The Wandsworth Story behind Right to Buy
Wandsworth Tories introduced an aggressive Right-to-buy (RTB) policy a year before Mrs Thatcher came to power and made it a national Tory plank. It was, of course, a barn stormer and won many votes for the Tory party – and lost many more for a Labour Party perplexed about exactly how to tackle a policy, which was so perfectly attuned to an 80s Loadsamoney philosophy and such an anathema to any collectivist dream.
Lost in the political firestorm were some quiet voices on the Labour side, me included, who said as loudly as we could that outright opposition to the RTB policy was pointless but that reasoned criticism was valid and should have been pursued relentlessly. I recall two particular threads to our criticism. One was that receipts from sales should be used to replace housing stock.
Now in the current crisis about the lack of affordable housing everyone, even the Cameron Government, is talking, however disingenuously, about council house sales being accompanied by a policy of like for like replacement. The fact that the Blair/Brown Governments did no more to replace like for like than the Major/Cameron Governments does not make it any easier!
But the second criticism we had was that RTB would in the end result in the loss of affordable housing and would not be a long-term gain to the goal of creating a “property owning democracy”. Perhaps it is a little difficult to recall just how much Mrs Thatcher made of the creation of a share-owning, property-owning democracy but it was a central plank of the Tory philosophy of the 1980s. Now, however, with the first analyses of the 2011 Census figures we discover that for the first time since the war the proportion of the population living in private sector rented accommodation is on the rise and the number of owner occupiers is actually declining. Just what has happened to the property owning democracy?
Well using Wandsworth as an example reveals some interesting trends. Since 1978, the Council has sold 16,000 leasehold properties out of a stock of approximately 40,000 (there have also been thousands of freehold sales, including sales of whole estates). Having done some research on these 16,000 it appears that 5,650, or 35%, are now in the hands of private landlords, who have developed private sector rented empires on many Wandsworth estates.
The Council admits that one landlord owns 93 leases, from where he runs a private rented empire, whose asset value, very conservatively estimated, is worth more than £10 million. These 93 flats are let out almost exclusively to students of Roehampton University.
Moreover the Council admits to the fact that a further 17 landlords own more than 10 properties and another 83 own more than 5. But having done my own research on the figures and talking to the Council about their methodology, I am fairly confident that they have under-estimated the situation. The Council’s own figures are done on a simple spreadsheet exercise against a file of leaseholder names. They have not been asked to look more closely at the data and they have not done so – but I have.
It is clear that there are networks of ownership between members of the same family and apparently independent companies, often sharing the same addresses. Hence there are several small rental empires on, for example, Battersea’s famous Doddington Estate. In these properties, the Council makes an estimate for housing benefit calculations of rents are about 250% higher than the Council equivalent for the neighbouring properties. So for example, a two-bed Council owned flat is let at £123 per week and the privately owned neighbouring flat has a base of £320 per week for benefit calculation – the actual rent might be much higher.
As of early December, 2012, 31 of these properties were leased back by the Council for housing homeless families, all of whom were in receipt of Housing Benefit or Local Housing Allowance. No doubt some of these families will be hit by the so-called Benefits Reform that some Tory councillors defend on the rather ironic grounds that it will force private landlords to lower their rents. What a trick! Essentially guilty of creating a rental market with highly inflated rents they now accuse those very same landlords, they created, of exploiting the benefits system.
What I find extraordinary about this situation is that the Council officers, and the Tories, find none of this surprising. As one officer said to me, “If you return the properties into the market place then you will see the market acting as it always does with tendencies towards monopolies and exploitation”. He was accepting the reality of the situation. The Tory response is, of course, to defend the market despite, or because of, its faults, and actively to work to destroy the collectivist response to a major human need, which was the original purpose of council housing.
They have the temerity to criticise council housing and many of the subsidies that they claim it was based on and yet do not bat an eyelid at those very same once public resources being used for personal profit and gain.
