School Governance & Governors
A recent Wandsworth Council report blithely announced that governing bodies are being shifted from a stakeholder model to one based on skill sets. There was clearly a presumption that this was not only the Government’s intention but also a “good thing”. Well as a semi-detached governor of some 20/30 years standing, I have a rather different view.
I take it that the stakeholder model refers to school governing bodies dominated by local authority nominees, or local politicians, community representatives, teachers, trade unions and others with a “stakeholder” involvement with the school. I am further assuming that the move towards skill sets refers to knowledge of budgets, of HR skills, and the thousand and one other skills that could be said to make up the requirements of a managing board. I suppose the polite way of describing this is calling it a professionalization of the governing body role.
Could anything be worse! Surely the point of the governing body is not to do the work of the professional staff, or to be unpaid accountants and treasurers, or to stand in for what the local authority once did, or to manipulate spreadsheets, but to make the school part of the community. It is really important that the community should have a say in its local schools, but under this Government schools are becoming independent businesses run by and frequently in the interests of the heads.
Let’s hope that it is not too late for an incoming Government to stop and indeed reverse this trend.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere October Newsletter (# 65)
September highlights
- I had a Big Local lunch on 11th September – not real business I know,
but it does help to keep in touch. Here is a picture of us in Fish in a Tie in Falcon Road, which by the way, if you have never been there, is just about the nicest, cheapest food of its style that you can get in Battersea. Stephen Holsgrove the head of Thames Christian College is on the left and then Sandra Munoz, me, Senia Dedic, my councillor colleague Wendy Speck, Providence House youth club boss Robert Musgrave and Pennethorne resident Andy Beech. - In my new role as Labour’s Speaker on education I have had several meetings with senior education staff in an attempt to catch up with the current issues. And one in particular came up at the Education and Children’s Services Committee on 17th September and that was the subject of admissions to primary schools. At the moment admissions are based on proximity to the school but also on siblings, that is whether a child already has a brother or sister at the relevant school. In essence the Council is wondering whether the so-called siblings rule should be scrapped and admissions solely based on proximity to the school. The Council is going out to consultation on the matter. What do you think? Do you think that if a child has a brother or sister at a school s/he should have priority in a schools’ admissions policy or should it just be based on proximity to the school. Let me know what you t
hink! - I went to GCSE Success’s Annual General Meeting on 20th September. It was held at York Gardens Library. I do think this is a fascinating voluntary organisation. Set up by a resident of Pennethorne House, Ella Spencer, it is devoted to helping kids on the local estates fulfil their potential at GCSEs and get the best possible exam results. If anyone has a son/daughter who needs volunteer specialist assistance to get through examinations I recommend that you get them to York Gardens Library on a Saturday morning at 10 am!
- On the 25th I went to the Tooting Labour Party’s fund raising dinner, where the guest speaker was Jack Straw. Here is a picture of him giving his after dinner speech. He made a robust defence of the Labour Government’s actions in Iraq, including the current bombing campaign against Isis. I am afraid that I am not convinced and am rather inclined to the view that the west cannot resolve what is clearly a Middle Eastern Civil War. I have seen it compared with Europe’s seventeenth century Thirty Years War between Protestant and Catholic – I rather fear that it is an apt comparison.
- I did not this year go to the Labour Party Conference, which seems not to have been a very exciting occasion! But I rather suspect that the confidence that the Tory Party showed at their conference last week is going to turn out to be misplaced.
- I went on a tour of Wayford Street and Este Road estates on 30th. It was
pretty uneventful but we came across this piece of graffiti on the wall at the junction between Wayford Street and Candahar Road. Take a careful look. It is a picture of a dove of peace, I guess, holding under its left wing a knife, a pistol, a hand grenade and an AK 47. Is it a cry of pain against the barbarities going on in the Middle East? It certainly is very political. - On 17th September the weather was so beautiful that I decided to take the day off and take the train from CJ to Brighton for the day. I came across the Western Pavilion, which I had never seen before. It was built in 1827 by Amon Henry Wilds, an architect who had worked on the famous Pavilion, for a rich client. Below is a picture of it and I am sure many of you can see the similarities between it and the Royal Pavilion. Whilst I was there I also took a picture of the rather sad sight of the West Pier rotting and crumbling into the sea.
My Programme for October.
- I have meetings about the New Covent Garden development on 2nd and 6th
- I am visiting the Holy Ghost primary school in Nightingale Square on 14th.
- There is the now only quarterly Council meeting on 15th October and Planning Applications Committee on 16th.
- I hope to be at the Caius House youth club on the 27th.
Did you see Christ Church in the Guardian on 1st October? 
