Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere January Newsletter (# 68)
December highlights
- I went to Nightingale School on 1st December. It is meant to be for difficult children. There is, of course, an “acceptable” description and that is an EBDS school or a school for pupils with emotional, behavioural and social difficulties. Let’s be honest: I was not impressed. OK, so I am no expert but in many ways this school felt more like a prison than a school. I will be keeping a close eye on it in future. I do not think it is the sort of place in which we ought to be raising our kids, even if (or especially if) they are children with difficulties.
- On the 8th I had the so-called Education and Standards Group, no excitement there, and on the next day the December Council Meeting. This was difficult for me! Having not been Leader of the Opposition for the best of part of four years now, I have got used to not playing as large a role in the Council Meeting but with many more Labour councillors (good thing) and far fewer Council meetings (really bad thing) for the first time in my memory – for the first time for 40 years maybe – I didn’t say a word! OK, I mock, and maybe I am taking the mickey out of myself to a degree. Nonetheless, our (the councillors that is) lessening role in the whole operation does make me wonder where democracy is going – at least at the local level. Should we just let the local government officers get on with it – make them all in effect national civil servants? Of course, I don’t think so. What do you think?
- Two days later I did see an interesting play at the Royal Court in Sloane Square called Hope, which posed many of the same issues. In the play, when the councillors refused to impose any more government imposed cuts, the civil servants did take over and everything got cut. I wrote a review of the play that you can see a couple of entries back on this blog.
- Talking of which did you
see/know about the Council’s threat to close Battersea’s Sports Centre in Hope Street. It was “announced” to the staff on 16th December. The Sports Centre is very busily used by well over 20 sports clubs and local organisations and it is not as though the area is over-endowed with alternatives. What did the Council’s own reports about the 2011 riots say – there was not a lot for young people to do in the area. But now they want to close down one of the busiest centres of them all! There is a petition for signature at the following address http://www.willtowin.org.uk/#!save-battersea-sports-centre/c150j if you wish to express your opposition. - The Planning Applications Committee was on the 16th. There was one significant local application, which was for shopping and housing development on the site of the Prince’s Head pub in Falcon Road. The pub has been far from popular with some of its neighbours for many years now and the thought of it being replaced with shops and 27 housing units will be welcome. The development at some 4/5 storeys will fit in with the general scale of the 1970’s estate. However, it is not the first time that an application has been approved for this site and there is no guarantee that it will happen; but let’s hope that it proceeds.
- There were two much larger applications on sites many Latchmere residents will know well. The first in the rather shambolic area immediately opposite Battersea Park Railway Station. It will include St. Mary’s Catholic School, Lockington Road, Patcham Terrace and railway viaducts and arches including a number of small neighbouring sites. The new development will have 290 housing units and a new purpose-built two-form entry school. There will also be a direct access route from Battersea Park station to a new entrance to Queenstown Road Station passing along what will effectively be a new road with shops and offices. One of the blocks will be 16 storeys high but although I am usually opposed to yet more high buildings in Battersea I thought that this was rather a good scheme and supported it.
- The second application is in the heart of Wandsworth and includes Welbeck House, yes the Council’s old Social Services Department, and the Housing Department office in 17-27 Garratt Lane, along with some South Thames College land. The application was for 201 residential units, 25% “affordable”, some commercial space and a new Wandsworth Town Centre library. But it also went up to 26 storeys and included some pretty uninspired looking architecture. I didn’t like it much and voted against.
- I spent Xmas with grandchildren and had a HAPPY NEW YEAR’s Eve at a Jazz Club I rather like in Streatham!.
My Programme for January
- I know some of you know about my wonky knee, thanks to a cycling holiday in Holland in September, 2013. Well on January 7th I had a minor operation, an “arthroscopy”, on that and, whilst strictly for my next newsletter, I will say that it seems to have gone quite well, though a bit stiff and sore. More next month!
- On the 12th I am going to the launch of a new Wandsworth Radio station, which is going to be based in Latchmere, in Battersea Park Road. There has been an internet based radio station covering Wandsworth called Raider’s for some time, but this new one is aimed solely at Wandsworth. Interesting and I hope I can tell you more about it and its launch next month.
- Yet again I have the so-called Education and Standards Group on 15th January.
- The Planning Applications Committee will be on the 20th.
- And then in the diary there is a “Special” Council Meeting on the 28th, but I don’t know why and I guess it is not going to happen! – so actually I haven’t got much on in January!
You may recall that last month I asked “Did you or do you know Fara Williams?” 
Well, I am afraid that there has not been any response as yet so I thought I’d go a bit further and test you out with a few views taken between Xmas and NY.