This is perhaps not surprising amongst Tory councillors, who in Wandsworth are distinguished by the rise of its very own rentier class. It is not necessarily easy to interpret from the members’ register of interests but it looks possible that up to 10 Tory councillors, 20% of the whole, rent out properties for an income. But what I do find fascinating is that some Labour members seem to accept the market-place’s role, the place of market rents as a standard and the inevitable supremacy of market forces. Curious, when council housing has for a hundred years been a collectivist and, despite the occasional disaster, a highly successful response to the major problem of housing the totality and not just the affluent in our population. Doubly curious given that the two oldest council estates in the country, the Totterdown estate, and the direct works built Latchmere estates, are both Wandsworth estates!
Prisoners and the Right to Vote
David Cameron and the Tory Party state that they are physically sick at the prospect of being forced to legislate to allow convicted prisoners the vote. Many on the left, though from my personal experience those temperamentally on the autocratic left, are inclined to agree with him. But I can think of at least four reasons to legislate to allow prisoners to vote.
1. The Practical Argument.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) demands that we should do so and until we do many civilised communities in Europe will think of us as hardly more democratic than, say, many of the ex-Soviet bloc. And the ECHR is not some Brussels dominated anti-democratic organisation but a Court largely established by British lawyers in the aftermath of WWII precisely to prevent the human rights’ abuses of the Nazi and Soviet regimes. We should be proud of it.
Just why get into this political fight, when the British prison population, the largest in Europe outside of the old Soviet bloc, is less than 100,000. It is actually less than 90,000, which means on average the 650 Parliamentary constituencies would have a possible 138 voters each, less than 0.02% of the electorate. Assuming that all voted the same way in an organised and consistent way that could have affected the result in 2 constituencies at the 2010 Election, Fermanagh and Tyrone, where they would have had to have voted for the Independent candidate and Hampstead and Kilburn, where they would have had to have voted Tory.
2. The Judicial Argument
One curious feature of the opposition to this reform on the left is that it assumes the perfection and consistency of the judicial system. In practise 10 years of service on the bench as a JP taught me much more scepticism. Big time fraudsters often get away without imprisonment and small time welfare benefit recipients often don’t. We all have pet examples, even the Daily Mail, when we are shocked that imprisonment has been meted out as the punishment. One thing is certain, the judicial system is not, and probably never could be consistent.
3. The Enlightened Argument.
Any judicial system worth its salt should not just be punitive in intent but also restorative. Depriving a prisoner of the vote not only shows what society thinks of him/her but does nothing to encourage him/her to take an active and responsible part in the society, which almost certainly s/he will re-join.
4. The Philosophical Argument.
The democratic struggles of the last three centuries, in this country and around the world, have centred on the Right to Vote. It is called a Right and not a privilege granted by the state. To attack this right is very dangerous territory indeed and yet the Tory Party and many on the un-democratic left want to dabble in this quagmire rather than simply accept the European Court’s view that all, including convicted prisoners, should have the right not privilege to vote.
It is not a privilege to be taken away by the state at the whim of the elected majority but an inalienable right. As soon as it is in the gift of those in power then there is no distinction in principle between our society and many others of which we all disapprove.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere December Newsletter (# 44)
November highlights
1. I had a Strategic Planning & Transportation Committee and a Housing Committee on 12th and 14th November, and also the Planning Applications Committee on the 20th. However, to be honest there was not really much to report and no very significant planning permissions this month – except, that is, for the dire likely consequences of the so-called welfare reforms and just some of these were considered by the Housing Committee.
I know, of course, that welfare spending is not currently very popular with the public at large but I hope that here in Latchmere we know some of the real consequences of these cuts. What is clear from reports to Council is that the Town Hall officers expect an increase in the number of families made homeless because of the impact of housing allowance cuts as well as penalties for those, who “under-occupy” their council flats. They expect that some families will have to be re-housed well outside of the London area and indeed I already know of one single mother who has been placed in Loughton in Essex, despite the fact that her sons attend a primary school in Tooting!
