In Praise of Brian Barnes (20/8/1944-28/11/2021) – An Appreciation
by Tony Belton
The Western “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” had a title that so appealed to Brian Barnes that he used it for his first and largest mural, which he painted on an insignificant but very long wall facing onto Battersea Bridge Road. The mural was recorded as being 276 feet long and 18 feet high. It was Brian’s signature mural and it was the only mural, as I remember it, that hit the front pages of The Sunday Times and The Observer and maybe even The Sunday Telegraph, when both wall and mural were demolished in 1977.
I was Wandsworth’s Chair of Planning at the time and appeared as a bit part, along with the Planning Director and several notorious local Tories, in what Brian considered to be the Ugly, and less effective part of the mural – the modern, chaotic present. The Bad was, of course, the magnificent depiction of the old, noxious, nineteenth-century industries being swept away by a massive broom. The Good is inevitably the new rosy future for Battersea, as he sees it: smiling mothers and children playing in a colourful park, adorned with daffodils.
Brian later called his art ‘realistic’ and ‘naturalistic’; he claimed to be influenced by Renaissance painters. Certainly, this great mural had similarities to Hieronymus Bosch’s interpretation of Heaven and Hell [The Garden of Earthly Delights, painted between 1490 and 1500]. Yet, whilst I have the impression that Bosch rather enjoyed painting the evils of hell and found heaven boring, Brian revelled in the bold, bright, colours and shapes of a rather simple heaven/future. He was, what I might call a Naïve Futurist.
The day the wall was demolished, the demolition crews started their work at 3.00am, so that when Brian arrived there was not much left. But he climbed on top of the remnants, where he screamed and hollered his protest, like a mother defending her child – it had, after all, been his baby for over a year of work. Traffic was held up for 13 hours that day.
Thankfully, there are other Barnes murals to be seen and admired. My favourite is called Battersea in Perspective and is in Dagnall Street on the wall of what used to be the Haberdashers’ Arms. It is a prime example of Brian’s vision of public murals. It is a very large and bold, colourful and political, historical and highly referenced, visual tour of Battersea. The nine portraits at the bottom of the picture (sorry about the car) are important Battersea MPs: John Burns, Sapurji Saklatvala, Caroline Ganley, Douglas Jay and Alf Dubs; other significant Battersea politicians John Archer and Charlotte Despard; plus aeronautical pioneers: Hilda Hewlett and A(lliott) V(erdon) Roe. Battersea Park and the Peace Pagoda make a bold focal point, bordered by Albert and Chelsea Bridges. The Power Station and the Carey Gardens estate, where Brian lived, also appear.
And in a reference to the Renaissance paintings, that Brian admired, we can see not only one of the early planes, built in some of Battersea’s railway arches and a hot air balloon; but also the motif from an Iron Age shield, found in the Thames off Battersea Bridge in 1857 and now to be seen in the British Museum.
Photo and © Tony Belton; resized by Tomos Jones |
There are other major Barnes murals in south London: all of them notable for their sheer size, colour, boldness, political content and community involvement. Some of the most notable are Brixton’s (Coldharbour Lane) Nuclear Dawn; Stockwell tube station’s War Memorial; and Battersea’s (Carey Gardens) A Brief History of Time and Thessaly Road’s A Day at the Seaside.
Brian Barnes constantly involved school kids, local people and local personalities in the design and execution of his murals. He lived for his art and I remember that he told me once of his plan to go to Bahia Blanca, a city on the east coast of Argentina, to an international festival of murals. The plan was that this otherwise undistinguished city would allocate one wall each to 50 international artists, invited to decorate the city. It was a wonderful plan, which anyone who knew Brian would know that he’d have loved. It would also have expanded his artistic experience and range. But, as so often, the problem was money. Neither Brian nor Bahia were rich and the artists had to be self-funded!
There was another side to Brian and that was his life as a political activist. In 1983 he became the inspirational genius behind the Battersea Power Station Action Group (BPAG). BPAG, he told me some 10 years ago, met weekly for over 30 years with Brian creating the agenda, writing the minutes and basically running the show – all that takes some doing. He was also a long-term executive member of the Doddington and Rollo Community Association (DRCA) and an active participant in many local campaigns and issues. He was frequently enthusiastically articulate about his very particular viewpoint. However, as the chair of several of these sessions, particularly at the DRCA, I’d have to say that Brian was not always very concerned with achieving consensus. The vehemence of his passion did not make for practical success in everyday politics, nor on occasions for civilised debate. But it made great street art.
RIP Brian Barnes, committed community activist and great muralist.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea December 2021, Newsletter (# 150)
- Living through, what is hopefully the nearest thing to the Plague we will ever know, is certainly an experience – even if, one we would have wished to miss. But it is almost unfathomably personal, depending upon family life, age, life situation, wealth, location, occupation, etc., etc. I am talking from one tiny segment of the population. The comfortably off, owner-occupying, socially established, mature population. Though, even here the range of reactions are massive. My partner, Penny is putting nose to the grindstone, churning out books – actually enjoying not going to the cinema or to the noisy restaurant. Me? I am kind of reducing risk factors to a degree; going out a bit but happy to have an excuse not to. Many of my peer group have hardly stuck their heads out of the door and yet others, within Government restrictions, are flying the world almost regardless of the climate crisis and COP26.
- Lots of past generations, of course, have had their trials. My parents, for example, spent most of their twenties separated by war, and their parents, my grandparents, suffered the more deadly 1914-18 War AND the deadliest of modern pandemics, the 1918 so-called flu epidemic. My peer group appears to me to be uniquely lucky to have been born into Welfare State Britain and now, many of us, comfortably off as we enter a Climate Crisis through a Pandemic. And yet we can be so complacent and mean about it, when we should be generous and open about our good fortune. (One or two caveats, even for my generation: it is so important to be busy and, hopefully, not unhappily lonely).
- November started with me being pinged and self-isolating, so I missed Wandsworth’s Civic Awards and a couple of social events. However, I was clear for a grand Labour Party event at the Park Plaza Hotel, Waterloo. I, and a dozen other Labour councillors, were the guests of Cllr Peter Carpenter at a celebration of Labour and its associated SME (Small and Medium-sized enterprises) members. SME business is not generally thought of us as a home base for Labour, which is more frequently associated with Trade Unions and large, smoke-stack or nationalised businesses. SME4Labour is however a vibrant new part of the Labour Party, very much inspired by first-generation Brits, who have made good. A high point of the evening was Leonie Cooper’s award as Greater London Member of the Year. Congratulations to Leonie, who as many of you will recall, was a Latchmere councillor before moving to Tooting in 2010.
- On 11th November, Penny and I flew to Copenhagen for the Annual Meeting of the Danish Eighteenth-Century History Society, where she was the keynote speaker. I wanted us to avoid air flights – if possible, but discovered that it was practically impossible. There used to be a ferry from Newcastle to Esbjerg on the Danish west coast, followed by a simple train ride to Copenhagen. But cheap airfares have undermined that ferry’s economic viability. And the only real alternative is a 36 hour trip by ferry to Rotterdam and a combination of rail journeys across Holland and Northern Germany and finally Denmark. How can we truly face up to the climate crisis when the Government not only continues to subsidise air travel, but actually increases its subsidies as Chancellor Sunak has just done to the detriment of rail and ferry services? Is this Government serious about anything?
- On the 12th we went for a long walk through central Copenhagen. It’s such a quiet, well-behaved city compared with noisy, rumbustious London. There are
famous tourist spots like Nyhaven (Newhaven – pictured here), pedestrianised streets and thousands of cyclists. But the cyclists somehow belong to a different era from here in London. They are not Lycra-clad speedsters but sit-up-and-beg shoppers with shopping baskets. But before some of my cycle-loving colleagues get too envious of Denmark, I should point out that British pedestrians would never tolerate the inequities meted out to pedestrians in Copenhagen – no minimum width of pavements, no protection against parked cars or bikes, no control over obstructions. The pedestrian really is at the bottom of the pile. - The lecture and the guest appearance of the International President, Penny, went well and so, I must
say, did the delightful socialising on both of our evenings
there. On the 14th before our return home, we went for a tour of the Fredericksburg Gardens, a Hyde Park equivalent attached to the Palace, pictured here. But the stars of the afternoon were in the elephant enclosure of the neighbouring zoo, which is clearly visible from the Gardens. We were entertained by two elephant teenagers, who were intent on pushing each other into a pond they shared with plenty of ducks, who sensibly kept their distance! - We returned home on the 14th but what a hassle! On the way out, we had a saga of problems. And, as for returning, our efforts to complete the correct forms on strange computer keyboards, to satisfy the Covid inspectors and, and …… led us to conclude that foreign trips of less than at least two weeks are just off the agenda for the foreseeable… And, moreover, we got pinged again two days later, presumably because of someone we met/passed at Heathrow!
- On the 15th, the day before I went into self-isolation for a second time, I had a meeting of the Wandsworth Conservation Area Advisory Committee (WCAAC). I have mentioned this committee before but not discussed it much. It is a very worthy group of local amenity groups, who advise the Council on potential developments in Conservation Areas and who, unsurprisingly, usually have a conservative outlook on developments. On this occasion, the main discussion was about the proposed development of the All England Tennis Club into and over the area of what is now the Wimbledon Park Golf Club. Whilst that is of little direct interest to Battersea, I know many “Wimbledon” fans will be fascinated. In essence, the Championship is doubling in size; the qualifying tournament will be held on-site and not as now in Roehampton; it will provide many, many more practice courts (apparently compared to the other majors the lack of practice facilities is a “scandal”); it will also ease the obvious “wear and tear” pressures of playing on grass as opposed to hard courts. As a by-product, much of the current golf course will also become a genuine park rather than an effectively private open space. The proposals looked good, but, of course, the plans still need close scrutiny.