The picture is by photographer David Levene and is of Christ Church School’s vegetable garden. I don’t know why it found its way into the Guardian’s centre spread but it is a great picture of the children in the garden, which is behind a fence on Fownes Road, squeezed in between the estate and the main railway lines out of Clapham Junction. I was there when the school first took over this spare plot and it is just amazing to see the transformation they have made to what was an overgrown site. Well done, Christ Church.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere August Newsletter (# 64)
August highlights
- Let’s face it, I’ve just had the longest August holiday in quite a long time
and so there haven’t been many highlights outside of holidaying – though I did get to meet the Deputy Mayor of Sofia, capital of Bulgaria. However I thought I’d share a couple of thoughts about holidaying in the former Yugoslavia and in Bulgaria. First and most obviously the Adriatic coast, of both Montenegro and Croatia where I was, is spectacular. The scenery is staggering, the sea is warm (though I did read last week about Great White Shark attacks in the Adriatic – but after I got back, thank goodness), the wine is good and the food OK. I don’t want to bore with holiday snaps but here is just one of the Montenegro coast. - Rather more sobering is the realisation that “Yugoslavia” is, or was not that long ago – 1990s, a war zone. The war affected the whole of the Balkans but, as far as I could see, the centre of the war was Bosnia and there the picture is rather less rosy than in Croatia. The bomb sites in the
centre of town and the bullet and artillery shell holes in the buildings are very noticeable. In the tourist haven of Mostar, the tourist area itself is largely and well re-constructed but just a hundred metres from the tourist sites are empty, derelict houses, flats and businesses. Our B&B host on one night was weeping that she, a Muslim, married to a Catholic, was living happily with her neighbours in the 1980s and then found herself overnight as it were at war with her neighbours. How did it happen and why? She could not understand. - It’s perhaps not very clear in this picture but this shelled out building, an empty husk, is a stone’s throw from the tourist hotspots!
- It would be impossible here surely! But then, uncomfortably, temperatures do appear to have risen a little north of the border. We must ensure that bitter feelings are controlled.
- However, the ex-Yugoslavian countries seem fairly vibrant compared to Bulgaria, where the collapse of the old Soviet-style heavy industries seems to have left the country as a complete economic disaster area. Massive industrial complexes stand derelict and empty with much of the rural population left to flee to the capital, Sofia. The Black Sea coastal resorts and, no doubt, the ski resorts are doing well but much of Bulgaria looks like a country with big problems.
- Here in Latchmere, the Council’s Community Safety Team have installed a security camera in Anerley St to assist in issues concerning the theft of mopeds and dangerous driving of the vehicles in the area. Anerley Street is the short link between Dagnall Street and Battersea Park Road and I must say it is encouraging to see the police and the Council co-operating in trying to control the young villains who are largely responsible for this annoying and dangerous vandalism.
- I also heard the good news in August that the South West London Law Centre is going to re-locate in Falcon Road, next to the Mercy Foundation and near to the Prince’s Head. We have not had an appropriate location for the Law Centre for some years now but this new accommodation will be right at the heart of the action and well placed to serve the people who most need its services.
My Programme for September
- I am going to the Labour Party Conference in Manchester, starting on Sunday, 21st.
- The Planning Applications Committee will meet on 15th and the Education & Children’s Services Committee on the 17th.
- I will be at the AGM of GCSE Success, the self-help homework club, at York Gardens Library on 20th.
Did you know? Oh, dear I haven’t got anything to put here this month! Hopefully inspiration will come in time for next month!
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere August Newsletter (# 63)
- On 5th July I went, as every year, to the delightful Poyntz Road Triangle party. I have said it before but will repeat it again, “It is undoubtedly the best street party in the Borough”. Afterwards I dashed off to an Independence Day party. One of my Labour colleagues on the Council has an American wife and every year on the nearest Saturday to 4th July they have a party with spectacular fireworks. On the following Saturday I went to the WOW organised BBQ at Haven Lodge home in the Kambala Estate. Here is a slightly plump me (must do something about that) with WOW Chair Senia Dedic and fellow Councillor Wendy Speck.
- On 9th July councillors went on an organised coach trip around the Nine Elms development area. It certainly is impressive seeing all the buildings springing out of the ground at a rate of knots and perhaps most particularly the US Embassy. But as we were taken round and feted with wine and canapés (who paid for that? I don’t know), I was not the only councillor who thought that not much of this millionaires’ paradise is going to help us solve Wandsworth’s, or even London’s, housing crisis.
- It was, therefore, an ironic contrast on the 15th to go a seminar run in Battersea Rise’s St. Mark’s church on food banks. This phenomenon, pretty well unknown in London since the 1930s, has re-appeared since 2010. I have unfortunately forgotten the metrics but a very large number of food packages have been given to many, many poor people in the Borough with one of the worst affected areas being Latchmere. The three women who gave the presentation had analysed the main causes of the problems families were suffering and it will not surprise many of us to hear that they are largely a consequence of the benefit changes (I refuse to call them reforms) made by this Government – not least of course the Bedroom Tax, which only diehard Tories any longer defend.