2. I went to the opening of 39 new Council-built flats on the Doddington and Rollo estate on the 22nd November. You may have seen them being built alongside the railway track between CJ and Queenstown Road station. Here is a picture of them close up. They are the first purpose built council flats in Wandsworth since the early 80s and although a very small gesture towards the housing crisis, I must say they appeared very well designed and built.
3. I am afraid that I did not get to the Women of Wandsworth AGM or the London Summit but I did attend a couple of important Battersea Park School governor meetings. The school is struggling with its “failure” to achieve Academy status this year and is now faced with a period of uncertainty as it appears as though the only way to be certain of its future is for its results to get worse, in which case it would automatically become an Academy. NO, you didn’t read that incorrectly. Under the perverse incentives that the Government has imposed on schools there is an advantage, if you think it is an advantage of course, for your school to do badly in exam results in order to become an Academy! You couldn’t make it up, could you!
4. Last month, I reported that nearly 6,000 of the Council’s 18,000 odd leasehold properties are not lived in by the actual leaseholder, or to be absolutely precise they have their management mail from the Council sent to different addresses. I said that one leaseholder owns over 90 ex-Council properties, and whilst he is in a “class” of his own, 17 others own more than 10 each.Well, I have been doing some work on the information that I have got and it is clear that there are networks of private landlords operating on Council estates, with some flats “owned” by husbands and wives, brothers and sisters, and City holding companies. Frankly I find this an astonishing racket with hundreds of “landlords” making profit rents from Council-built and subsidised dwellings!
My Programme for December
1. I went to the Doddington Estate Garden Xmas fete on Saturday 1st December and the Policeman’s Ball on the Saturday evening. Here I am photographed joining in the carol singing at the Fete, whilst much to my astonishment I won a painting of B
attersea Power Station at the Policeman’s Ball and so December has started festively!
2. There is a Council Meeting on Wednesday 5th, where the main subject of discussion will be the benefit cuts, the housing crisis and the Chancellor’s autumn statement and its impact on Wandsworth’s budget.
3. On the 10th I intend to go to the opening run of the new rail service from Clapham Junction through south and east London to Highbury and Islington. This will complete London’s orbital rail line, which was first talked about in the late nineteenth century following the success of the Metropolitan and Circle tube lines. Well, here it is well over a century later and the orbital route has arrived! The best description of it, I have found is at http://www.therailengineer.com/2012/11/02/london-orbital-rail-network-complete/.
4. Apart from these events there are as you may imagine lots of festive drinks and fetes that councillors get invited to run by resident organisations, school groups and others. I look forward to seeing some of you at some of these occasions!
Did you know?
About “Movember”, the November prostate cancer awareness campaign, the idea for which came out of an Australian pub about 5 years back and now has millions of men supporting it by growing moustaches and beards in the month of November.
Well I decided to join in despite protests from some quarters and this is how it looked on December 1st and whilst for me it is not an original look – there is quite an amusing picture of me in the archives with long hair, moustache and beard from way back – it was a bit of a shock for some.
It has now gone – to be repeated next year? We will have to wait and see but in any event I raised some small amount of money for the Prostate Cancer Awareness Campaign.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere November Newsletter (# 43)
October highlights
1. I received a couple of comments following last month’s newsletter
about my failure to mention the campaign about the Adventure Playgrounds in York Gardens, Battersea Park and Kimber Road – and sadly the demolition pictured here. This was obviously a mistake and I apologise for the omission, but I can only say that I thought the “Pay to Play” campaign had had more publicity than any issue I can recall since the battle to save York Gardens Library. If you want to see some of the comments made by me and my colleagues then take a look at this blog: http://labourinwandsworth.wordpress.com/
However, whilst I am on the issue, I see absolutely no indication of any change of mind from the Tory Party in Council.
2. Congratulations to York Gardens Library, which was last month awarded £5,000 from the Lloyds Banking Group’s Community Fund. I know from Wendy Speck, who is on the steering group that there is still much work to be done to make the Library self-sustaining but this is an excellent step in the right direction.