- Once again self-isolation meant that I did not attend November’s Planning Applications Committee on the 23rd, except in Zoom-mode. In every other respect, it was also like October’s PAC – there was nothing exciting on the agenda; it was mundane; it was ordinary; it was part of the bread-and-butter of local government and it was very well done
with thought and care. I was again impressed by the quality of the councillors’ involvement and contribution. - Some months ago the Battersea Park Rotary Club invited me to talk at their weekly lunch-time meeting on 25th My topic was “50 years of life as a councillor”. The lunch was at Wright’s, one of the new restaurants in the Battersea Power Station development. I thought the talk went quite well; the Rotarians said it did; but then they would, wouldn’t they? Here I am after the event with Rotarian President Senja Dedic.
- Whilst I was there, I was struck by the sight of the
Power Station. Since I was last there it has taken on the looks of a completely new building, in sparkling condition and almost ready for its new life as a town centre, full of shops, living and work. It was, as you can see, a brilliant day: bright and very cold and the Power Station looked at its best. I got into a discussion with two friends, who work there and who are very committed to its success. I suspect I irritated, or annoyed, them with my scepticism about the plan for what is being called “a new town centre”. Personally, as yet I find the development a tad sterile; it’s certainly acquiring some of the patina of success, but there isn’t any authentic urban life there. I hope that I am wrong but ..? - The 25th was also the day of a by-election in Wandsworth’s Bedford ward. Congratulations to Labour’s Sheila Boswell, who won by one vote! I suspect that both Tory and Labour parties were almost equally surprised by the result. Labour was certainly. And presumably, the Tories were a bit sickened, having got so close. It will have done no harm as long as the obvious lessons are learnt, starting with the very clear one that the electorate is not quite as keen on turning out for what will seem to many as meaningless by-elections even if we, active practitioners, think they are important. On the following Sunday, 60-70 Labour stalwarts zoomed their collective frustrations and irritations in a solemn post mortem.
- On the last day of the month, news broke that local artist and political campaigner, Brian Barnes had died. I first met Brian during the Battersea Society’s campaign “to save” Albert Bridge. It was under assault from modern traffic, which its nineteenth-century designers hadn’t anticipated. It was a story very familiar to modern Londoners in the form of similar arguments about Hammersmith Bridge. Demolition and reconstruction was, of course, the “rationalists’” answer but they had not allowed for campaigners, who commissioned the young, unknown Battersea artist, Brian Barnes, to design several beautiful posters in defence of the bridge. An agreed compromise was the largely unnoticed but successful buttress under the bridge’s central span. It has now been there for 50+ years.
- Way back then, I was Chair of Planning and later the Opposition lead on planning, when his most famous mural was designed, created and demolished. The mural, “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”, was a massive 150 feet long, 18 feet high (45 metre by 5.50 metre) political statement of how he, and some others of us, would have liked Battersea to become. A great broom was sweeping away all the noxious industries of nineteenth-century Battersea and replacing them with smiling children and nice new homes. But, like medieval paintings of heaven and hell, Brian had much more fun painting the ‘bad’ than he did the ‘good’ – after all, one set of smiling children in a flower garden doesn’t cover much of 150 feet. I am proud to claim a small role in the artwork, as Brian included me and Wandsworth’s then Director of Planning, Mike Tapsell, on the mural, being tossed about in what was a figurative tide of rampant capitalism. Four Tory councillors, led by Chris Chope (now Sir Christopher Chope, the notorious right-wing Tory MP) also starred in the painting. Unfortunately, the demolition men gave it short shrift when building today’s Morgan’s Walk.
- My favourite Barnes mural is called Battersea
in Perspective and is in Dagnall Street on the wall of what used to be the Haberdashers’ Arms, now converted into flats. The mural is a visual tour of Battersea, from Roman jewellery found in the Thames to Battersea Park’s Peace Pagoda. It demands a detailed description, but, as this photo shows, it is also difficult to picture, whilst retaining the correct perspective. - There was another side to Brian and that was his life as a political activist. In the early 80’s he was the inspirational genius behind the Battersea Power Station Action Group (BPAG). BPAG, he told me some 10 years ago, met weekly for over 20 years with Brian creating the agenda, writing the minutes and basically running the show – that takes some doing. He was also a long-term executive member of the Doddington and Rollo Community Association (DRCA). I was chair of the DRCA for some years around the turn of the century and I can vouch for the fact that Brian was a very idiosyncratic, and not always easy, member of the association – at least from the chair’s perspective! RIP Brian Barnes, committed community activist and great muralist.
- Finally, can I urge you all to get fully vaccinated – if not for yourself then for your friends and family, who deserve not to be infected by a disease that you might otherwise be carrying. To my mind, refusing to get vaccinated is not a display of sturdy individualism but rather an anti-social indulgence.
My Programme for December
- Omicron looks likely to destroy much of my Christmas, and I am afraid maybe yours as well. I very much hope that I am wrong but the sudden appearance in late November of this new strain of Coronavirus, and the threat of other variants to come suggests to me that there must be more lockdowns to come.
- That will leave me with a meeting of the North-East Surrey Crematorium Board on the 7th December, a Labour Councillors’ Group on the 9th, the Council Meeting on the 15th and the Planning Applications Committee on the 16th.
- As for the festivities themselves: I have the usual round of potential parties, but how many happen, or I go to I am not sure. Only one has been cancelled so far!

Did you Know?
Last month I asked, whether you knew this local horse trough, which I had noticed the previous month. The answer is that it stands on Trinity Road, outside the County Arms.
And this month?

Many of you will know this building: Foxtons, large, modern office block on the corner of Theatre Street and Lavender Hill. But do you know what was there before being severely bomb-damaged in the 1940s and demolished in the 1950s? You might find a bardic clue in the address.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea November 2021, Newsletter (# 149)
- September was hectic; October was both quieter and yet more challenging! During years in politics, I have been “interviewed” at more than 40 selection meetings prior to standing for election. This kind of competition is not unique to politics; but it always means competing with close colleagues and friends. That is stressful and the track record shows I have a mixed record at it! For most of the rest of the month I went coughing and spluttering into voluntary self-isolation – and that is boring.
- Saturday, 9th October, was a tough day. I had two selection meetings; one successful and the other not. The first was in the new 2 member ward of Falconbrook, where my colleagues Kate Stock and Simon Hogg were triumphant. Congratulations to them and all the best for the real election next May. The second selection meeting that day was in the new Battersea Park ward, where I was successful along with my new colleagues Juliana Anaan and Maurice McLeod. I look forward to working, and hopefully winning, with them next May.
- Wandsworth’s Council Meeting was held on the 13th Sadly and inevitably, Covid 19 has put everything, including Council Meetings, into the shade. The pandemic, not to mention the climate crisis, has eclipsed the relatively minor issues of running the Council. However, it does remain important that we have a lively political forum, in which to debate how we run our society, when hopefully we can put Covid behind us. Meanwhile the Council Meeting was rather second tier!
- On 14th October, I went to my cousin’s funeral
in Braintree, Essex. He and I were never very close, but immediately post-war, because he lived in Southend-on-Sea, my parents would send me off for a couple of weeks in the summer holidays from Tottenham to live with him, and my aunt and uncle. Penny and I made the 150 mile round journey (and stayed the night) to mark a family passing. It was good to see old family members again after so long. The “butter wouldn’t melt” picture is of David and me. David is the older of the two of us and the picture dates, I guess, from August, 1948. - After the funeral on the next day, 15th October, Pen and I drove the short distance to Colchester, where amongst other things I got a penalty notice for driving into a bus-lane I frankly didn’t see – oh, well, the price of urban living! Why go to Colchester? To visit an old colleague and friend, Guy Wilson, who was elected as a Wandsworth councillor in 1968. The three of us were part of the 1971-78 Labour Council. We had a conversational ramble through the successes and disasters of that Council – and my word there were some great successes and one very large disaster, the implementation, or not, of the 1971 Housing Finance Act!
The picture is of the three of us, Guy on the left, then Penny, and me, along with Margaret Morgan and Martin Linton, celebrating our 1971 victory at a recent 50 year celebration!
- On reflection, the funeral, especially the wake, was a super-spreader event. I haven’t heard of any consequential Covid 19, but I have had a nasty cough ever since and so on 16th October I put myself in self-isolation, despite a negative test – and self-isolation is very boring!
- Self-isolation meant that I did not attend the October Planning Applications Committee, except in Zoom-mode. Although there was nothing very exciting on the agenda, I was impressed by the high quality of councillor involvement and contribution. It was mundane. It was ordinary. It was not going to save the world from environmental disaster; but it was part of the bread-and-butter of local government and it was very well done with thought and care.
- On a quite different matter, one old friend of mine, who makes her living from graphic design, tells me that she likes my newsletters but hates the cross-page justification I have used in the first 3 paragraphs of this newsletter. She thinks it looks much better simply left-justified as in the last 5 paragraphs. Tell me, what is your view? What is the readers’ opinion?
My Programme for November
- On the 4th November, I was going to be at the Civic Awards ceremony at the Town Hall with my colleague Juliana Annan – but I am afraid self-isolation continues to rule that out.
- On the 7th November, Battersea Labour Party is having a Jazz Night at Clapham’s Bread and Roses That is usually an enjoyable occasion and I hope to be there!