- I said last month that the first meeting I had as Children’s Speaker was fascinating – the second was just as odd. It was a meeting of the so-called School Admissions Forum. It has 12 members, three of them councillors, two head teachers, a representative of the Church of England, a couple of parent governors and some non-parent governors. It doesn’t seem to take any decisions or have any votes. All it does, as far as I can see, is act as a consultative forum about primary school entry and the primary/secondary transfer. I find it very strange that this forum does not report to a public committee but what will be of more interest to most of you reading this is the information that 56.9% of children succeeded to get their first choice of secondary school and 94.1% one of their preferences.
- Rather more worrying for Latchmere is that, whilst Graveney School was the first choice for 701 children, Latchmere’s Battersea Park School(BPS) was the first choice for only 29. That does of course mean that everyone who chose Battersea Park succeeded in getting it whilst Graveney could only take 224 of the 701 who chose it. Obviously we hope that BPS does better but we will wait to see whether its new academy status will result in an improvement.
- At the primary school level Belleville and Honeywell were the most popular schools registering 185 and 178 first preferences respectively, whilst Latchmere’s primary schools had 71 first choices (Chesterton), 22 (Christchurch), 30 (Falconbrook) and 65 (Sacred Heart). The absurdity of Michael Gove’s Free Schools programme is well displayed, at least for me, by the Mosaic Jewish Free School, established in Roehampton, because there was allegedly a demand from the Jewish community. But only 5 parents in the Borough put it down as their first chance and so we, the people, have had to pay for a Jewish school that only 5 parents wanted! Indeed of the 30 children “going” to the Jewish school 14 had to be allocated to it, with many parents unhappy about that. Falconbrook also had nearly 40% of its pupils allocated to it rather than choosing it.
- But what is so strange to me is that the end results of this process are reported to the Office of the School Adjudicator, a branch of the civil service. What used to the responsibility of the local authority and of the local councillors, what you used to be able to complain to me about, has effectively been nationalised by Gove and his mates in Westminster.
- The first fully fledged Council Meeting of this newly elected Council was
on 16th July. It was a slightly emasculated affair, with everyone on best behaviour, because all the new councillors were making maiden speeches. It’s a funny debate as both sides allowed the new councillors to make their speeches in respectful silence. Now I know that most people do not like politicians having a go at each other but let me assure you that there can be little more boring than everyone agreeing with each other and nodding in approval. Having said that, I have to admit the standard of the maiden speeches was excellent – but a bit of heckling would have livened it up a bit! - On 22nd July I went to the launch of the Battersea Literary Festival. It was, let’s face it, a fun evening high above the Battersea Power Station site with plenty of wine and canapes – one of the few councillor perks I can think of. And on the Saturday, 25th July, I looked in at the Pennethorne Square “street party”. I was rather late but it seemed as though everyone there was having a good time, especially on the Bouncy Castle, well house.
My Programme for August
- I am going to spend most of the month in the Balkans. My partner is going to a Conference in Sofia, Bulgaria, and we will take the opportunity to tour some of the countries around – it should be interesting.
- The Planning Applications Committee will meet on 14th, but I will be away. I will, however, report on any significant plans, if there are any. The officers usually try to keep controversy well away from August.
Do you know about the National Anti-Vivisection Hospital?
Just outside Latchmere ward, on the corner of Albert Bridge Road and
opposite one of the Park’s entrances, are some small blocks of flats, one of them called Joan Bartlett House. But not that long ago it was the site of one of Battersea’s oldest landmarks, the Battersea General Hospital or more famously the Anti-Viv or National Anti-Vivisection Hospital. This hospital was founded at least in principle in 1896 by a Mrs Theodore Munroe, the Honorary Secretary of the Anti-Vivisection Society. The Society was against using animals in medical and scientific experiments, in experimental operations or in the testing of medicines.
In December, 1900, the site was bought for £7,000 and the hospital built and opened in 1902.It was a small charitable hospital, which was incorporated into the National Health Service and closed in 1972. The Anti-Viv, as older residents will have known it, was demolished in 1972. Here is a 1910s photograph, with Prince of Wales Drive to the left and Albert Bridge Road on the right.
Wot? No Fish!!
Went to Battersea Arts Centre (BAC) last Friday (18/7/14) to see Danny Braverman’s one-man show Wot? No Fish!! He and Nick Philippou are working together using this show as a springboard to re-form the Bread & Circuses Theatre Company.
It was a tour de force of story-telling, enhanced, not hindered, as it happens on Friday by a 30 minute break thanks to a rogue fire alarm – an incident which merely enhanced our admiration for Danny’s skill as a “village or clan” story-teller.