3. October’s Council Meeting produced a couple of facts worth mentioning. Firstly it turns out that 105 people working for the Council earn less than the London Living Wage (LLW). I have a list of the jobs that they do and although I cannot be certain it looks to me as though almost all are women workers. I don’t want to be sexist and one can’t be certain but as half of them are “Carers” working in Adult Services and many of the rest are cleaners and cooks, I think it is a pretty fair guess.
It would cost the Council less than £60,000 pa to become a LLW employer; that is something like 25% of the Chief Executive’s salary. This is an idea “whose time has come” according to PM David Cameron. And yet I have it on pretty good authority that the Tory councillors have considered the matter and rejected it – so much for us all being in this together!
4. Secondly it turns out that nearly 6,000 of the Council’s 18,000 odd leasehold properties are not lived in by the actual leaseholder, or to be absolutely precise they have their management mail from the Council sent to different addresses. The Council believes that this means they are probably let to private tenants. One leaseholder owns over 90 ex-Council properties, and whilst he is in a “class” of his own, 17 others own more than 10 each.
Surely when the “Right To Buy” policy was introduced and the Council started its aggressive sales policies it was not their intention to create at least 17 multi-millionaires and to jack up rents on the estates from the Council’s rent levels of roughly £200 per week to the private sector’s £500+ per week.
I suspect that this was very much a case of introducing a policy, which has had unintended consequences. And one, which as the lack of affordable housing becomes ever more acute, has become more and more serious.
5. The October Planning Applications Committee had absolutely no application of any major significance to Latchmere (there was one application for a roof extension).
6. On Saturday, 20th October, I went on the TUC march for jobs from Blackfriars to Hyde Park. The picture shows me and my colleagues with the Battersea Labour Party banner in Hyde Park. I thought the lack of media coverage was pretty disgraceful, given that there must have been 200,000 people there – I know the Met estimated 100,000 but I have never seen that many people at a big sports event and I have been to one or two.
7. I went, along with the Battersea Society, to see Benjamin Franklin’s House. For those of you, who do not know the history Ben Franklin was a British patriot living in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the eighteenth century. Britain was faced with the problems of ruling the 13 colonies from 3,000 miles away and as the conflicts grew Franklin decided that independence was the only practical conclusion. He had a hand in writing the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution.
H
e was, however, also a polymath. He invented the lightening conductor and was an early experimenter in electricity. He invented a musical instrument and was in effect both US ambassador to France and to Britain. He was at the Treaty of Paris in 1783, which established the USA in international circles. And his picture adorns this US $100 bill
His house is an original eighteenth century mansion in Craven Street, right next to Trafalgar Square and if you want an interesting hour and a half visit I thoroughly recommend it. It is brilliantly “enacted”.
My Programme for November
1. I have a Strategic Planning & Transportation Committee (I know it is a pompous title, but it’s not mine!) and a Housing Committee on 12th and 14th November. There is the Planning Applications Committee on the 20th.
2. I hope to get to the Women of Wandsworth AGM on 26th November and I have a couple of important Battersea Park School governor meetings this month. I also intend to go to either the London Summit, which is a large London-wide Conference for all councillors in London about various issues of concern to us all – no doubt mainly discussing the financial cuts being imposed across the city.
Did you know?
Last month I wrote about North and South Lodge in Latchmere Road, but now thanks to one of you I can say a lot more about these two buildings and what a fascinating story it is too!
On 25th March, 1836, the Wandsworth and Clapham Poor Law Union was formed. It’s job was to build and run workhouses for the poor. It was run by an elected Board of Guardians, representing its 6 constituent parishes, Battersea (3 governors), Clapham (6), Putney (2), Streatham (2), Tooting Graveney (2), Wandsworth (4).
By the end of the nineteenth century, Wandsworth and Clapham was London’s largest union, with a population of more than 350,000 — a twelfth of the capital’s total. The Wandsworth and Clapham Union was renamed the Wandsworth Union in 1904.
Like other London unions, Wandsworth & Clapham operated a number of relief offices and dispensaries. And in 1886, a new purpose-built combined relief station and dispensary was erected on Latchmere Road, Battersea. The building was our North and South Lodge and much more – see the picture. It was Battersea’s very own workhouse – a reminder of a grim past!