Here they are with a couple of quiz questions:-
On the left, what and where is this?
And where is this below, what would it be called up North (Yorkshire & Lancashire), and which roads does it link? 
Where is this gypsy encampment? This one is a stone’s throw
outside Latchmere. The other two are in the ward.
High Rise developments in London – and Battersea
Just in case anyone out there still believes that the development of high rise residential blocks, on the Battersea river-front and all round the Nine Elms Lane area, has anything to do with housing need or provision of housing for Londoners then see “The Super-Rich and Us” on iPlayer BBC2 last night, 8th January at 9 pm.
This is an excellent analysis by Jacques Peretti of the tax haven and property speculation hub London has become with Battersea playing one of the major roles in the property area. The one thing it misses out on is, not only are these properties nothing whatsoever to do with supplying demand, but they are actually worsening the position.
I am not sure quite how to prove my point but I have more than sufficient anecdotal “evidence” to suggest that the ludicrous property boom along the Battersea river-front far from reducing prices in the market (which is surely what classic economics would suggest) is actually encouraging house and rental inflation in the rest of Battersea/Vauxhall, etc.
This should be compulsory viewing for all those Tory councillors and their not inconsiderable number of Labour sympathisers who believe that building more and more is anything like a sufficient response to the housing crisis. We desperately need more control of the market – oh and pretty hefty taxation of the rich!
Hope by Jack Thorne at the Royal Court
Compulsory entertainment for Labour councillors struggling with Tory cuts in local government!
Saw this play at the Royal Court just before Xmas and I thoroughly recommend it for all Labour councillors and perhaps for some LDs and Tories too. It reminded me very strongly of my own experiences many years ago when as a raw, young Labour councillor I thought that Ted Heath was setting about destroying local government with his Housing Finance Act. It may seem odd now to think of the contortions that we went through then and all over a 50P enforced rent rise on Council tenants but this play recalled some of the same raw emotions.
The claustrophobic nature of politics comes through strongly. Non-politicians may think that practising politicians get absurdly isolated from the “people” but the voters don’t usually have the experience of the hot-house, or any idea of the pressures and of the criticism. This play gives a taste of what it is like.
How much do you cut? How much of a gesture of opposition do you pose to the overwhelming power of Whitehall? Do you fight to the last and leave the final decisions to the civil servants drafted in to take over? Or do you sell your conscience down the river and win a few small concessions? Do you take the pain of local opposition by trimming? Or the contempt of your electorate for ducking the issue?
One difference from the 1970s, as I recall them, is the absence of the “revolting” masses. Then we had marches on Town Halls and national federations of tenant associations urging on the rebels. Today, with the threat to local government arguably even greater than it was then, just where are the protests against this government’s suicidal austerity policy. I suppose the difference is that we lost that battle against central government dictation and, since then, everyone has known that in the end Whitehall will win.
Ironically, of course, the masses might win with the coming defeat of all the mainstream parties, leaving us with years of resolving the differences between left and right without any party really articulating the left. Is that the irony in the title – Hope? Is Thorne suggesting that the only hope is for the Labour Party to come out of its slumbers and issue a rallying call to the left? I would like to think so, but my word, there is some way to go!
PS Tom Georgeson, Wandsworth LP member, takes the acting plaudits with his portrayal of the ex-Leader of this gritty small, northern town. The dramatic action is limited, even if the politics is raw and real.
PPS The Housing Finance Act, 1971, led to central, nationalised control of council rents, which previously had been entirely in the control of local authorities, who had been free to subsidise rents from other council funds. It began by enforcing a 50P rent increase from 1st April 1972 and was resisted by many Labour authorities. It may have only been 50P but with hindsight it was clearly the first major defeat for local government, which has had more and more powers stripped from it ever since regardless of the bogus claims of increased localism by both the Blair/Brown and Cameron governments.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere December Newsletter (# 67)
November highlights
- I had an unusually sporty start to November. My partner, rather uncharacteristically, suddenly said that she wanted to go to some “big” sporting events so we went to Twickenham to see Australia take on the Barbarians on the 1st November and on the 15th we went to the semi-final of the ATP World Tour Finals tennis tournament at the O2. Now, at the cost of losing support all over Latchmere, I have to say that big-time rugby does not do an awful lot for me, even when 76 points are scored! Modern stadia are so big that you are miles from the action even when it is down your end but when a high proportion of the action is in the scrum and even Brian Moore, on the telly, can’t tell you what is happening then what are you meant to make of it in Row ZZ? But we were lucky at the O2. We had great tickets and saw what was, by common consent, the best match of the tournament – Roger Federer’s 4-6, 7-5, 7-6 (6) win over fellow Swiss Stan Wawrinka.

