Councillor Tony Belton’s January, 2017, Newslettter (# 92)
- The most important December event
for many Latchmere and Queenstown residents was the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) decision on 14th December to approve the 14-storey development at 3 Culvert Road. I was very sorry not to be there (see my operation below) but my objections were voiced by my fellow Latchmere councillor, Simon Hogg, who went to the PAC specifically to argue the case against the development, although as a non-member of PAC he could not vote. - I know that Simon, who is the Leader of the Labour councillors, wants to fight the Borough Election in May, 2018, on, amongst other things, the issue of over-development in north Battersea. It is a view that I have held for quite a few years now. Not of course that one can be against all developments everywhere and I am not. But I have seen little evidence that all the expensive, tower block developments along the Nine Elms and Battersea river-fronts have been built to the benefit of the average Londoner – rich foreigners and top-end businessmen perhaps but not too many for ordinary Joes and Joannas.
- If I had been there I’d like to think that the vote might have been 4:4 and in effect decided on the Tory Chair’s casting vote, but alas the application would still have been approved. Now let’s see what Mayor Sadiq Khan makes of the application. I know Sadiq well – he was on PAC with me when he was my deputy in Wandsworth in the early 2000s. Then he would have voted against the application. Now, however, I am concerned that his overall responsibility for ensuring the development of lots of homes in London means that he might not give local objections quite the weight that he would have done 12 years ago.
- One issue that many residents raised with me was the issue of whether the provision of new sports facilities for the Harris Academy (as offered by the developer) could seriously be considered to be a “community” benefit. Some argued that kind of provision should be made by the tax or ratepayer and not considered to be a bargaining chip in the process of planning approvals. I completely agree with the sentiments behind that view. Unfortunately, however, that is no longer the way local government works. We are discouraged more and more from paying for services (and the corollary of raising Council tax) and encouraged more and more to “trade” for them. In Orwellian speak, we bargain with developers over how much “public” benefit they are prepared to provide in return for the Council agreeing to larger and more profitable developments.
- In everyday language, this would be described as selling planning permissions but of course such language is not acceptable. Advocates of this approach claim instead that we are negotiating benefits, which the public might find some kind of compensation for adversely affecting their environment. The scandalous outcome, in this case, is that the actual physical benefit of a new sports hall and associated facilities will go down as an asset in Harris Academy’s books and not as a Council asset!
- Still it was an argument that seemed to convince one of my Labour colleagues, who to my complete surprise and astonishment voted for the application. I intend to discuss this with her further.
- On Monday, 5th December, I represented the Labour councillors at St. Mary Park’s Let’s Talk Meeting at St John Bosco school. I think I have said this before but the Council really needs to re-think these sessions. Designed to keep the public more involved and concerned about local developments, the reality is that they are attended by the “same” group of highly committed local residents, who are all invariably well known to the councillors. The meetings do not impact the lives of 99.9% of the population. It is an example of seeming well meant but pointless consultation.
- On the 7th I was due in Chelsea and Westminster
for a new knee, so to “celebrate” my partner took me away for the week-end (3rd-4th) to the Goodwood Hotel. Delightful it was too; the food was excellent; they have a great indoor pool (jacuzzi and sauna of course) and on the Saturday night we went to Chichester Festival Theatre to see E.M. Forster’s “A Room with a View”, starring Felicity Kendall – not brilliant I am afraid; and on the Sunday, we had a beautiful walk round Goodwood Park (see picture), brilliant. - Then came the 7th. Well, I don’t want to go on about my knee replacement. It is after all an operation that plenty of other people have had. To be fair the surgeon did say
beforehand that I would find it very painful for two weeks. He was right except that it was at least three weeks. Now four weeks later, it feels something like normal. What do you reckon on this picture of my left leg, a week into recovery? Oh, by the way, I have been told not to show this – self-indulgent one friend says – but here goes! At least it helps the memory!
- The trouble with pain is that it is almost indescribable, unless perhaps one uses poetry, but I am not sure that I am up to that. Indeed, pain is of such an immediate, transient nature, that it is almost impossible to remember. Do you have a clear image of your worst toothache? All I can say is that at its worst I decided to give my knee pain 8 on a scale of 1 to 10. I have never before, ever, gone above 6.
My Programme for January
- On 10th January, I have a meeting of Wandsworth’s Conservation Area Advisory Committee, followed on 17th by the Planning Applications Committee.
- On the 23rd January, I have a meeting of the Heliport Consultative Committee. Every “large” airport in the country has to have such a committee as a consultative body between the airport and the local authority and the local communities. Battersea Heliport is the only heliport in the country so large that it falls within this rule. It is though only a consultative committee and it does not have executive powers. So we can advise on the impact of chopper noise on local residents but we cant ban particularly noisy aircraft. One limited bit of good news is, however, that we have been assured that the next generation of helicopters will be 30% quieter than today’s craft.
Do you know?