This is Architect, T.W. Aldwinckle’s design for what was known as the Latchmere Road dispensary and relief station.
Timon of Athens, starring Simon Russell Beale or Shakespeare on today’s political dynamic
I saw this late Shakespeare play at the Olivier last night (22/10/12). I will leave it to the professionals to review Beale’s performance, safe to say that he was brilliant, but I want to talk about the play.
Surely this is Shakespeare’s least known play, and perhaps deservedly so. The ending is a dramatic failure; the character development is limited at least by the bard’s standards. What is more in the whole play I did not recognise a single quote or aphorism. You know how it is in a normal Shakespeare play – that instant recognition – Oh, that’s where that phrase comes from. But not once did this happen in Timon.
What was striking was the central role of money. Unlike any other of his plays, money is the oil, the black, nasty, sickly sweet blood pumping through the whole play corrupting first the rich, lazy, feckless rich living off Timon’s generosity; then Timon himself as he corrupts the artists living off his wealth and then as he abuses the power that it gives him; then the rich and mean, who refuse to bail him out of debt; then the rabble, who want to foment a revolution but have neither the discipline or the skills to do so, and finally the revolutionary leader, the Stalin as I saw him, who like all the rest sold out to the power that is – money.
The tragedy was set in Athens and played rather poignantly in modern day Athens and for anyone who has been there recently (I was there at Xmas 2010) the rubbish strewn, graffiti blown, wreckage of a great city was all too real. However, the first scenes are in Timon’s luxurious mansion, where he is surrounded by his sycophantic, rich, scrounger friends. He believes himself to be “wealthy in my friends”. They marvel at his honour, his generosity; they thank him for buying their debts, providing their dowries. I felt it to be a Shakespearean commentary on the celebrity culture, but perhaps that is a little anachronistic.
Timon’s descent to the slums is tragic and his acceptance of it and his rejection of humanity, his bitter hatred understandable given the rejection he faces from the beneficiaries of his gifts. The self-righteous, self-serving, posturising of these n’ever-do-wells had me in mind of Wandsworth Tories on a bad day. I particularly liked the woman, who would have paid off all his debts if only he had asked her first rather than leaving her to the end of the queue of requests. I rather felt with Timon. He walked off to his death, though how and by what agency it is not clear.
Meanwhile the beggars, who stole gold from him go off to fight, untold but no doubt to the death after the trio in Chaucer’s Miller’s Tale, the rich and powerful oligarchy re-establish the control of the state and the leader of the rabble join them, no doubt to become the strong man, the Stalin, of the re-imposed state.
It is a bitter and black tale, in which money plays “the universal whore, the universal pimp of men and peoples” as Karl Marx wrote in an 1844 review. But it is also a play with some relevance to the modern day as we see austerity bringing Athens to its knees, and the British version of austerity imposing massive housing benefit cuts only months after riots in the streets.
I don’t think I had Shakespeare down as such a socialist, even if a rather pessimistic one, until I saw Beale’s riveting performance as Timon of Athens.
Tory Housing Policy – Wandsworth style
Wandsworth Tories, along with quite a few other Councils, some Labour as well as Tory, I am afraid, continue to attack the security and stability of council housing. Only last week (17/10/12) they decided to introduce short-term tenancies. Short-term is defined as 5 year limited tenancy agreements.
There are many problems with this policy, which superficially is designed to increase mobility on council estates and free up properties for those in genuine housing need. After all, it is argued, the housing is allocated in the first place on the basis of need, usually lack of money or overcrowding of families, and the only case for moving tenants out after 5 years is that their need might have become less.
The argument presumably goes that if family circumstances have changed then the family no longer needs the letting and the letting should be freed up for new, deserving cases. But this creates some very perverse incentives. Assuming the tenants have established themselves and are putting down roots in their community and don’t want to be evicted from their homes for the last 5 years, then their logical course of action would be to ensure that they do not earn any more money or they increase their family size.