I went to the Fireworks Display in Battersea Park on
8th November. It was a bit wet and miserable and probably for that reason not as crowded as the previous year. The fireworks really are spectacular. Two things about it struck me, well three actually. Ever since the 2000 Sydney Olympics these shows appear to have been dominated by Oz-choreography (Is that the word for someone who designs firework displays?). Are our friends, the Australians, now the world’s experts on fireworks? Secondly, whilst the fusion of music and fireworks is dramatic and incredibly well done, does the sheer volume of the music detract from some of the pleasure? I used to enjoy hearing the “Oohs and Aahs” of the crowd and the excited shrieks of the kids but nowadays everything is drowned out by massively amplified music.
Who agrees with me? Third as I gazed at the rockets a mere 3 or maybe 4,000 feet above are the airliners coming in to Heathrow. What do passengers, who know nothing of Guy Fawkes, think? Do any wonder whether they have entered a war zone?- Talking of war zones, earlier on the same day I had been to the Emanuel School First World War centenary exhibition. It was a very personal exhibition in that it had school photographs and memorabilia associated with old boys (and staff) from the school relating to war during the last 100 years. I was particularly taken with this doodle in a school exercise book from 1943, which clearly depicts a Spitfire along with a tank and a couple of other fighter planes.
- On the 9th I went to the Remembrance Day service in
St. Mary’s, Battersea, along with Wendy and Simon, my fellow Latchmere councillors, Sally-Ann Ephson, Queenstown councillor, and Will Martindale, Labour’s Parliamentary candidate in next May’s General Election.. The ceremony was a suitably sombre and moving occasion and was followed as always by a march past. For me, however, the “real” and moving occasion is at 11.00 on the 11th itself in Battersea Park. There is something about the open-air nature of the ceremony, with the late autumn leaves falling and crows and sea gulls wheeling around under leaden skies, which always makes it very appropriate. - On that very same evening I took part in the interview panel for the Deputy Director of Education at Wandsworth Council. The successful candidate was Catherine Duffy.
- On the evening of the 10th November, I was at the Civic Awards presentation, which is always an enjoyable occasion where the borough “honours” volunteers, who have had a record of service to the Borough. One award recipient, who may be known to many readers, is Liz Shaw. Liz is well known for her charitable work and fundraising, especially her organising of the Xmas Day Party for the Elderly held on Xmas Day itself in Battersea Park. She is also known as a freelance photographer to be seen behind the lens at many a Wandsworth event.
- The Planning Applications Committee on the 12th considered a mass of applications but was totally dominated by the Covent Garden Market application. This of course lies outside of Latchmere ward but the giant scale of this application will affect the whole of Wandsworth and is therefore worth at least a mention! The site is actually bigger than the Battersea Power Station site and covers the whole area of the so-called Covent Garden Market Towers and the flower market, the vast sheds of the vegetable market on the Wandsworth Road side of the railway, the large entrance site on Nine Elms Lane and quite a few smaller ancillary sites tucked round the edge of the area. (By the way, from the mid-nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries, this huge site included the old Nine Elms station and the London and South-Western railway works and believe it or not I can just remember steam trains crossing Nine Elms Lane.)
- This development was all described in one giant application, reported to the Committee in a paper of more than 200 pages in length. The application provided for over 3,000 new homes, let alone a new Covent Garden market, offices, new shopping, a new school, public open space, a playing field, access roads and a car-park. How exactly the Committee is meant to make a clear and sensible Yes/No decision on such an enormous application, I do not know – we are not allowed to amend but merely say Yes or No. It clearly leaves masses of question marks over a planning process, which covers both, say, roof extensions worth say £50,000 and applications of this kind which will take ten years to implement in full and will cost several £billions. But we did our best! I voted against the application although some of you seek to persuade me that all modern development is inevitable and really good but then again others claim that it is usually evil and ugly.
- So here are a few words in self-defence! I knew that the application would be passed and therefore I had what one might describe as a free vote – I knew my vote would not make a difference on the night but that it was an expression of opinion, which may or may not affect future applications. And I have several criticisms of all these vast developments that we are now seeing in Nine Elms. My first, and main objection, is that there is nowhere near enough provision of so-called affordable housing. There is plenty of discussion in political circles about what affordable might mean and whether housing said to be affordable for people on £50,000 a year is really affordable or not for the majority of Wandsworth residents. My position is simply that there is not enough affordable housing, whatever the definition.