- Some of you may remember that Penny was elected for a four-year term as President of the International Association for Eighteenth–Century Studies and we had plans for attending multiple international conferences. Of course, Covid has put a stop to all that. But now Denmark has taken the plunge and so from 10th-14th November we hope to be in Copenhagen – our first trip (holiday, well working holiday for her) in two years. No doubt many of you have not had a break either, so you will know how exciting that feels!
- The November Planning Applications Committee is on 23rd There will probably be a contentious planning application to convert the Clapham Common Bowling Green to a Pitch and Putt course, amongst other items – watch this space!
- Battersea Park Rotary Club invited me give a talk about my 50 years as a councillor and, no doubt, about what has or has not changed during that time. I get lunch in return on 25th I look forward to that but must think just a bit about what really has changed?
Did you Know?
Last month I asked, “Which ward will be abolished next May and, take with it, the proud record of being the only ward in Wandsworth never, ever to have been anything other than represented by Labour councillors?”
That was so easy/boring/inconsequential (delete to taste) that none of you bothered to tell me that it is, of course, Latchmere, the only ward permanently represented by Labour!
And for this month’s puzzler:
I thought I knew my local horse troughs but last month I noticed this one, for the first time, despite passing it a 1,000 times. It is a slight cheat as it is very marginally outside Battersea’s boundaries. Do you know it? And can you point me to a similar trough that is very definitely in Battersea?
If it helps, Yes – they are pub seats in the background.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea October 2021, Newsletter (# 148)
- What a month! Two funerals, a death, a wedding and a “50 years as a councillor party” in the first fortnight; Council candidate selections amid confusion during the whole month; petrol queues and empty supermarket shelves at the end of the month; a new undergound station (or two) for all of us; a new baby for fellow Councillor Kate Stock; and entombment in a Sporle Court lift for me – and those are just the headlines! Oh, and a pro football games.
- 3rd September was the day of Kathy Tracey’s funeral. Kathy was a strong Tory councillor and therefore wicked – but actually not on every issue.
She of course supported, what to me, were some fairly outrageous Tory policies, but, as boss of Wandsworth’s Children’s Services, she genuinely cared for “children looked after” (or “taken into care” in lay language). She was a passionate supporter of girls’ education and of sex education – perhaps particularly for boys! I well remember an epic battle she fought with some hard-right young Tory councillors on that particular issue. I suspect that she might well have become the Leader of the Council, if she had been a man. Here she is after the refurbishment of the Doddington Activity Centre. I certainly respected her.
- On 4th September, fellow councillor Annamarie Crichard invited me to join her and her husband, Steve, at Wimbledon AFC’s new Plough Lane stadium for the league match against Oxford United. I had been to the old Plough Lane stadium,
with my parents, in the 80s – but what a difference. The new ground is very neat and well organised and there is clearly space for the expansion required if the club were to be promoted (unlikely this year but they were in the Premiership equivalent forty years ago). One startling difference between new and old was the playing surface. It was like playing on a carpet as opposed to the mud that used to pass for a football pitch in the 80s. As for the game itsrlf, Oxford United started well and took a 1-0 lead into the second half. But then the Dons came good and ran out 3-1 victors.
- The 9th September was the day picked for the
Celebration of my 50 Years as a Wandsworth councillor. It seemed to go well; and I am delighted to record again my thanks to all who put so much effort into its organisation. And to those of my fellow councillors who funded the event (no Council-paid-for junketing here!). I greatly appreciated the engraved beer tankard presented to https://www.msn.com/en-gb/feed me by the Mayor and which I am holding close to my heart in this picture. -
- And then on 10th September I attended the Quaker funeral of an old friend, Ron Elam. Ron and I were “flat neighbours” in the 1960s and worked together in County Hall from then until the abolition of the Greater London Council in 1986. Away from County Hall, he became a very senior and experienced school governor, travelling the country inspecting and monitoring school governing bodies. Although a Labour Party member, he was frequently used by Tory Wandsworth Council to help and advise on the recovery of failing schools. The Quaker funeral service was very moving, very restrained and very comforting. In general, I’m not one for religious occasions and find some positively off-putting but I must say that the Quakers are in a different class! Plain speaking from the heart is hard to beat.
- To complete the week, on the Saturday, Penny and I were off to the delightful village of Aynho in Northamptonshire for the wedding of one of my colleagues from University – Yes, you read that properly – one of my colleagues from college in the 60s. Mind you it was his third wedding and a very cheerful, happy day it was – lots of dancing, including by me!
- The following day, Penny and I explored the village.
It didn’t take long. It’s not very big but it is spectacular, with a magnificent seventeenth-century mansion (Aynho House), which is used for wedding parties, but not by our party. The most spectacular of the village sites is St. Michael’s Church. It was originally fourteenth-century, but it was destroyed by fire in 1723, except for the tower. Amazingly enough the church was rebuilt in the mid eighteenth-century to look like a country house of the period, but with the church tower standing rather incongruously at one end of it.
- It really was a turbulent fortnight.
- The Planning Applications Committee (PAC) on 16th September included one fascinating decision regarding yet another massive application in Nine Elms. To be honest, I didn’t quite understand it as we were asked both to defer making a decision and to delegate it to the officers. That procedure was very strange and I don’t recall a similar case in all my years’ experience. After all, if there was no urgency, which a decision to defer seemed to imply, then logically there would be enough time to come back to the Committee for due consideration and therefore no need to delegate. It looked frankly odd to me and to most of my Labour colleagues, but the resolution was passed by the Tory majority. I will certainly keep my eyes open to see what follows from their decision!
- One of the biggest events in Battersea
in 2021 has to be the opening of the Battersea Park underground station. I didn’t go to the actual opening but I did travel from the station to the new Nine Elms station just a few days later. What is so noticeable is how clean, fresh and empty the station and the platforms are. It is a timid commuter’s delight but the impact on TfL’s finances is too dreadful to contemplate. Of course, the line needs to continue to Clapham
Junction. That would transform the pattern of usage but the money just isn’t there (without government intervention), despite what some critics are claiming. As a result it does run the risk of becoming a massively under-used facility. One fascinating indicator of this is the lack of business at mid-day in the massive Sainsbury’s lower car park at Nine Elms and its usea as a training ground for these young in-line skaters!
- If you are not interested in the minutiae of politics, you should skip this paragraph because much of the rest of September was taken up by Labour councillors and newcomers competing to be the party’s candidates in next May’s Borough election. The process has been delayed by Covid, and complicated by the ward and boundary changes. So, to take an obvious and personal example, the old Latchmere ward will cease to exist in May 2022 and its three councillors, Simon Hogg, Kate Stock and myself, are competing with two newcomers for the two Falconbrook councillor positions. By definition we cannot all win. It’s a tense time in Battersea Park, Falconbrook and Shaftesbury & Queenstown wards but we will know our candidates by 10th October.
- Meanwhile, life continues! On 19th September,
fellow Latchmere Councillor Kate Stock gave birth to a 10 lb 4 oz baby boy, named Jude. Congratulations to Kate and her husband, Tom. Kate doesn’t, by the way, believe in half measures. As well as coping with Jude, and his young sister Edie, and with ward reselections, she and Tom moved house on 30th September and became very near neighbours of ours.
- On September 23rd Kambala Cares, one of the two main volunteer groups helping to cook, shop and care for the vulnerable during the Covid lockdown, organised a party for its volunteers. I went as did Cllr Hogg and, most significantly, Mayor Richard Field. The party organised by Chair Donna Barham was well deserved by the many volunteers and very enjoyable for all.
- As a councillor, I make regular tours of
Latchmere. On September 25th, I visited a constituent in Sporle Court (pictured here), the old high-rise, giant of north Battersea before all these new higher developments. As it happened, my constituent lived on the 19th I was alone in the lift, thank goodness, because as it started there was a great clunk, which worried me rather. The lift continued but, when it stopped, just inches short of the 19th floor platform, the door would not open! Have you ever been trapped in a lift, regardless of which floor it was on? An interesting experience! It was a warm day, so the first thing I did was take off my vest. It was getting hot in there. A few years back I had a bad attack of claustrophobia when in a long dark tunnel. It is essential to keep calm. So, it wasn’t great to be told by Penny, when I rang through to her, “Don’t panic!” She sounded like a government minister on speed!
- Actually the alarm system worked as it should and, after about 40 minutes, a team of 5 fire-fighters arrived and prised the doors open. Phew! I now have first hand experience of what many of our residents fear on a daily basis; and, whilst incidents like mine are not that frequent, minor lift malfunctions are. Is this the result of poor maintenance? Or a function of age and/or cheap original products. By the way I did visit my constituent!
- Talking about not panicking, What do you think about the Government’s performance during the petrol crisis, during the food delivery crisis, during the never-ending Covid crisis? Perhaps there is no need to panic about petrol, food or Covid but there certainly seems to be good reason to panic about our government and its competence levels!
My Programme for October
- Well, of course, Labour councillors in Battersea are pre-occupied with the tense, process of selecting candidates for the council election in May 2022. Thankfully the decision day is not now far off and then normal life can resume!
- In terms of regular, scheduled meetings I have the full Council on 12th October, and the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) on the 19th.
Did you Know?
Last month I asked, “where I was in Latchmere ward
when I took this picture of more than 100 solar panels?”
Plenty of you had an answer to this and many were nearly, but not quite, correct – such as the response that I was on the train pulling into Wandsworth Town station. The actual answer was on the 10th floor of Oxborough House, which is the tallest of the new blocks on the “newish” development in Eltringham Street.
And this month a different teaser:
Which ward will be abolished next May and take with it the proud record of being the only ward in Wandsworth never, ever to have been anything other than represented by Labour councillors? And don’t say that is a difficult question!