We have all heard the standard Tory complaint that working class girls only get pregnant so that they can get a council house and that many tenants are in effect work-shy layabouts. But right now in Wandsworth, and across the country, policies are being introduced, which almost demand pregnancies or avoidance of promotion or overtime working, in order to avoid eviction.
In order to carry out the policy, the Council will require staff, whose main function will be to check that tenants are not getting too wealthy. The Tory claim that Labour encourages the nanny state will look pathetic in comparison with the snooping, busy-bodying council they wish to create. And the objective? To create a transient population with no incentive to develop within their local community or a pauperised one with no ability or maybe desire to do so? Surely not!
Tory Tea Party
I don’t like the lazy assumption that the UK follows the US if about 10 years behind, but if you saw as much of the Republican Convention and of the Tory Party Conference as I did then you could not help thinking that the Tories are indeed morphing into Republicans. The Tories do make better speeches; their sentences usually have verbs and, pairs of sentences usually fit together as something like a paragraph – all of which would have been pretty remarkable for the Republicans.
But they both rely on the flag and quite a lot on God; they both want to shoot a burglar and “reform” abortion law, they both would like to drone attack Iran and they both claim that wealth generation and all that makes life worth living is as a result of the private sector. In the Tories’ case this all magnificently came together in the Olympics.
That the Olympics was the single largest public sector investment of the century, that the army had to bail out G4S and that most of the athletes were, by historic standards, magnificently funded by the state (or the lottery) seems to have escaped their attention. But don’t let the facts spoil a good story!
The same old boring incantation came out as ever. State bad, private good
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere October Newsletter (# 42)
August & September highlights
1. Well to be honest highlights were mainly holidays, the Olympics and the Labour Party Conference – OK, so one has to be a political nerd to call the latter a highlight but so be it! As for my holiday, well I won’t bore you with lots of holiday snaps but here are just two of Niagara Falls and a Canadian native!
2. As for the Olympics – in my August Newsletter, I reported on going down to Putney High Street to see the road race pass, but later in the same month, I also managed to get tickets for a few other events. Surprisingly, to me, my favourite event was the female weight-lifting – absolutely terrific, with plenty of crowd participation. I know one Egyptian lady would not have lifted the weight without the crowd willing her to succeed.
3. For those who know me you may be surprised that on August 18th I went to the Black Pride event at the Ministry of Sound! The Ministry is in Kennington and the event was a raucous, hot enjoyable event. OK, so I was hardly an average member of the audience but I was not as much out of the ordinary as I had expected, with plenty of other “mature” participants. Not, however, my cup of tea and I have too much respect for my ear-drums to have stayed long!
4. On 21st August a Council Committee decided to keep the in-house team in the bidding to run both Croydon’s and Wandsworth’s library services. The Council contract will include running the York Gardens Library. I know that many people, including in the Labour Party, do not think that it is that important to keep these services in-house, but I most certainly do so. I will be keeping fingers and toes crossed for the next stage of the bidding process, which will become public in November.
5. There have, of course, been two Planning Applications Committees since my last newsletter, one in August and the other in September, and perhaps unusually both had applications of interest, even if small to Latchmere. First of all was the Council’s own application to convert the health centre in Wheeler Court to six Council flats. Wheeler Court is the 4-storey block in Plough Road right next to the traffic lights at York Road. The second was another Council application to convert Dawes House, that is the small block right opposite the Grant Road exit from the station and next to the Nazarene Church, into accommodation for homeless families rather than leave them in the inhuman conditions of bed & breakfast accommodation. Two good and useful applications for affordable housing, both of which were passed.
6. On September 25th I had the Strategic Planning Committee and on 26th the Housing Committee – two busy evenings. The Planning Committee included the latest plans for the Thames Relief Tunnel, which will run alongside the Thames for 20 miles and is designed to prevent the occasional disastrous flooding, which causes serious river pollution and the deaths of millions of fish. One of the base stations for this work is likely to be the Falconbrook Pumping Station, pictured here behind the demolished remnants of York Gardens Adventure Playground. All three of your councillors recognise that this mammoth Tunnel is required but we will be fighting to ensure that there is as little disruption to the Gardens as possible, so, for example, construction traffic will be coming in on a new access direct from York Road and not through the estate and the Gardens. What with the threat to the Library and the closure of the playground, York Gardens has had more than its fair share of pressure in the last few months!