- Secondly, and this I know is contentious, I think we are providing far too much retail space. With two giant new Westfield Centres now within easy train journeys access from Clapham Junction and with more and more people doing their shopping on-line, I think that developers are being far too bullish about the need for shopping centres in Nine Elms – especially if we are going to protect the existing Clapham Junction, Wandsworth, Balham, Putney and
Tooting shopping centres. Over-develop and some of these other centres will suffer. Actually, I am winning hands-down on this issue as every time developers come back with revised plans, and they often do, the shopping is down-sized. - Thirdly, and far more contentious still, I do not like the march of ever higher tower blocks into both the Borough and the City. A couple of the tower blocks we agreed in November are going to be even higher than the Tower, which is shown on the right of this picture from Lambeth Bridge.
- On the 24th the Education and Children’s Services Committee considered the admissions criteria for primary schools and a whole raft of other issues. The controversial issue for primary schools is that some parents can afford to “work” the system, by buying or renting property near the “best” schools so as to ensure that their little ones go to the schools with the best examination results – at the cost of some very local children, who get displaced. This is a major issue in south Battersea but for some reason or other does not seem to cause such concern in Latchmere.
- You may recall that I made some critical remarks last month about what was happening to Westbridge primary school, Bolingbroke Walk. The problems related to it becoming part of the Chapel Street Academy Trust. Well I heard early in December that the Trust has taken steps to address the problems that all the Education Committee members saw and have strengthened the governance of the school and provided greater support to the Head. Let’s hope these measures work!
My Programme for December
- I went to Nightingale School on 1st December.
- On the 8th I had the so-called Education and Standards Group.
- The December Council Meeting was held on the 10th.
- The Planning Applications Committee was on the 16th.
- And then there was Xmas and a HAPPY NEW YEAR to you all.
Finally did you or do you know Fara Williams?
Do you know England’s greatest footballer – at least in terms of
being the most capped player in English history. Fara Williams, pictured here, has been capped for England 131 times – and for Great Britain in the Olympics 5 times. She now plays professionally for Liverpool Ladies, having played for Chelsea, Charlton and Everton. She is employed by the Women’s FA as a skills coach.
Why do I mention her here? Because I recently read about her history in a national newspaper article and learnt that she grew up on a North Battersea estate, which has got to mean that Fara stands a pretty fair chance of having been a Latchmere resident. Her history includes being homeless and living on the streets for some of her early England career. I also think that she might have gone to Elliott School before it became an Ark Academy.
Whatever the history
and whatever the details, and I hope some of you might be able to fill in some of them, it is clear that her fame would be far greater if she was a man who had played over 100 times for England (she compares her mid-field role to that of Steven Gerard’s) and represented the country at 2 World and 3 European championships. Can anyone help me with this story, because she should be recognised by the Borough!
Leviathan – a Review
Leviathan is an immensely powerful film about corruption. It starts slowly and builds up to a crescendo assault on the hypocrisy of the established Orthodox church and the Russian state in unison. The sweep of the film is as vast as the drear Arctic landscape and its targets are legion, ranging from the casual drunken violence of the men and the pusillanimous submissiveness of the women, from the dereliction imposed on the landscape by the inheritance of the communist era to the mindless exploitation of kleptocratic capitalism. It hardly needed the giant skeleton of a long dead whale gracing the shore to point out the symbolism.
The country is littered with wrecked fishing boats, a vandalised church, unsurfaced roads and ruined lives. The consumption of Vodka is on an epic scale; the casual gun culture is ironically reminiscent of one’s worst fears about the Americas, both Latin and USA. What hope is there for the future, for the adolescent left as the rootless survivor of this tragedy?
A woman in the audience said, as we left, that she was left speechless by this Andrey Zvyagintsev film. She was the only one of us who was able to say anything at all. If this was a statement of modern Russia then the one positive was that somehow the authorities allowed it to be shown in Cannes where unsurprisingly it won an award. But apart from that the film showed with brutal candour the total corruption of a society, which appears to have lost all sense of purpose, sense of self, self-belief.
Target practice for the shooters were Brezhnev, Gorbachev and other dinosaurs from the past but not Yeltsin, “too insubstantial to bother with”, nor the current leader, “history has not yet had time to assess”. But we didn’t get round to that action – stalled as we were by seduction and violent brawling.
Was there anything encouraging about the film? Well, yes, through all the beautifully acted stages of drunkenness nevertheless the essential humanity of the lead figures came through. The women may have been down-trodden victims of violence but they were the ones who kept society running, whether as the mind-numbing officers of the state or doing the worst jobs, and the men had a certain tragic nobility.