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea September 2021, Newsletter (# 147)
- I realise that, more than once, I have started my newsletter with the less-than-startling comment that the previous month had been quiet but, in this case, August really was a quiet month – as you perhaps would expect. But I did have a meeting on Friday, the thirteenth (not that I am superstitious), with the current developers, Balance Out Living, of the site on the corner of Culvert and Battersea Park Roads – the one surrounded by a blue hoarding, which forces pedestrians onto the road. I say the “current” developers, as the previous ones disappeared at some point after getting planning permission. Don’t ask me whether they were Covid-burnt or market-roasted but, one way or another, they have gone.
- The new developers plan to build a “community living” space. Interestingly it will be the third planning application for such a development in Wandsworth, that I can recall over the last few years. Work on the other two, one near Earlsfield Station and the other in Chatfield Road, just off York Road, is quite advanced. The concept is to build blocks of living spaces, supported by a host of communal activities, such as workspaces, film and TV rooms, kitchens, and a cafe/restaurant. The end result would be like the best student apartment blocks but in a more luxurious style than that usually associated with students. The age range of the projected residents is wider than you might imagine (based on a couple of similar developments built in West London 10 years ago) though, of course, this kind of block is not very suitable for either families or the elderly.
- A consultation leaflet was distributed to the immediate neighbourhood in the last week of August describing the proposed development.
Here is a CGI (Computer Generated Image) of the original and this one is not very different. It is going as high as 13 storeys, which, in my opinion, is still far too high for this site; but, as the previous permission is still valid, there is nothing we can do about that. There is though the hope of work starting on the site soon and a promise that the school’s sports hall will be built as soon as permission is granted, which could be in October or November. So it is broadly good news for the school, its pupils and the residents of Dagnall Street, who have had to put up with a building site for far too many months, even if the development is still in my view too high and too large for this site.
- On the 19th August, I had the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) Only three of the applications were for sites in Battersea and two were of only very, very local interest, but the picture shows the third, a new 8 storey building, on Battersea Bridge Road, opposite the Union pub.
It includes 24 residential units, of which 9 are, so-called, affordable units, above some offices and most interestingly a community/church hall on the ground floor. The development is part of a controversial re-generation of the Surrey Lane estate. By the way, on this occasion only 54 members of the public watched the PAC online but, interestingly, another 80 viewers tuned in later to the podcast, no doubt to catch up on what happened to applications of relevance to them. Interestingly enough, one of the local Tory councillors, and the Battersea Society, objected to the height of the building and thought it out-of-character. Is this an indicator of the “Tory worm turning” against Battersea’s incessant upward development?
- Unfortunately the Committee was held on the same evening as the Battersea Society’s summer party at St. Mary’s church. I was sad to miss that party, as it is one of the nicest social events of the summer. My regret was compounded by the rain which forced Battersea Labour Party to abandon its Battersea Park picnic on 21st August and re-locate it in the pub, the Magic Garden – pleasant enough but not the same as a picnic, nor as Covid secure!
- On one of my ward walkabouts, I came across the 3 security men guarding the Battersea Methodist Chapel. At some time in August, some protestors occupied the chapel building with the intention, they claimed, to take it and turn it into a community resource. They had thought that they were occupying a “council property” and were quick enough to repent and leave when they discovered it was still a church property. Good for them BUT isn’t it worrying that they clearly did not think that council ownership was, in any sense, good for the community? The trust between publicly elected bodies and the public, so strong when I was a kid in the immediate post-war years, is today dangerously torn asunder.
- I also came across this development site, which is
the start of the Council’s building work on the new Northcote Library, right across the road from the current one. (For those who know it well, it is the site of the old Chatham Hall, scene in the past of jumble sales, political meetings, tenants associations and more recently of a day nursery). The old, much liked but totally inaccessible library building (you try it with a wheel-chair!) is likely to be replaced in 2023/24 by shop-fronts and housing in a style no doubt appropriate for Northcote Road.
- On 30th/31st August Penny and I visited family in Winchester……very pleasant, lousy weather, nothing special.
My Programme for September
- September (and maybe October) will be occupied with the very intense, nervous process of selecting candidates for the council election in May 2022. The process is the first step towards the Council Election and is in some ways the biggest hurdle to overcome. If you get selected in a “safe Labour” ward, then you are halfway to being elected as a councillor in May. The same is, of course, also true for Tory candidates in “safe Tory” wards. But the problem is that, after the ward boundary changes and redistribution, no one quite knows which wards are safe. So, if your local councillors are a bit snappy and nervous, then forgive them – they are probably having a trying time in selection meetings!
- In terms of regular, scheduled meetings I have the Conservation Advisory Committee on 2nd September, the Crematorium Board on 7th and the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) on the 16th.
- Meanwhile, on the 12th September, we are going to the wedding party of an old college friend, who got married a year ago and has planned about three other Covid postponed parties. Tony (yes, another Tony) has given up waiting on an official end to Covid and has decided to go with the flow. The party is in the lovely little Northamptonshire town of Aynho.
- The following week is the week of the Labour Party Conference, which of course is followed immediately afterwards by the Tory Conference – something tells me that there are going to be some hard battles during that fortnight!
Did you Know?
Last month I asked, “Which Olympians from this year’s Tokyo Olympiad either live in Battersea or were said on TV to have had family watching the event on TV in Battersea?” Quite clearly none of you were interested in that question as not one of you even attempted an answer. All I can say, is that one athlete, a member of the equestrian team and a silver medallist, name of Tom McEwen, was said by the TV commentator to have parents watching at home in Battersea.
And for this month can you tell me
where I was in Latchmere ward when I took this picture of more than 100 solar panels?
PS. In the summer I gave an hour’s zoom talk to the Battersea Society, called Battersea, 1801-2021, the history of this London suburb. It went quite well – I am told, so I just wondered whether any readers would be interested in hearing a repeat. Let me know at tonybelton99@gmail.com and I will timetable a repeat zoom session.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea August 2021, Newsletter (# 146)
- 1st July. I was on tenterhooks that evening as Kim Leadbeater won the Batley and Spen by-election for Labour by 323 votes. You will remember that this was the seat where the Labour MP, Jo Cox, was assassinated by a right-wing fanatic in 2016, and her successor resigned this year, when she became the Mayor of West Yorkshire. Labour had lost the Hartlepool by-election as recently as 6th May. Things did not look good for Labour or for Keir Starmer, but, in fact, Labour, in the person of Kim, just held on and suddenly the glitter had gone from the government. Johnson is beginning to get the bad press he so clearly deserves, with his own MPs getting uncomfortable about his failure to deliver. Unfortunately, there is as yet no sign of the public returning to Labour in any great numbers, but at least the Tory Party rocket looks to have burnt out.
- 6th July. I took
Battersea’s Labour M.P., Marsha de Cordova, to the Centre Court, Wimbledon, where we saw Angelique Kerber comfortably beat Karolina Muchova, 6-2, 6-3. But the day was not vintage Wimbledon. There were showers preventing us from walking the show; Marsha had had very short notice of a Shadow Cabinet meeting called for early the next day and was clearly concerned about that, whilst I was also pre-occupied. Meanwhile, the match was not great, with Kerber (pictured here) dominating from first to last.
It is sometimes amusing, when walking round Battersea streets, to see just how people decorate their gardens or, in this case, their corridors. But I have never seen the internal corridor of a “Council block” with statuary quite like these ladies on the right! I loved them.
- 12th July. I introduced our MP, Marsha de Cordova, to Battersea United Charities (BUC) – well virtually – in a Covid-approved sort of way. Both Marsha and BUC seemed pleased with the meeting, although both the trustees and Marsha would clearly have preferred a real face-to-face meeting. The BUC told Marsha of the kind and type of charitable grant they make (i.e. educational grants within the ancient parish of Battersea) and she, in her turn, suggested that they might wish to use her to publicise some of their projects, in order to increase the number of applicants.
- 19th July had been set up by the Prime Minister as Freedom Day. What an absurd notion! Freedom from what? Clearly not from Covid-19 as it is obviously fighting fit and ready to fight another day; freedom from regulations that are designed to keep us alive? So that we can be free to be infected? Or free from fear? Tell that to someone who is immuno-compromised. Freedom from caring for the sick and dying? Tell that to nursing staff; tell it to doctors. One thing, that we definitely are not free from, is the absurd statements coming from this most irresponsible of all governments.
- On 21st July I had a Wandsworth Council Meeting. It was a curious occasion. The Government had, earlier in the month, ruled that we councillors could no longer have hybrid meetings – that is, meetings held with both online and actual presence of councillors. However, there are several councillors with health issues, which prevented them from being there in person. Moreover, because of social distancing rules, we were, to some degree, discouraged from attendance, because the Council Chamber, large as it is, is not really large enough to allow adequate social distancing. All these factors made me decide to stay away, making this one of the very, very few Council Meetings that I have missed since May 1971.
- Watching the meeting online, I just did not think that the Council Meeting worked in procedural terms. I am not kidding myself into thinking that many of the public would want to watch such an event. It turns out that there was an audience of 75, but that total included half-a-dozen absent councillors, like me. In fact unless one knew the arcane processes of the Council, the procedures must have been indecipherable. I, for one, let alone the other 74, hardly knew what was going on!
- The Planning Applications Committee, on 27th July, featured an application for a two-form entry primary school in Nine Elms, just west of the American embassy. It was a Council application made on the basis of estimates of the future child population in Nine Elms. It is an inherently risky business, building a new school for an estimated future, as yet not born, child population: the Council will be criticised if there are too few 5-11 year-olds but, of course, it would have been crucified if, having granted permissions for the large developments in Nine Elms, it had not provided enough school places. The application was agreed unanimously. The other applications were of only local interest, though of course important to the applicants.