7. In September I also went to the Wandsworth Museum to see the exhibition of Painting Wandsworth. The museum has 300 water-colours of Wandsworth and the exhibition showed about 60 of the paintings. The paintings date back to the eighteenth century, though most are nineteenth century works, but for anyone with a passing interest in the history of Battersea, then do go. I know the Museum is slightly out of the way being in the old West Hill Library but it is only 5 minutes’ walk up the hill from the Southside shopping centre and well worth the walk. There are also lots of buses from Clapham Junction that stop almost outside it, e.g. 37, 337, 170. It also shares the building with the brilliant de Morgan exhibition, which as I have said before is a small but world class exhibit that highly recommend to everyone.
I include two of the paintings. The first, this early nineteenth century picture of the Prince’s Head in Latchmere, which used to stand on the corner of Falcon Road and Battersea Park Road (though neither called that at the time, of course). 
And the second is of the Arts Centre, then Battersea Town Hall, which judging by the car, the tram and the fashions must have been painted about 100 years ago – say 1910. Note the Shakespeare Theatre next door, which was unfortunately badly damaged in the war and demolished in 1954. It is now Foxtons, the estate agent!
My Programme for October
1. There is a Council Meeting on 17th October and the Planning Applications Committee on the 18th October.
2. There must be more but just back from the Labour Party Conference and I do not seem yet to have got back into the full swing of Council business!
Did you know?
That Latchmere has a large, stately home or so says both our local and national press, when covering the strange Chinese murder trial of Gu Kailai. You may recall that this was the August trial of the Chinese politician’s wife found guilty of murdering British businessman Neil Heywood. Mr. Heywood, it was reported, had in his youth lived in Latchmere’s large stately home known as South Lodge.
Well, here is South Lodge (the red brick house), on the Latchmere Road right opposite the Leisure Centre. It is divided into 5 flats and pleasant enough I guess but a large, stately home? Just teaches one not to believe everything one reads in the press!
Top Hat
I went to the musical, Top Hat, last week. Great stuff.
I am a bit of a fan of Astaire and Rogers and was a little concerned that the show could not possibly compare with the film. But I was wrong – scintillating stuff, imaginatively staged and beautifully played – especially by Ginger Rogers/Summer Strallen. The second act staged in Venice could not quite compare with either the first act set in London or the film version but that is a harsh judgement on a great show.
Interesting though that the West End should be playing Singin’ in the Rain and Top Hat – the two greatest films from the two most brilliant dancers, Fred Astaire and Gene Kelly – right now. Many have made the point that the great Hollywood era of musicals and comedies coincided with the great Depression – even if Singin’ made in 1952 is a bit outside the period. And now as the world faces the greatest financial storm since then we have these two revivals and the Olympics. As Nero said about the plebs of Rome – give ’em bread and circuses.
One thing in common in both crises is and was a Conservative Government pursuing negative, cutting policies. Cameron and Osborne do not understand that reducing demand by cutting Government spending does nothing but worsen the crisis. In the thirties, of course, GB finally moved out of the depression not by worrying about debt but by responding to the threat from Nazi Germany. Our parents and grandparents did not worry about the national debt – thank goodness and had no choice but to leave the next generation to pay off war-time debt, which we only completed about 10 years ago.
Heaven forbid – we don’t need war but we do need to get rid of this incompetent, deeply reactionary Government as soon as possible. After the Olympics the economy is going to be in serious need of stimulation and if we are to avoid a triple dip recession then we need aggressive investment and a quick reversal of all Osborn’s cuts.