There is so much to say about this film. The descent from the noble statue of Lenin to the tawdry, faded picture of Putin watching over the shoddy, shabby nature of the formica topped tables in the Mayor’s office and the desperate loneliness of the quality (?) restaurant alone were subjects for a book. But don’t take my word for it. If you have any interest in great films, in Russia, in tragedy, then break a leg to go and see this film.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere November Newsletter (# 66)
October highlights
- I went to a Covent Garden Market Authority reception at Brunswick House on 2nd October. I wouldn’t norma
lly comment on such an occasion, which was a wine and canapés reception designed to keep corporate Wandsworth happy with the Market’s plans for development but for two things. First because Brunswick House is that rather grand, isolated house on the corner of Nine Elms Lane and Wandsworth Road, which, although in Lambeth, must be well known to many Wandsworth residents. It was built for the Duke of Brunswick in 1759 and is a posh restaurant and reception facility. If you recognise the picture here then you know that it sticks out like a sore thumb in the traffic and architectural hell of Vauxhall.The second reason that I mention it is because of the massive planning application going forward to the Planning Applications Committee on 12th November, of which more next month. However, the essence is a very large scale reconstruction of the market, which will not in the market traders’ view be to their benefit. Many of them come from generations of old traditional traders, who operated out of the (real) old Covent Garden of My Fair Lady days. The proposals also include very large scale residential developments – watch this space next month. - I visited a couple of schools in October. I went to Holy Ghost RC primary school, Nightingale Square, on 14th and Westbridge primary school, Bolingbroke Walk, on 15th October – what an interesting contrast! Holy
Ghost is in the heart of rich South Battersea, where every house is worth a million, well that’s the image anyway. The school is very pleasant and very rich, and Ofsted says outstanding. The parents were asked to fund a £100,000+ adaptation of a classroom and they did it – no sweat – and here is a picture of the end result. Westbridge, previously known as Bolingbroke, however, did not get a good Ofsted report. So Michael Gove insisted on it becoming part of the Chapel Street Academy Trust. At the Education Standards Group on 22nd October we met with Chapel Street. I am afraid that I was not convinced that Chapel Street Academy Trust had any record in achieving success with its schools. If you want to read my views on this process then have a look here in my blog. - Early in October, Labour councillors got hold of a confidential discussion paper produced by Town Hall officers for the Tory majority party in control in Wandsworth. Essentially the paper says that, if the Government goes ahead with the expected scale of cuts in local government expenditure, then Wandsworth is going to have to cut lots of services in order to make ends meet. Here are some of the cuts (or as the Council will say “savings”) the paper suggests amongst others:-
- access to parking permits, benefits, council tax queries, etc. online only – NO paper, post or counter service (just imagine, even if you do not agree with me about the scale of benefits, telling the poorest in our community that they can only get benefits if they go online!);
- closure of one of the Battersea day centres for the elderly, Randall Close or the Gwyneth Morgan centre;
- closure of Tooting Bec athletic track and Hope Street’s Battersea Sports Centre;
- closure of York Gardens, Northcote Road and Battersea Park libraries; reduced frequency of street cleaning.
- This is NOT to say that these cuts will ALL take place but there is a very high probability that most of them willI think the Government is pursuing a disastrous policy and that austerity will not work. It is not working in the EU and I don’t see why anyone should expect it to work here. From my point of view what is even worse is that the Labour Party is not really challenging this Tory view. We are prepared to bail out bankers at enormous public expense. It would cost far less to increase the minimum wage, not by measly 20P an hour but, by several pounds an hour. We need the public to have pounds in their pocket and to start spending in the high street.
- One of the big stories of the year, and next year, must surely be the possible arrival of Formula E motor racing in Battersea Park. The race would be round the perimeter road of the Park. The road would need some slight re-shaping and re-surfacing, which would be paid for by the race organisers. In future years the Council would get a large injection of funds, probably several £millions. Given the scale of cuts the Council is facing this is clearly a plan which a responsible Council must consider. However, there is much to be said also against the scheme and the inevitable disruption it would cause to the Park at the height of summer. It is expected to attract roughly the same number of punters as does the Fireworks Display, which, by the way, is on 8th November this year. It is, however, interesting that Formula 1 racing is aware that the sport must face up to a wide range of environmental issues – e-cars will be very quiet and fuel efficient and there is little doubt that it is likely to appeal to many in Battersea’s very young population.English Heritage, which funded much of the Park’s refurbishment, will be consulted and will have to agree and so will the Council. There is going to be a public meeting at All Saint’s Church, Prince of Wales Drive, on 6th Novem
ber when we will see to some extent what the Battersea public think about it. - Talking of English Heritage imagine my surprise when I saw a copy of their members’ magazine for October. It includes a picture of last year’s Mayor unveiling Latchmere’s blue plaque to John Archer, accompanied by me and Wendy Speck!