- On the 28th July, Penny and I set off for a three day trip to Alnwick,
Northumberland, where we stayed with some old friends. We had, however, never visited their house before – here it is, an early nineteenth-century house close to the centre of town with a view of the castle. We had a great time and their garden boasts having its very own hedgehog, which we did see one night. It was the first hedgehog that either of us had seen since at least the 1960s. I imagine that there may be hedgehogs somewhere in Battersea Park, but can anyone confirm a sighting in Battersea?
- On our first day there, we went for a walk from
the tiny port of Craster to Dustanburgh Castle. On the way back we were spotted by Battersea residents and fellow Labour Party members, Ed and Aviva with their son Henry – small world! Here they are with Penny, about a mile from the castle, which is clear on the horizon.
- Alnwick itself is a small market town with its own castle. But castles are, as they say, ten a penny, on this coast
with Bamburgh Castle, seen here, one of the most impressive. They are not display castles nor nineteenth-century follies; they are nearly all twelth- or thirteenth-century fortifications; and many played key roles in either defence against the Scots or the century of battles, culminating in the so-called Wars of the Roses, which basically settled the English (and I mean English not British) monarchy on the Tudors.
My Programme for August
- In terms of formal Council Committees or Council Meetings, there is only the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) on the 19th August.
- But I do have occasional management meetings about planning and housing issues and, of course, the regular flow of casework, helping constituents.
Did you Know?
Last month I asked, “Where in Battersea was the location of a pioneering aircraft factory, named Omnia Works, where WW1 fighter aircraft were made? And where, again in Battersea, did its owner and managing director live?”
There is a blue plaque commemorating Hilda Hewlett, the first woman licenced as a pilot, on the building at 4 Vardens Road, off St. John’s Hill. Vardens Road was the site of her Omnia Works, where aircraft, including WW1 fighter aircraft were made in 1912-14. Hilda herself lived at 34 Park Mansions, Prince of Wales Drive. Well done, Spen and others.
And for this month can you tell me:
Which Olympians from this year’s Tokyo Olympiad either live in Battersea or were said on TV to have had family watching the event on TV in Battersea? Clearly, I don’t have a definitive answer but can we collaboratively put together a list of, say, 3 which would be roughly three times Battersea’s proportion of the British population?
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea July 2021, Newsletter (# 145)
That was June, June that was
- 1 June. I was walking along Trinity Road, in Wandsworth Common, when I saw this magnificent hearse. Obviously, it marks a sad event for someone, somewhere, but it also provides a spectacle and an insight into cultural diversity, between the sombre nature of some funerals and the joyous celebration of a departed life “enjoyed” by others. (please note this version of the blog is without pictures – techie problem! I hope to sort shortly)
- 5-6 June. Penny and I went Eastbourne for the weekend. On the Saturday we went to Pevensey Castle, five miles from Eastbourne, where William the Conqueror landed at the start of his conquest of England. The magnificent ruins of the Castle command a splendid view over the coastal plain/marshes and of the sea, which has retreated a couple of miles since 1066. This photograph of the Norman castle ruins is not the best – of the castle – but I chose it for one very special feature and that is the gun emplacement set in the Norman Tower during the Second World War – an eleventh-century pillarbox defence. So, from some fortifications at Pevensey in Roman times through to its military use in the twentieth century, it has had an active history of 16 centuries – a truly unique British castle.
- On the Sunday, we went on the “Annual Family Walk” from the Birling Gap to the top of Beachy Head. I was a little doubtful about whether I could make it all the way, but managed OK. The trouble was that, whilst the rest of the country was basking under a beautiful sun, we were trapped in a sea fog and couldn’t see the sea, the Beachy Head light-house or almost anything else. And the day had started with this beautiful and tranquil, if unspectacular, dawn at about 3.45 am!
- 7 June. I went to a lecture organised by Labour Heritage and given by Baroness Dianne Hayter. She was talking about a book that she had written in 2006 on the centenary of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) and about the 29 MPs, who in 1906 got together to form the PLP and, effectively, the Labour Party. The book, called Men Who Made Labour, is a record of the lives of these 29 men and their experiences as the first Labour MPs. Nearly all were what we might call “working men”, with very few having had any formal education beyond the age of 12 or 13. Almost none had ever been to London before their election and none had had any exposure to life in Parliament. The challenges they faced were immense compared to most modern-day experiences. But nevertheless, through self-education, hard-work and endless commitment they became over time Cabinet Ministers and, in at least one case, Prime Minister. Dianne, an old friend, told the story with passion and understanding – it was an hour’s Zoom well spent.
- 10 June. This time, I was doing the talking – to Croydon Trades Council. Croydon Borough Council recently decided to hold a referendum on 7th October this year, when the voters will be asked whether they want to have an elected Mayor or to keep the current Leader and councillors model. As it happens, one of the Trades Council members recalled reading an article I had written in 2007, on why elected mayors are “bad news”. Hence I was invited to speak. My speech went well but I think most of the audience was on my side before they had even heard a word. Nevertheless, it was good to get a good reception. If you are interested in my arguments against elected Mayors, then you can see the article on my blog at tonybelton.wordpress.com/
- Constituency Boundaries. Boundaries are extremely important to people deeply involved in politics. It may seem very boring to most but it is a matter of life and death to real politicos. It is because they have manipulated electoral boundaries so efficiently that the Republican Party is stronger in the US House of Representatives than its poll numbers would suggest. Indeed the word “gerrymandering” is an American word of abuse, originally aimed at the Democratic Governor of Massachusetts called Elbridge Gerry and the boundaries he drew up in 1812 for a new voting district, shaped, it is said, like a salamander or as the Boston Weekly Messenger called it a “Gerry-Mander”.
- This comment is a long-way round to introducing the fact that the Boundary Commissioners have recently produced their latest proposals for parliamentary boundaries. The whole point of these proposals is, of course, to try and bring some kind of democratic equality to bear on the electoral process by making parliamentary constituencies of more or less of equal population size – the law actually allows a 5% variation. Unfortunately, geography is nowhere as neat as arithmetic, and so five constituencies are defined by geography and not by population numbers. They are the islands of Orkney and Shetland, the Hebrides, Anglesey and two on the Isle of Wight.
- Fortunately on this occasion, the growth in Battersea’s (and the Borough’s) population more or less reflects the growth in the country’s population, hence no gerrymandering is required. The three Wandsworth constituencies of Battersea, Putney and Tooting, as proposed, are almost unchanged. But Tory Party MPs may be less keen than they were to implement the boundary redistribution, because, since the 2019 General Election, they do not stand to gain as much as they had previously expected – or at least that is what I have heard Labour cynics say! And, if that is the case, then maybe – as so often before – nothing will happen. We really ought to take these crucial decisions out of the hands of active politicians, and into the hands of the independent Electoral Commission.
- 22 June. I had a meeting in the morning of the North East Surrey Crematorium Board – and after its routine business, I was shown the grave of John Archer, famously the first black Mayor of a major local authority when elected Mayor of Battersea in 1913. I must confess that the grave itself is fairly unremarkable but it has its place in Battersea history, even if the graveyard is located deep in Merton! Or even Sutton?
- On the way back home from the Crem Board, I passed an unusual scene in Christchurch parsonage garden. Not exactly where I expected to see a rehearsal of Oscar Wilde’s The Importance of Being Ernest but that is what it was – and I never found out when and where it was produced but it made for an entertaining surprise for anyone walking along Candahar Road, just off Battersea Park Road!
- That same evening there was a meeting of the Planning Applications Committee and, as regular readers will know, there is usually something of interest on the agenda. But on this occasion – nothing. So, I pass on to the Education Committee, which had two items that sparked an interest. The first was a Report on Wandsworth Independent and State School Partnership. Now, with one of the largest private-sector engagements in public education in the country, one would think that this issue has to be of major significance to Wandsworth local education authority. But with the final recommendations saying “This paper sets out the plans to strengthen the relationships between Independent and State schools in Wandsworth with a view to establish a long term mutually beneficial cross-sector partnership adding value to both sectors and securing targeted support for disadvantaged pupils in the borough…There is no additional financial implication for Council” – the heart sinks.
- The second item that caught my eye was the Report by the Director of Childrens Services on Wandsworth catch up strategy – that is, to catch up on education following all the disruption caused by the Covid Pandemic. How exciting and demanding one thinks, until reading the recommendations which say, and I quote, “No decisions are required on it by the Council”. That was Council politics in June, that was!
My Programme for July
-
- On July 1st we have the result of the Batley and Spen by-election – of course Labour won but more about that next month!
- I am taking Battersea’s MP, Marsha de Cordova, to Wimbledon on 6th July, which will be fun.
- On July 12th I have a meeting of Battersea United Charities, where Marsha will be a guest.
- On 15th July both Kambala Cares and the Battersea Society are having their summer parties.
- A meeting of the Special Neighbourhood Team is due to be held on 20th.
- There is a Council Meeting on 21st July.
- On the 23rd July the Falcon Estate Residents Association Committee is having an annual dinner.
- The Planning Applications Committee (PAC) is on the 27th July.
Did you Know: Last month I asked, “How many pubs are there in Latchmere ward? Their names? And how many have closed to your knowledge in the recent past and their names?”
