympics 5 times. She now plays professionally for Liverpool Ladies, having played for Chelsea, Charlton and Everton. She is employed by the Women’s FA as a skills coach.

Why do I mention her here? Because I recently read about her history in a national newspaper article and learnt that she grew up on a North Battersea estate, which has got to mean that Fara stands a pretty fair chance of having been a Latchmere resident. Her history includes being homeless and living on the streets for some of her early England career. I also think that she might have gone to Elliott School before it became an Ark Academy.

Whatever the history 00P8and whatever the details, and I hope some of you might be able to fill in some of them, it is clear that her fame would be far greater if she was a man who had played over 100 times for England (she compares her mid-field role to that of Steven Gerard’s) and represented the country at 2 World and 3 European championships. Can anyone help me with this story, because she should be recognised by the Borough!

October 11, 2014  

School Governors & governance.2

Hilary writes to tell me that I am wrong (see blog earlier this month). She tells me that skills are necessary in the modern governing board and that the time of the stakeholder is past. Well I agree on the last point but that is a regret and I need to thank Hilary for forcing me to make my point more clearly.

It is actually worse than I relayed. Now that we are looking for skill sets and not stakeholders we are also handing over most of the appointment process to the Head. The end result is not likely to be people in a very strong position to challenge either head or school.

In my considerable experience as a governor, it was mainly the stakeholders, who had the self-confidence and frankly the clout to challenge the head or the school’s ingrained modus operandi. In future as more and more governors are appointed through school controlled mechanisms there will be, in my submission, less and less, not more and more, challenge.

As once a technician and for a long-time a councillor, I think I know, which was the more likely to be a challenger. Give me the councillor over a financial whizz any day.

September 19, 2014  

Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere August Newsletter (# 64)

  August highlights

  1. Let’s face it, I’ve just had the longest August holiday in quite a long time 1and so there haven’t been many highlights outside of holidaying – though I did get to meet the Deputy Mayor of Sofia, capital of Bulgaria. However I thought I’d share a couple of thoughts about holidaying in the former Yugoslavia and in Bulgaria. First and most obviously the Adriatic coast, of both Montenegro and Croatia where I was, is spectacular. The scenery is staggering, the sea is warm (though I did read last week about Great White Shark attacks in the Adriatic – but after I got back, thank goodness), the wine is good and the food OK. I don’t want to bore with holiday snaps but here is just one of the Montenegro coast.
  2. Rather more sobering is the realisation that “Yugoslavia” is, or was not that long ago – 1990s, a war zone. The war affected the whole of the Balkans but, as far as I could see, the centre of the war was Bosnia and there the picture is rather less rosy than in Croatia. The bomb sites in the2 centre of town and the bullet and artillery shell holes in the buildings are very noticeable. In the tourist haven of Mostar, the tourist area itself is largely and well re-constructed but just a hundred metres from the tourist sites are empty, derelict houses, flats and businesses. Our B&B host on one night was weeping that she, a Muslim, married to a Catholic, was living happily with her neighbours in the 1980s and then found herself overnight as it were at war with her neighbours. How did it happen and why? She could not understand.
  3. It’s perhaps not very clear in this picture but this shelled out building, an empty husk, is a stone’s throw from the tourist hotspots!
  4. It would be impossible here surely! But then, uncomfortably, temperatures do appear to have risen a little north of the border. We must ensure that bitter feelings are controlled.
  5. However, the ex-Yugoslavian countries seem fairly vibrant compared to Bulgaria, where the collapse of the old Soviet-style heavy industries seems to have left the country as a complete economic disaster area. Massive industrial complexes stand derelict and empty with much of the rural population left to flee to the capital, Sofia. The Black Sea coastal resorts and, no doubt, the ski resorts are doing well but much of Bulgaria looks like a country with big problems.
  6. Here in Latchmere, the Council’s Community Safety Team have installed a security camera in Anerley St  to assist in issues concerning the theft of mopeds and dangerous driving of the vehicles in the area. Anerley Street is the short link between Dagnall Street and Battersea Park Road and I must say it is encouraging to see the police and the Council co-operating in trying to control the young villains who are largely responsible for this annoying and dangerous vandalism.
  7. I also heard the good news in August that the South West London Law Centre is going to re-locate in Falcon Road, next to the Mercy Foundation and near to the Prince’s Head. We have not had an appropriate location for the Law Centre for some years now but this new accommodation will be right at the heart of the action and well placed to serve the people who most need its services.

My Programme for September

  1.  I am going to the Labour Party Conference in Manchester, starting on Sunday, 21st.
  2. The Planning Applications Committee will meet on 15th and the Education & Children’s Services Committee on the 17th.
  3. I will be at the AGM of GCSE Success, the self-help homework club, at York Gardens Library on 20th.

Did you know? Oh, dear I haven’t got anything to put here this month! Hopefully inspiration will come in time for next month!

« Older Posts
Newer Posts »