- Talking of Mayors, just a quick update on the Boris bikes. In summary use of the bikes in Wandsworth has increased from approximately 10,000 a month in January to 44,000 in July. Unsurprisingly usage is down from July but still much higher than earlier in the year (January-July statistics are attached). We will be able to make serious comparisons when we have a full year’s statistics.
- On 27th October I, and several other councillors, visited the newly opened Caius House Youth Centre in Holman Road, which has many Latchmere users. You may remember I went there a few months ago before it was finished. It’s a superb facility with an excellent sports hall, a recording studio, a well equipped kitchen and plenty of other facilities. This women’s’ basketball game illustrates the quality of the facilities.

- On the 15th there was the full Council Meeting, but I am afraid that there is not much to say about that. It was all very predictable and, if I am honest, we have allowed the Tory councillors to take all the meat out of Council Meetings. Prime Minister’s Question-time is not the great stage for the House of Commons that MPs like to think it is but Wandsworth Council meetings have become bloodless, uncontroversial, uninteresting occasions, which is evidenced by the absence of the press and almost any members of the public.
- The day after I attended the Planning Applications Committee. There were
two major decisions with Borough-wide implications. One was approval for a new residential and shopping development in Parkgate Road but the really massive application was the “final” approval for the Battersea Power Station site. The picture is of a model that displayed the final scheme.I am unhappy with these developments and voted against both of them. It is not that I do not want development – I have been pressing for action on the Power Station for 30 years! However, I am unhappy that all of these developments and the residential accommodation that comes with them is targeted at the super-rich and will do nothing to help the crisis of affordable housing facing the average Londoner. Indeed these developments will continue to force up the price of all other housing in Battersea and make it more and more an enclave for the super-rich. - On 30th October I went to Burntwood School to see (and hear) the
students of Wandsworth’s National Opera Studio singing a selection of songs from great operas by Donizetti, Puccini, Mozart, Tchaikovsky and Offenbach. Here is the ensemble taking the final curtain call. If you ever get a chance to hear these students give a free rehearsal then jump at it – they are terrific. The Opera studio gives frequent, free concerts, usually at All Saints Church in Wandsworth High Street. They are magnificent and if you are interested let me know and I will tell you the dates of their next concerts.
My Programme for November
- I will go to the Fireworks Display in Battersea Park on 8th November.
- On 9th and 11th I will be at the Remembrance Day services in St. Mary’s, Battersea, and in Battersea Park.
- On the evening of the 10th November there is the Civic Awards presentation.
- On the 11th I will be part of the appointments panel for the Deputy Director of Education at Wandsworth Council
- The Planning Applications Committee is on the 12th.
- On the 22nd I will be attending the London Summit, which is Mayor Johnson hosted Conference about all the issues facing London.
- On the 24th I will be leading the Labour councillors on the Education and Children’s Services Committee.
- On the 25th I will be visiting Alderbrook primary school.
Did you know Latchmere in 1912? Of course not.
Here is an extract from an Ordnance Map of London, published in 1912. Sorry about the reflected flash light in it – must improve my tech skills! But it does show most obviously that the road pattern has not changed that much except for where the Winstanley and York Road estates are and where Trinity Road has been linked up to Wandsworth Bridge.It also shows the string of industrial plants along the river-front, which made this area such a strong working class area. It also shows the mouth of Battersea Creek, where the Heliport now stands, and the aptly named Creek Street, running into Lavender Road. I hope you find it interesting!
Schools, community and local authorities
I attended Wandsworth’s Education & Standards Group (ESG) last Wednesday (22/10/14). It is an attempt by the Tory Council to maintain some kind of role in our fractured education system. Given the competent, conscientious set of Tory members on the Group, the review seems to be working but I am sure it is an illusion! It is all based on the “magician’s smoke and mirrors”.
Until 1997, the British (actually English and Welsh) education system was a largely coherent, local government controlled system. The Blair Government decided to add to this mix “independent” academies and faith schools, where independent meant funded by national government but run by largely autonomous organisations. But then in 2010 the truly Jacobin Michael Gove became the Secretary of State and he set about introducing academies, faith and free schools as quickly as possible. He made it impossible for local authorities to build new schools, even in areas of fast population growth like London and he forced any school with a poor inspection report out of the state system. This haste was a naked attempt to destroy the traditional structure by the time of the coming 2015 General Election.