Not one of you tried a reply, and I don’t know the answer but let us work it out, working from west to east. There is the Anchor in Hope Street, the Asparagus and the Suburb in Falcon Road, the Latchmere and the Clockhouse in Battersea Park Road and the Flag in Culvert Road, and that is that – I think. Closed: in the recent past: the Grove, the Duke of Wellington, the Meyrick Arms, the Prince’s Head, the London, Dover and Chatham Railway Tavern, pictured right, and the Havelock Arms. So, 6 down and 6 remaining; pubs really are an endangered species in our current environment!
And for this month can you tell me:
Where in Battersea was the location of a pioneering aircraft factory, named Omnia Works, where WW1 fighter aircraft were made? And where, again in Battersea, did its owner and managing director live?
For or against an elected Mayor, 2008
In February, 2008, I wrote the following article, largely because of the criticism of the then Mayor Ken Livingstone. Thirteen years later, having experienced the “achievements” of both Mayor Boris Johnson and Mayor Sadiq Khan, I am inclined to think my comments then are just as relevant today. In the intervening period Hartlepool (2013), Stoke-on-Trent (2009) and Torbay (2019) Councils have voted the Mayoral system out. Only Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, gives me cause to wonder whether there can be exceptions.
The Despatches programme of 21st January 2008 and subsequent debate poses a simple question, “Is it Ken Livingstone or the role of the London Mayor that is at fault?”
The programme gave plenty of ammunition to those, who might think that Livingstone is the problem. It raises issues about cronyism at City Hall, about dubious grant decisions, about the Greater London Authority members’ ability to scrutinise Mayor Livingstone’s actions and about Ken Livingstone’s personality.
Livingstone’s reply in the February 4th New Statesman is, however, robust and convincing. Moreover, Livingstone was positive in his defence of the Mayoral role in a recent Today interview. He declared that he had originally opposed the role as proposed by Tony Blair and doubted that it was appropriate for London, or indeed anywhere else in Britain. But he claims to have been converted and to doubt that he, or anyone else, could have introduced anything as radical as the Congestion Charge under the traditional committee structure of British local government.
Leaving to one side whether the Congestion Charge is or is not a sufficient justification for the role as defined, it is surely time to analyse the success or failure of the Mayoral role and the demands it places on individuals. Has Tony Blair’s radical, even revolutionary, change to the British local government system been a vindication of his confident assertion “that we are at our best when we are at our boldest” or has it demonstrated instead the dangers of unconsidered innovation?
The Greater London Act of 1999 established the role and function of the Mayor and the Greater London Authority (GLA) following the overwhelming Referendum result of 1998. In the Referendum, the London public had decided by a 78:22 majority that it wanted to reverse Mrs. Thatcher’s abolition of the Greater London Council. Even Conservative-dominated Bromley voted 57:43 in favour of the reform and in every other Borough the result was more emphatic.
The Act establishing the GLA also became a model for other local government reforms passed by the New Labour Government, especially the Local Government Act of 2000, which was the legislative basis for establishing the Executive Mayors and Cabinets that are now part of English local government. Ken Livingstone was elected Mayor of London in 2000 and two years later in May, 2002, Doncaster, Hartlepool, Watford, Lewisham, Newham, North Tyneside and Middlesborough elected Executive Mayors. They were followed by elections for Mayors in Stoke, Mansfield, Hackney and Bedford in October, 2002, and in Torbay in May, 2005.
But the turnout for the London Referendum was a meagre 34%, whilst for the Mayor and GLA it was an even more anaemic 31%. The equivalent referenda in the Boroughs and cities had a wide range of turnouts. In areas where the Mayoral system was rejected the range was between 9% and 64%. At the Mayoral elections turnouts ranged from 15% to 36%, with 18% at Mansfield and 26% in Hackney, though Mansfield’s turnout rose to 34% in May, 2007.
What had happened to inspire this sudden change in England’s traditional local governance arrangements? And indeed was it such a change? Certainly two of the objectives were clear. It was claimed that electoral turnout needed to be improved and “democratic accountability” needed to be strengthened. The inspiration came from two major sources: one political and the other academia and the media world. English local government had traditionally and universally been considered boring, worthy and probably more efficient and less corrupt than most of its equivalents in the developed world. It was probably most graphically displayed in the opening scenes of the iconic Room at the Top (pub. 1957), which sent a clear message of just how boring and square a job in local government really was. Indeed, it continued to be galling, as a councillor, to read newspaper articles starting with phrases like, “I shall start with the two most boring words in the English language – local government” (Guardian, some time in the 90s).
This began to change when in the 60s Governments of both persuasions used local authorities to achieve national housing targets. In the 70s a new, self-confident graduate generation of mainly London councillors challenged the government’s “right” to lay down not just the framework but many more of the rules of local government. By the 80s, for the first time in post-war history, local government was far from boring. On the left there was Lambeth and Liverpool, but also Islington and Ken Livingstone’s Greater London Council (GLC), challenging the Thatcher government politically and ideologically. On the right Bradford, Westminster and Wandsworth were privatising services and along with Croydon urging the abolition of the GLC, the ILEA and the metropolitan counties.
The Labour Councils, including those caricaturised as the “loony left” Councils, of the 80s were not only battle-grounds for such groups as Militant and their fellow travellers but also a nursery for many aspiring young politicians, who were to get into Parliament on 1st May 1997. At least half a dozen MPs post-1997 had been Leaders of London Labour Groups and many more came from similar positions across the country. Most of them had had a difficult time controlling, or not, their Labour councillor colleagues and were all too ready to go along with a Government scarred by the experience of the 80s and eager to ensure that its own reputation would not be destroyed by irresponsible or naïve local representatives.
The academic world was providing an answer, which fitted very neatly with both their personal experiences and the inclinations of Tony Blair. A key player in this was Professor Gerry Stoker. Stoker was the founding Chair of the New Local Government Network (NLGN), a contributor to influential Labour think tanks like Demos and an author of many books and articles on local governance.
2
Another was Paul Corrigan, husband of Hilary Armstrong, Blair’s first Minister of State at the Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions with responsibility for Local Government. Along with Simon Jenkins, the journalist, they popularised a view that local government was insufficiently accountable and/or interesting and as a consequence it was a prey both to the extremist left and the nimby right.
In an interesting, if later, work (New Localism, Participation and Networked Community Governance, Univ. of Manchester) Stoker etched a sociological history of local government, in which he argued that local government had transmuted from the “traditional public administration” model, the Room at the Top model, through the “New Public Management” model, his description of the minimalist Nicholas Ridley model, to today’s “Networked Local Governance”.
In the first of these models the agreed objectives of local government were simple, even if large and technically complex. The objectives were about providing housing, drainage, roads and schools. The leadership of such authorities could be left to large, mass political parties, whose basic stance was generally understood.
In the second model, where ideally local authorities would meet once a year and award service contracts to service providers, the goal was again simple – the most efficient delivery of services at the lowest cost. Unsurprisingly under Mrs. Thatcher’s administration, Conservative-controlled Councils such as Bradford and Wandsworth were in the vanguard. In this model governance was hardly an issue. Ridley thought that ideally a Council Election would take place annually, or four-yearly depending upon location; the Council would meet and allocate service delivery contracts and then the Leader and Cabinet could simply get on with the job of governing.
The Ridley model had one big advantage over the experience that most Labour councillors (and future MPs) had in the 80s. Because the goals were simple, the model facilitated the rise of powerful and focused Leaders. They may not have had quite the aura of a Livingstone but Dame Shirley Porter of Westminster, Eric Pickles of Bradford and Sir Paul Beresford of Wandsworth had a clear sense of direction and strong united groups behind them.
There was, however, a major disadvantage. What were the other 60 or so councillors on the authority supposed to do? Michael Heseltine came up with his own version of this in the early 90s when, as well as advocating elected executive mayors, he suggested that councillors should concentrate on their casework and become community representatives.
Peculiarly enough this was essentially the same conclusion that New Labour came to under Tony Blair. The process started with the optional introduction of Executive Mayors and Cabinets in 2000 and 2002. In the GLA Act the Blair Government did not quite have the courage to install a Mayor, unconstrained by other members of the authority, but it did the next best thing. A Greater London Authority was created with 25 members performing an overview and scrutiny function.
But from its creation it had less chance of scrutinising the Mayor than any other elected body in the UK, whether Parliament or the humblest local council. Fourteen members were elected to represent mega-constituencies with populations of about 450,000. The other 11 were elected by a form of proportional representation by all Londoners. This structure was designed to ensure that it was impossible for any one party to “win control” and operate as a real check on the Mayor. New Labour reformers had argued, and were to continue to do so, that one fault with local government was that few knew who their councillors were. Ironically, they created the 25 most unknown councillors in history!
That was not, however, the only or even the major weakness with the institution. The ultimate sanction in the British Parliamentary (and Council) system is the potential loss of confidence in the Leader. Less seriously, Parliament and Councils can refuse to vote for policies or pass budgets. The first of these options is not open to GLA members – they can merely scrutinise and comment. The second is almost denied them. Rejection of the Mayor’s budget is only possible with a two thirds majority, which given the 25 members of the GLA means that 17 of the 25 members have to oppose. Quinton Hogg once described British democracy as an ‘elective dictatorship’.
Ironically, New Labour with its emphasis on new localism and democratic participation has managed to create an elected Mayor with all but dictatorial powers. Blair, of course, expected to have a “business-man” Mayor. The last thing he expected was a Mayoral candidate, who knew London, had experience of running it and with the charisma to win. The other Mayors have similar, if slightly less powerful positions. Once given their four year mandate they are secure in their position. In NLGN’s own words, “A mayor is equally responsible to the whole city, borough or council, unlike a council leader who has been directly elected from only one ward amongst many and whose power is derived primarily from an ability to retain the support of other councillors (or, more likely, the dominant political party).”