Last month I asked you, who is standing on the traditional soap box addressing the crowd? And where and when? Congratulations to those two or three people who guessed correctly that the man on the soap box was Harold Wilson, speaking at a public meeting on the way to the October, 1964, General Election. As for where, well; close observation shows the street name as Wakehurst Road, and the meeting to be on the corner of Wakehurst and Northcote Roads. And so, for this month’s mystery question, I am going to turn to you. I have been so pre-occupied with my operation and recovering from a new knee that I haven’t got round to working out a question. So, let me turn the tables on you, my readers, and ask you to pose a Battersea related question that I cannot answer and which I will pose to everyone else, next month.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere June, 2016, Newsletter (# 85)
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere June Newsletter (# 61)
May highlights
1. May was, as you have probably guessed, totally dominated (for me) by the Borough Elections. For the record, as I assume that many of you will not know the details, the votes were: Tony Belton 2172: Wendy Speck 1933: Simon Hogg 1899: William Plummer (Tory) 1218: Rose Sintim (Tory) 1203: Rosemary Summerfield (Tory) 1096: Peter Mason (Green) 508: Angela Tinkler (UKIP) 327: Hollie Voyce (Lib/Dem) 221: Robert Edwards (TU & Socialist Coalition) 106
This amounted to an average swing to the three of us, Wendy, Simon and me, of 5%, for which many thanks to t
hose of you who voted for one, two or all three of us. Indeed to anyone who voted – Great, but I am afraid that the turnout was only 34.93% so two out of three Latchmere residents did NOT vote! (This picture of us on the platform was at about 2 a.m. on the Friday morning after an election day when we were up and around the polling stations as early as 7 am on the Thursday – it was a long day).
2. In the Borough as a whole the Tory party comfortably retained control by 41 to 19 councillors, but they did lose six Council seats and Labour gained six. Other interesting facts about the election in Wandsworth included a) every single Green Party candidate came third after the two “main” parties and defeated the Lib/Dems in every ward, b) there was a 5/6% swing to the two main parties from all the other candidates, who included Green, UKIP, Lib/Dem, Independents, Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition and the Communist Party of Britain and c) that UKIP really did not figure anywhere at all in the Borough (or indeed anywhere in Inner London). The other notable feature of election night was the rise of women. Of the six Labour gains five were women and so now of the 19 Labour councillors 10 are women. On the Tory side there are 26 men and 15 women, with the result that we have 25 female councillors as opposed to 35 men.
3. I also went to a few Hustings meetings, all of which had a respectable sized audience – maybe 50 or 60 residents. One of the most dramatic was in Wandsworth, where the UKIP speaker had a stroke just as he was starting to speak. We later heard that, after spending a night in hospital, he went home and has recovered well.
4. A quick update on the Mayoral Bike stations. I continue to monitor the usage of all the Bike stations and there is no doubt that usage continues to grow quite rapidly. The weather of course helps so the bikes are being used about three times as much as when they were first installed in January. I am happy to give individual figures if anyone is interested but, until usage shows something new, I think I will leave it at that.
My Programme for June
1. Well, imagine you were at work and overnight you had a 50% turnover of staff. There would be all kinds of roles to sort out and jobs to arrange. So I guess that most of June I will be getting to know new people and sort out new roles. One new job for me is that I am going to take on the lead role on the Labour side on Children’s Services, all about schools and social services. That is a completely new job for me and so I have to teach myself about all the issues involved!
2. I am, however, continuing to be the Labour lead on the Planning Applications Committee, which will meet on 17th. And, of course, I will continue to be interested in the whole Latchmere regeneration project. Meanwhile Simon Hogg is taking over my current job as Labour lead on Housing and Wendy Speck is moving to Strategic Planning.
3. On 1st June I led a “History Walk”, partly in Latchmere, for Wandsworth’s Heritage Festival. This is becoming an annual feature and would interest, I like to think, anyone interested in local history. Let me know if that sounds interesting to you and I will put you down on the list for next year! A part of the walk includes the following
Did you know that?
The last time a Prime Minister took part in a duel, it took place in Battersea Fields
– a marshy area which is now Battersea Park. The Prime Minister was the Duke of Wellington, popularly known as the “Iron Duke”. He had been the British hero, along with Nelson, in the Napoleonic Wars and was in command at Waterloo, when Britain and its allies finally defeated Napoleon.
He got the sobriquet, Iron Duke, by being a hard disciplinarian, but a popular general. One of his major dislikes was duelling. He forbad it in the army because he was, not unreasonably, concerned that, if his officers had to die, they should die facing the French and not in silly duels.
So imagine the publicity that he got in London’s morning papers when they discovered that the Prime Minister had fought a duel across the river in the rather infamous Battersea Fields. His opponent was the Earl of Winchilsea, who, when it came down to it, shot into the air, leaving Wellington to fire his pistol into the ground.
This was in 1829 but how did the Prime Minister, a Duke, and an Earl come to be fighting a duel in the first place. It wasn’t about a woman or gambling debts or a casual slight but about politics. Wellington had decided to repeal anti-Catholic legislation, which had been imposed during and after the Civil War, and Winchilsea, who was an ardent Protestant accused Wellington of “selling” Protestantism short.
In fact Wandsworth, being near to Westminster but safely on the “wrong side of the river” was the scene of one or two famous duels between “top people” in the early nineteenth century. As for me, I am distinctly pleased that nowadays we use ballots and no longer bullets!

















![7 wendy[1]](https://tonybelton.blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/7-wendy1.jpg?w=276&h=300)