But I happen to believe that Wandsworth Tories see the dangers of this policy and are using the ESG (and its similar Free Schools and Academies Commission) to try and mitigate the worst effects of Govian chaos. The Group’s main function is interviewing the Heads and Chairs of Governors, usually of two schools in an evening, in a four yearly cycle. The purpose is to assess the school’s performance and to help schools to improve or to maintain it. The role is, however, largely advisory, since Ofsted clearly makes the inspections and the assessments that really count.
This lack of a formal role may not matter too much with schools operating well, where a few words of encouragement and appreciation from the local authority are all that is required. But what if the school has difficulties? One school we saw last week, according to Ofsted, “requires improvement” and “is not good because”, amongst other things, “teaching across the school requires improvement”. To be fair that assessment was made in 2012 and, since then the school has a new governing board and has been taken over by the Chapel Street Schools – a new group of academies. Nonetheless Wandsworth’s own education officer, and indeed the councillors, were clearly not convinced that the performance is improving sufficiently rapidly to be of much help to the current cohort of school kids.
Chapel Street Schools Trust, according to its website, is linked to the Salvation Army. There are eight such schools although two of them are not due to become Chapel Street Schools until 2015 or 2016 and two others, including the Wandsworth school, have only become Chapel Street schools this year, having been forced out of the local authority structure by the Government. The Trust did not even exist in January, 2012.
Do Chapel Street Schools have any experience in getting a school, required to improve, in fact to improve? Do their seven staff (again apparently and according to their website) have any relevant experience? Well one or two of them have been teachers but that’s about it. As the discussion about the school’s progress developed, I couldn’t help but wonder what the Council’s education officer and his inspector colleague thought of the matter. They after all are only responsible for running 85 schools most of which now achieve Ofsted ratings of “outstanding” or “good”!
What can we do about our concerns? Can we help the school through its difficult patch? Can we help with skilled resources? Apparently not as it is no longer a local authority school. We can, however, ask to go and visit the appropriate Regional Schools Commissioner and tell him our concerns.
Who you might well ask is s/he? Well in Wandsworth’s case it is the South London and South East Commissioner to whom we should turn. He is one Dominic Herrington, who until recently was a senior civil servant and Director of the DFE’s Academies Group. As far as I can tell Mr. Herrington is solely accountable to the Secretary of State. Nothing in the structure has anything remotely to do with the public or elected authorities, except of course that the Secretary of State is an elected MP but appointed to the job by the Prime Minister. Herrington’s appointment was announced, without fanfare, in a Departmental press release in September, 2014.
The Commissioners for the other regions are: two Chief Executive Officers of Academy Trusts; Essex’s Director of Education; the Heads of two grammar schools and of two Academy schools. The trenchant views of the General Secretary of the NUT are worth reading at http://teachers.org.uk/node/21434.
None of these regional commissioners seem to have anything remotely like democratic legitimacy. Yet between them they control, or at least oversee, millions and millions of public money. David Cameron, and his Education Secretary Michael Gove (most of the damage was done prior to the Cabinet re-shuffle), have successfully led an assault on much of local democracy and local accountability.
Academies, faith and free schools are all, of course, overwhelmingly funded by us, the taxpayers yet they are free from any democratic overview except at the rarefied national, Secretary of State level. Will a Labour Government have the courage to restore a coherent, democratic education system? Will the on-the-ground experience of councillors, who regularly visit and oversee schools, be lost from the system, to be replaced by faceless non-elected commissioners?
School Governors & governance.2
Hilary writes to tell me that I am wrong (see blog earlier this month). She tells me that skills are necessary in the modern governing board and that the time of the stakeholder is past. Well I agree on the last point but that is a regret and I need to thank Hilary for forcing me to make my point more clearly.
It is actually worse than I relayed. Now that we are looking for skill sets and not stakeholders we are also handing over most of the appointment process to the Head. The end result is not likely to be people in a very strong position to challenge either head or school.
In my considerable experience as a governor, it was mainly the stakeholders, who had the self-confidence and frankly the clout to challenge the head or the school’s ingrained modus operandi. In future as more and more governors are appointed through school controlled mechanisms there will be, in my submission, less and less, not more and more, challenge.
As once a technician and for a long-time a councillor, I think I know, which was the more likely to be a challenger. Give me the councillor over a financial whizz any day.
School Governance & Governors
A recent Wandsworth Council report blithely announced that governing bodies are being shifted from a stakeholder model to one based on skill sets. There was clearly a presumption that this was not only the Government’s intention but also a “good thing”. Well as a semi-detached governor of some 20/30 years standing, I have a rather different view.