Accountability “to the whole city, borough or council” may have theoretical advantages but the writer fails to understand that having “ability to retain the support of other councillors (or, more likely, the dominant political party)” is not just a valuable political asset, but a much more immediate and far more effective system of accountability than a once in four years election. It is a crucial “check and balance” in the system.
Recent Government White Papers suggest that the lesson has still not been learnt. For example, it is now suggested that where directly elected Mayors are not introduced then Leaders should be elected by their fellow councillors for four-year terms. There seems to be no recognition of the reality of political life at Council level, which is simply that, if the Leader loses the confidence of the councillors, even if only of “the dominant political party” s/he will last no time at all and if s/he does not lose that confidence then they have no need to be protected by national legislation.
Unfortunately, there appears to be little evidence that other claims for the new governance system have been justified. For example, much of the anguish about the state of local government relates to electoral turnout. But using London Boroughs as an example the evidence from 2006 is not encouraging to the reformers. In Hackney, despite going to the same polling booths on the same day more people actually voted for their councillors than for the Mayor. The Borough-wide turnout was 34.41% and the Mayoral vote just 32.24%. In Newham the turn-out was 34.41%, but in non-Mayoral votes on the same day Bexley managed 42.35%, Greenwich 35.81% and Richmond 51%.
Wandsworth is an interesting example, which suggests a different explanation for differential turnouts. In Wandsworth turnout rose from 34% at its inception in 1964 to 49% in 1978 and then in the following four elections in 1982, 1986, 1990 and 1994 to 54%, 51%, 57% and 51%. However, the 1998, 2002 and 2006 elections have seen turnouts falling again to 40%, 30% and 34%. This exactly mirrors the very tight nature of the political contest in the 80s and the very much less closely fought battles since gentrification took strong hold. In other words, and unsurprisingly, people seem to have a greater tendency to vote when it looks likely to make a difference.
A similar explanation might apply in Hackney. Although the disparity in figures is not very great, surely it is conceivable that the 2.17%, who voted for their councillor in Hackney wards but not for their Mayor, either did not know who the Mayor was or thought it a non-contest with Mayor Pipe certain to be returned to office.
So in practice neither turnout nor accountability has been improved by the introduction of the “Executive” Mayor. Indeed lack of Mayoral accountability is a major platform of the “Bring back democracy” campaign in Lewisham and the move to abolish the Mayor in Doncaster. Indeed on 27th February 2007 Doncaster Council responded to an 11,000 signature petition by voting for an abolition referendum, which is due to take place on 1st May this year.
Interestingly googling “remove mayors” brings up 705,000 results, including Doncaster and Lewisham but also many, many examples of electors trying to remove executive mayors in many of the United States and other places round the globe. The last remaining argument for the Mayoralty, used by Ken Livingstone and his supporters, is the claim that only the new Mayoral power enabled him to introduce the Congestion Charge. The philosophical basis of that argument, “the end justifies the means”, is so shallow as to be unworthy of Livingstone. But it also demeans his previous achievements. As Leader of the Greater London Council, with traditional local government powers, he was capable of introducing the equally radical and challenging Fares Fair policy, which had a similar and possibly greater impact than the Congestion Charge.
None of this is an argument to deny a vote to Ken on 1st May. If you believe, as I do, that Ken’s record has been overwhelmingly positive for London (despite his crazy dalliance with high rise developments!) then voting for him must be the correct move for a Londoner. The Conservative Party’s irresponsibility in putting forward Johnson as an alternative effectively robs the electorate of any real choice.
However, personal power on the scale of the London Mayor’s would be enough to turn the character of a saint. It is, therefore, incumbent upon politicians, of all persuasions, to resist the introduction of any more Executive Mayors, to reform the Greater London Authority’s constitution, to restrain the Mayor’s role and to give real power and influence to its members. Politics is and should be a pluralist process, and emphatically not an elective dictatorship.
(February 2008)
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea June 2021, Newsletter (# 144)
- I am having a season of anniversaries! What with
reaching the dreaded 80 in April, on 13th May I notched up 50 years as a Labour councillor – it must be a drug – or certainly an addiction. The Town Hall put out a press release, which was nice of them. They dredged up a picture of yours truly in 1971. Here it is; as shown in my election leaflet, would you believe? I won Northcote ward that year and subsequently Graveney before settling down in Latchmere in 1982 – but enough of me. - On 2nd May, I went canvassing in Bedford ward, just near Tooting Bec station with the Labour candidate in the Bedford ward by-election, which was held along with the GLA election on 6th May. It was a Labour area and it was an enjoyable occasion – canvassing is always much more fun when you do NOT get doors slammed in your face and have no abuse to deal with (I am not suggesting, by the way, that Tory canvassers don’t get the same treatment in reverse). I was impressed with Labour’s candidate, Hannah Stanislaus. Whatever else she brings to the Council – she has a good, bold, confident doorstep manner.
- On 6th May itself, Labour did well in London in general and in Bedford and Wandsworth in particular. The by-election result was strikingly similar to the Bedford result in the 2018 Borough election. The turn-out at just over 51.4% was very slightly higher this year than the 48% turn-out in the Borough election and the Labour and Tory votes were very similar, with Labour on 50% as opposed to 49% and Tories on 24% as opposed to 23%. Interestingly, the Green candidate gained 50% more votes than in 2018 – admittedly from a far lower base but the Greens must feel that they are on the move.
- On the same day, of course, Sadiq Khan was
re-elected Mayor of London and Leonie Cooper re-elected as the Assembly Member for Merton and Wandsworth. Congratulations to both of them, who I know well having been a fellow Wandsworth councillor for more than a dozen years. They are part of the story that London has become an overwhelmingly Labour city. But I think that both, Sadiq and Leonie, have questions to answer. In Sadiq’s case, his first term has been defined by disaster, with the Grenfell Tower disaster of 2017, being followed by the Covid crisis of 2019-21 (22, 23?). And in this election he had an admittedly small (1.6%) swing against him achieved by someone universally perceived as one of the weakest Mayoral candidates ever, the Tory Shaun Bailey. The opening of the Elizabeth Line Crossrail might have given him a completely undeserved triumph, but in fact, it has left him with an equally undeserved calamity – “undeserved” in both cases because the decisions, the planning, the construction mostly pre-dated his time as Mayor and triumph or calamity they “merely” happened on his watch. Can he realistically achieve much in the three years left to him, given that Covid remains the significant factor that it is? Does he decide to go for a third term? Does he like Johnson before him, plan to return to the Commons? He will still only be 54 years old, so he still has time to achieve yet more. But if I know Sadiq, and I think I do, then he will have a pretty shrewd idea now of what he is going to do and he will not let on about it to anyone. - I think Leonie’s questions are easier, at least to pose. Does she decide
to be primarily the first Labour Leader of Wandsworth Council since 1978 or the deputy leader of Labour in the London Assembly? I know which I would consider the more important (what after all does being an Assembly member mean apart from getting a massive salary?). But on the other hand, being on the Assembly is arguably a better stepping stone to the Mayoralty (how about being London’s first female Mayor?) or a seat in the Commons. But either way, Leonie does not need to decide, nor will she, until after the May, 2022, Borough election, when she will discover whether she is, or is not, Leader of Wandsworth Council. - On the 11th May, Penny and I went for a walk in Nunhead
Cemetery. It’s well worth a visit in spring, or I guess in autumn for the falling leaves. Wildflowers and generally rampant undergrowth climb over magnificent late 19th and early 20th century statuary, spread across a very large site. A quick rule of thumb comparison on Google Maps suggests that it is about half the size of Battersea Park and almost completely empty – at least of live bodies! It also commands magnificent views of the city, with one view, in particular, focused on St. Paul’s Cathedral. It is actually a “protected” view (in planning terms, i.e. new buildings are not allowed to obstruct the view) as indeed is a similar distant view of the Cathedral from Richmond Park. - Talking of which, did you happen to see a recent list produced, by a Wandsworth news blog, of 10 special open-places to visit in South London? Strikingly we, in Wandsworth, are right in the epi-centre, with Richmond Park top of the list and others included Wimbledon Common, Battersea Park, Wandsworth Common (a mistake there I think as the write-up didn’t sound like the common I know), the Crystal Palace dinosaur Park, Nunhead Cemetery, Greenwich Park and a couple of complete strangers near Sidcup, south-east London. With all the travel restrictions we face today, perhaps we will bump into each other at one of these London beauty spots!
- On 25th May I had the Planning Applications Committee. In
the last couple of months, I have rather down-played the interest in this committee but May was different. As always there were a number of small and locally important applications but only two of major significance and they were both in Nine Elms. I voted against both, though the first vote was almost a gesture of frustration as I knew that it was really a box-ticking exercise at the “details” level of the process. Nonetheless, despite the poor re-production I hope you can see why I should be against such a monolithic construct! The second was a giant hotel next to, and destroying the view of, the American Embassy. - You might have seen coverage in the press of the new Nine Elms “Sky Pool”, which was opened in May. My Labour colleague, Aydin Dickerdem, who represents the area
of Nine Elms where the Sky Pool is situated, reminded me of my August 2015 Newsletter when I asked whether people had seen “the fantasy proposal for a swimming pool in the sky? Captioned in the Daily Telegraph as the “Glass-bottomed floating ‘sky pool’ to be unveiled in London”. Now, it is completed, it confirms my worst fears. It is a display of conspicuous consumption by an arrogant affluent class of developers, which reminds me of Marie Antoinette quipping that the starving Parisians of pre-revolutionary France should eat cake. No wonder she was soon to lose her head: I wouldn’t wish quite that on the planning committee and the developers responsible, but with the homeless walking the streets and foodbanks doing a roaring trade, they deserve some telling punishment. - On 26th May we had the Council’s Annual Meeting. All 60 of us in the Civic Suite were spaced out like candidates in a major public examination but instead of preventing us from cheating this lay-out was: so that we could socially distance. Of course, the effect was precisely the opposite, as it was clear we were meant to be unsocially distanced. This procedure was rather strange as these annual meetings are meant to be for the new Mayor’s family and friends to share a drink and a chat with everyone who attends. So we had a Mayor-Making when not one person talked to the Mayor. A new experience for all and especially for the Mayor, Richard Field, a councillor in Nightingale ward, Tooting.