My Latchmere August Newsletter (#40)
July highlights
1. On July 4th I went to a Labour Party fund raiser at the Fish in a Tie restaurant in Falcon Road, 
where the guest speaker was Andy Burnham, Labour’s Shadow Health Minister. As you know I don’t make this newsletter a party political broadcast – far too boring – but I must say that Andy was on great form. He was interested to see the new Clapham Junction Health Centre, as he came to open the centre with me when it was in a couple of mobile caravans in the nearby car park just before the last election. By the way, if you haven’t been there, can I recommend the Fish in a Tie as one of the best, at very reasonable prices, restaurants in our ward.
Another thing Andy s
aw was the newly re-opened entrance to Clapham Junction station. Some of you complained about the length of time the work took but I think everyone will agree that the new entrance (pictured here) is a terrific improvement on what was there previously.
2. Last month I commented that the British economy was now officially in what is known as a “double-dip recession”. Unfortunately with both Government and Council pursuing a crazy deflationary policy there seems little prospect of pulling out of it and indeed I have heard some talk about a “triple-dip recession.” The result in Latchmere was yet another rise of 10 in the ward’s official unemployment numbers, with 330 men and 230 women unemployed.
3. The Planning Applications Committee on 18th July had one application of real local interest and that was the one about the re-development of Clapham Junction’s Peabody Estate at the top of St. John’s Hill. Local residents were very actively opposed to the application, including as it does a 12 storey block and 527 residential units. Their opposition was partly based on the traffic implications on Eckstein, Comyn and Severus Roads, partly on the sheer scale of the application and partly on the size of the 12 storey block. One of the problems about the height of the tallest block is, for me, that it is not only that high but that it is at the top of the hill and will, therefore, dominate everything on the south side of the railway lines. I joined, with senior Tory councillor Maurice Heaster in opposing the application but I am afraid the very many local residents in the public gallery were disappointed.
4. On 19th July we had the Latchmere Report Back Meeting at York Gardens Library, There was a large audience and the normal range of questions about housing, pavements, street cleaning and refuse collection but what made it unusual was the decision by the pressure group London Citizens to make it a “protest” against the Council’s cuts policies. This meant that what is usually a time for the local councillors to be asked and answer questions about the local ward, became a quizzing of Tory Council Leader, Ravi Govindia.
5. I am afraid that I did not attend the Poyntz Road/Knowsley Road Triangle Party on 7th July. I am afraid I chickened out when the heavens opened and rained on what for me is the best street party in the Borough.
My Programme for August
1. Well, to be honest what with personal holidays and the Olympics – I went down to Putney High Street to see the road race pas
s, not the greatest picture but there it is! – it doesn’t add up to much at all, but I will be interested to see exactly what is going to happen to the Borough’s Library services. On 21st August a Council Committee will be considering the next stage in the “contracting out” of the Borough’s boundaries. Anyone who knows me will know what I think about contracting out core services like Libraries but I am rather afraid that it does not look good for our service, which I expect to be contracted out to some multi-national services provider.
2. I am not back from holiday until 11th September and so next month’s newsletter will not be in the first week of the month!
Did you know?
Last month I mentioned that the Falcons used to be Wandsworth Council’s Livingstone Estate and that Peregrine House used to be called Burne-Jones Court, after the painter Edward Burne-Jones. Well to continue the parade, Griffon House, which of course was demolished to make way for the Imperial College student residencies was called Elgar Court.
Sir Edward William Elgar (2 June 1857 – 23 February 1934) was, of course, the famous English composer, many of whose works have entered the British and international classical concert repertoire. His best known works are the Enigma Variations, and most notably the Pomp and Circumstance Marches, both regulars at the Promenade Concerts. And for those of you who have forgotten Pomp & Circumstance then here it is on U-Tube www.youtube.com/watch?v=moL4MkJ-aLk
One of the most notable features about Elgar, pictured right, was that he was one of the first “classical” composers to take modern recording methods seriously. In a period from 1914-1925 he made several recordings but when in 1925 the microphone was invented he started a recording of all his works and hence has a fair claim to be the first composer to have had all his works recorded in his own lifetime.
Why the Council named the Livingstone blocks after artists like Burne-Jones and Elgar (with more to come), will be the subject of a later Newsletter.
Tony Belton
Tony Belton 