I take it that the stakeholder model refers to school governing bodies dominated by local authority nominees, or local politicians, community representatives, teachers, trade unions and others with a “stakeholder” involvement with the school. I am further assuming that the move towards skill sets refers to knowledge of budgets, of HR skills, and the thousand and one other skills that could be said to make up the requirements of a managing board. I suppose the polite way of describing this is calling it a professionalization of the governing body role.
Could anything be worse! Surely the point of the governing body is not to do the work of the professional staff, or to be unpaid accountants and treasurers, or to stand in for what the local authority once did, or to manipulate spreadsheets, but to make the school part of the community. It is really important that the community should have a say in its local schools, but under this Government schools are becoming independent businesses run by and frequently in the interests of the heads.
Let’s hope that it is not too late for an incoming Government to stop and indeed reverse this trend.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere October Newsletter (# 65)
September highlights
- I had a Big Local lunch on 11th September – not real business I know,
but it does help to keep in touch. Here is a picture of us in Fish in a Tie in Falcon Road, which by the way, if you have never been there, is just about the nicest, cheapest food of its style that you can get in Battersea. Stephen Holsgrove the head of Thames Christian College is on the left and then Sandra Munoz, me, Senia Dedic, my councillor colleague Wendy Speck, Providence House youth club boss Robert Musgrave and Pennethorne resident Andy Beech. - In my new role as Labour’s Speaker on education I have had several meetings with senior education staff in an attempt to catch up with the current issues. And one in particular came up at the Education and Children’s Services Committee on 17th September and that was the subject of admissions to primary schools. At the moment admissions are based on proximity to the school but also on siblings, that is whether a child already has a brother or sister at the relevant school. In essence the Council is wondering whether the so-called siblings rule should be scrapped and admissions solely based on proximity to the school. The Council is going out to consultation on the matter. What do you think? Do you think that if a child has a brother or sister at a school s/he should have priority in a schools’ admissions policy or should it just be based on proximity to the school. Let me know what you t
hink! - I went to GCSE Success’s Annual General Meeting on 20th September. It was held at York Gardens Library. I do think this is a fascinating voluntary organisation. Set up by a resident of Pennethorne House, Ella Spencer, it is devoted to helping kids on the local estates fulfil their potential at GCSEs and get the best possible exam results. If anyone has a son/daughter who needs volunteer specialist assistance to get through examinations I recommend that you get them to York Gardens Library on a Saturday morning at 10 am!
- On the 25th I went to the Tooting Labour Party’s fund raising dinner, where the guest speaker was Jack Straw. Here is a picture of him giving his after dinner speech. He made a robust defence of the Labour Government’s actions in Iraq, including the current bombing campaign against Isis. I am afraid that I am not convinced and am rather inclined to the view that the west cannot resolve what is clearly a Middle Eastern Civil War. I have seen it compared with Europe’s seventeenth century Thirty Years War between Protestant and Catholic – I rather fear that it is an apt comparison.
- I did not this year go to the Labour Party Conference, which seems not to have been a very exciting occasion! But I rather suspect that the confidence that the Tory Party showed at their conference last week is going to turn out to be misplaced.
- I went on a tour of Wayford Street and Este Road estates on 30th. It was
pretty uneventful but we came across this piece of graffiti on the wall at the junction between Wayford Street and Candahar Road. Take a careful look. It is a picture of a dove of peace, I guess, holding under its left wing a knife, a pistol, a hand grenade and an AK 47. Is it a cry of pain against the barbarities going on in the Middle East? It certainly is very political. - On 17th September the weather was so beautiful that I decided to take the day off and take the train from CJ to Brighton for the day. I came across the Western Pavilion, which I had never seen before. It was built in 1827 by Amon Henry Wilds, an architect who had worked on the famous Pavilion, for a rich client. Below is a picture of it and I am sure many of you can see the similarities between it and the Royal Pavilion. Whilst I was there I also took a picture of the rather sad sight of the West Pier rotting and crumbling into the sea.
My Programme for October.
- I have meetings about the New Covent Garden development on 2nd and 6th
- I am visiting the Holy Ghost primary school in Nightingale Square on 14th.
- There is the now only quarterly Council meeting on 15th October and Planning Applications Committee on 16th.
- I hope to be at the Caius House youth club on the 27th.
Did you see Christ Church in the Guardian on 1st October? 
The picture is by photographer David Levene and is of Christ Church School’s vegetable garden. I don’t know why it found its way into the Guardian’s centre spread but it is a great picture of the children in the garden, which is behind a fence on Fownes Road, squeezed in between the estate and the main railway lines out of Clapham Junction. I was there when the school first took over this spare plot and it is just amazing to see the transformation they have made to what was an overgrown site. Well done, Christ Church.