- On 30th May Penny and I stayed with Mary Jay in Oxford.
Some of you, but not many I guess, will know Mary, the widow of Douglas Jay, Battersea’s Labour MP from 1946 to 1983. We were also there to introduce a Brazilian friend to both the city and the Bodleian Library. We took Antonio round Oxford and, in particular, round Magdalen College. Both looked magnificent in the early summer sun and, whilst we were in the Cloisters, this feathered friend popped by for a chat. - On 22nd April, I had the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) and, if I said that the March PAC, was uneventful, then the April version made it seem positively momentous. The interest in individual planning applications was still sufficient, however, to inspire the virtual attendance by 52 people – it was very rare for pre-Covid, pre-online PAC ever to have an audience of 50 – so perhaps there will be some benefits from the new post-Covid regime. But councillors and officers will have to learn a few more broadcasting related presentational skills if they expect to be taken seriously!
My Programme for June
- On June 7th I look forward to hearing Diane Hayter talking about the first 29 Labour MPs, who started the PLP, the Parliamentary Labour Party, in 1906.
- On June 10th, I am talking to a group of Croydon trade unionists about the rights and wrongs of having elected Mayors. Croydon is planning to have a referendum on the matter in the autumn and clearly many are undecided about which way to vote. I am very much opposed.
- On June 11th, I am going to give my knees a trial run on an 18-hole golf course for the first time in several years! Fortunately, my partner’s knees are worse than mine so we will be using buggies! Too much football for too many years did for our knees!
- The Planning Applications Committee (PAC) is on the 22nd
Did you Know: Last month I asked, “What was the connection between the famous Sydney Harbour Bridge and Battersea?”
And the answer was simply that the British company, Dorman Long, which won the contract to build the bridge, had a significant part of its London operation in Queenstown ward, Battersea.
And for this month can you tell me:
How many pubs are there in Latchmere ward? Their names? And how many have closed to your knowledge in the recent past and their names? And whilst I will be open to rational debate, I will be the final arbiter on what is, or is not, a pub, etc.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Battersea May 2021, Newsletter (# 143)
- Why is this newsletter so late in the month? Well, would you believe it? To keep well out of the way of breaking electoral law! The law says that anything, which could be construed as party political, and which is distributed in the build up to an election, MUST be counted as electoral expenditure and reported to the authorities. Now I wouldn’t actually go as far as to say that my newsletters are very party political but, unlike our Prime Minister, I am concerned about the legal niceties – hence the late publication of the newsletter. By the time you read this, of course, the election will be all over, which is why I am sending it now.
- I woke up on 6th April to the realisation that I am now 80 years old! I was not sure what I was going to do to mark the occasion. I had talked about parties for friends, family and politico friends, but that was before I realised how long Covid’s shadow was going to be. Actually, I did have a few phone calls and a number of Zoom parties with friends and family in various parts of London, Leamington, Winchester and Billericay. The big surprise, though, was a Zoom party organised for me by Labour colleagues in Battersea. I guess there were about 60 people there – a new and very, very pleasurable experience.
- Some of you will know that I am trying to find energy and time (or is it enthusiasm and drive?), to write a book about politics in Wandsworth, since 1964. The text is currently some 65,000 words long but I am only halfway through. Whilst researching for it, I have interviewed one or two of the main players and on 8th April I had a long chat with Martin Johnson, a Tory councillor for Northcote
from 1974-2018. During his long career, Martin was the number one (either as Chair or Cabinet Member), at various times, in charge of Wandsworth’s council houses, planning and roads, amongst a host of other council services. As we spoke, I was reminded of the important role he played, at quite some personal cost, in stopping the march of the urban motorway through much of the Borough and especially through, around, under and over Clapham Junction. The London Motorway Box was a threat to inner London posed by government-based traffic engineers, which was defeated locally by the Labour Council in the 70s and by the Tories, actually mainly Martin, in the 80s. If the engineers had won, London would have been turned into a mega-Spaghetti Junction. Martin took a correct and bold stance but, because he had defied the party machine, and most particularly Mrs. Thatcher, he lost popularity with his party colleagues and was effectively ignored by his party, ever afterwards. The picture shows Martin on an occasion marking his 40 years as a councillor.
- On 16th April, I had lunch in a pub garden with three friends. In what other year would one record that as an event? My first pub lunch for over a year! Then I had a hair cut, like millions of us – an event to record! And a few days later I went for a “surge test” – lots of strange, new experiences in a strange.
- I attended an XR (Extinction Rebellion) Wandsworth virtual meeting on 20th There were 50 or 60 people there and the meeting started off with five opening speeches about traffic calming, trees and the Council’s record in planting and growing trees, disinvesting the Council’s pension fund from fossil fuel companies and targeting its investment strategy towards “green” companies. XR’s objective was (and is) to make half a dozen demands of the Council. Their tactics, stated quite publicly, included any obstruction of the Council short of violence. I was not the only councillor attending, as I counted half a dozen others from both Labour and Tory parties. I later discussed it with some councillors from each side and was struck by the fact that I was rather more sympathetic to XR and its demands than many other councillors.
- The trouble is that some of XR’s demands were put in such intemperate terms that they were either impractical or border-line illegal and, in addition, a few of their assertions were inaccurate. Combined with the uncompromising tone of the demands, XR Wandsworth seemed more interested in bullying the Council into submission than in persuading the Council of the need to adopt totally “green” policies. I am afraid that the Council is more constrained by the law than is dreamed of in XR’s philosophy. The Council could not resolve, for example, to refuse any and all planning applications, which included the felling of trees at all – such a “pre-determination” would certainly result in refusals being reversed on appeal. The climate crisis is indeed a crisis but that doesn’t mean that XR have a monopoly of wisdom or the right policies, or that the Council can ignore political or legal realities. Acting together would provide faster and better solutions to what is a real crisis.
- On 22nd April, I had the Planning Applications Committee (PAC) and, if I said that the March PAC, was uneventful, then the April version made it seem positively momentous. The interest in individual planning applications was still sufficient, however, to inspire the virtual attendance by 52 people – it was very rare for pre-Covid, pre-online PAC ever to have an audience of 50.
- However, much to the horror of some councillors and lobbyists, the Government has decided that, as from 6th May, all meetings will have to take place – old-style. Personally, I don’t really believe that a diet of 100% online meetings is sustainable in the long-term. Our current online PAC works well enough, but I think that is because we know each other, and our relative strengths and weaknesses. Somehow, I doubt whether that would be the same with a new committee, a committee, which by definition would have a membership of strangers. But clearly some elements of the new online world will (or rather should) remain; having proved the viability of online committees. How can the Council in future deny the public the right to watch? How could the Council insist on the physical presence of a committee member, suffering from, say, flu when we all now know that an online presence would be perfectly possible? Wandsworth Council should lobby the Government and persuade the relevant Ministers that we cannot, or more properly should not, simply turn back the clock.
- I gave a talk, called “A brief history of Battersea 1800-2021”,
for the Battersea Society on 27th It was done on Zoom and there was an audience of about 70 or 80. Judging by the audience response after the talk, it went quite well. I certainly enjoyed doing it, but it is a strange experience talking to an audience, when you can’t see anyone’s reactions. Are they rolling around laughing or amazed by one’s stupidity or one’s brilliance? Is it going well or are they bored? This picture, by the way, is called “A view in the lanes near Battersea Fields” and was painted by William Bielby in 1788. It was my opening slide and, as you can see, there have been quite a few changes since! The talk can be seen at :
Access Passcode: #%L&&T7A
My Programme for May
- Political activity in May will be dominated by the London Mayoral and London Assembly elections on May 6th and inevitably everything that follows from those elections. This year, Sadiq Khan is the overwhelming favourite to continue as Mayor and the issue is just how are he and the Prime Minister going to get on working terms, because for the good of our city, they need to work together for the next three years.
- On 11th May I have a Wandsworth Conservation Area Advisory Committee.
- The 13th May is exactly 50 years after the first election, which I won as a councillor, then, believe it or not, for Northcote ward, which now, and then, was the safest Tory ward in Battersea! Just maybe that is something of an achievement. I know that there has never been any other councillor, who has “done” 50 years on Wandsworth Council, though I guess there might be one or two elsewhere in the country!
- The Planning Applications Committee is on 25th May and on the following day the Annual Meeting of the Council when we will be electing a new Mayor.
Did you Know: Last month I asked, “Where would you have had to go in 1886 to visit Battersea’s Little Hell?”
The answer was the area between Battersea Church Road and the Thames, which was the home of rapidly growing, very dirty, heavy industry such as Morgan Crucible’s
and of many of its workers living in very squalid slum conditions, unimaginable today.
And for this month can you tell me:
The connection between the famous Sydney Harbour Bridge, shown here, and Battersea?
Photo and © Tony Belton; resized by Tomos Jones