Braverman uses pictures drawn on the back of his weekly wage packets, by Abraham Solomons to tell a seemingly simple story of an East End Jewish family. Solomons presented the pictures along with the packets’ contents to his wife every week from the mid-twenties to the mid-fifties and in the course of it told a story of great charm and considerable complexity.
The end result was not a classic theatrical drama but a story, told with great skill and dramatic impact. It was the story of writer/performer Danny Braverman’s own family, and felt like an intimate family history told by an old friend. His quiet conversational voice emphasised the tenderness and warmth of that family.
The pictures were back projected on to a screen, which was the stage back-drop, and were part of a very cleverly constructed show. On the way we explored the nature of Jewish and ethnic identity, of poverty and wealth in society and of family love and togetherness. There were bad times. We see the pain that the couple have faced during their lives together, particularly when an autistic son is institutionalised. That week’s picture showed the middle-aged couple with a wall between them – very poignant and very simple.
The script includes an interesting take on the nature of history: not a simple line, nor regular cycles; more like a spiral of change but touching upon older contact points as it spirals. Indeed the programme notes claim that the show “is the helix as a metaphor for history”.
The performance ends brilliantly, as the final picture is animated: the couple walk up the hill together, with birdsong on the sound-track. On the verge of being schmaltzy but the warmth and humanity triumphs over that unworthy thought. If you get a chance to see it – do NOT miss it.
MH17 – A one-off disaster or an inevitable by-product of modern warfare?
Heard of Iranian Air Lines flight 655? It was a regular daily flight from the Iranian town of Bandar Abbas to Dubai, which on 3rd July 1988 had 290 on board, though maybe significantly only 39 non-Iranians. It was brought down with all 279 passengers and crew killed by a US fired missile from USS Vincennes. Captain Will Rogers III, a career naval officer, was in command of the Vincennes. He was awarded the Congressional Legion of Merit.
Vincennes was a guided missile destroyer of the US navy, whose crew failed to distinguish between a civilian airliner and an expected Iranian attack force. However, a fellow senior officer in the Gulf hinted that having such a gung-ho commander in the field was at the minimum a risk. Despite the “disaster” a couple of years later Rogers was promoted to be commander of the US Naval Tactical Training Group responsible for training officers in handling combat situations.
The United States and President Reagan got away with this incident amazingly scot-free in terms of worldwide condemnation or criticism. In most people’s language this was a war crime and although considerable compensation was paid, as far as I know the US has never apologised. At the UN, the then Vice-President George Bush argued that it had been an accident of war.
And yet in all the comments on the missile attack on MH17, I have not seen a reference to the Vincennes incident. Comparisons have been made with the Soviet destruction of Korean Airlines KAL007 with the loss of 269 lives off Sakhalin in 1983 and the Ukrainian downing of Siberian Airlines flight 1812 in 2001, with the loss of 88 lives, but not the Vincennes. I rather suspect that says something about the soft power of the US as opposed to the “soft (power) weakness” of Russia.
These four “military incidents” alone have claimed 945 civilian lives over the last 26 years. I don’t know how many have died in air crashes, where the military have not been involved, but I wouldn’t mind betting that military incidents are the single most important cause of aircraft disasters. Perhaps we should spend as much time on how to avoid such fatalities as the designers and engineers spend on improving aircraft safety and performance – no flights within 1000 miles of combat zones, higher levels of locking devices on missiles, passenger involvement in flight path choices?
The Tories face a disaster called Europe
There will always be a right of centre party – of course – but every now and then the Tory Party faces a disaster, a cataclysmic event from which it takes them 10 or 20 years to recover. This happens when long-cherished immovable beliefs and policies come into conflict with financial, political or economic reality.
The examples that come to mind are the 1846 Repeal of the Corn Laws and the 1902 struggle over Imperial tariffs – both in effect about trade policy and import tariffs. In 1846 the interests of the English aristocracy and their farming businesses were beginning to come into conflict with those of the new industrial and commercial elite of Victorian Britain. The catalyst for the 1846 Repeal of the Corn Laws was the Irish Famine. Five years of one of the worst famines in recorded history (the Irish population fell from over 8 million to 6.5 million, which is what it still is to this day) forced Sir Robert Peel to repeal the protectionist Corn Laws.
The party split and it was not until one of the rebels opposed to Peel, Benjamin Disraeli, managed to make the Tories relevant to the new might of British Imperialism with his “one nation” Toryism that they again achieved a parliamentary victory. Disraeli’s win in 1874 was their first since 1841.
Half a century later in the early 1900s the Tory party once again tore itself apart over trade protectionism. This time it was fear of the new growing industrial might of Germany and the USA, which posed the political problem. Joseph Chamberlain resigned from the Government in 1903 to lead a campaign for Imperial Preference levies in opposition to the free trade policies pursued by Prime Minister, Balfour. Chamberlain thought that putting a tariff round the Empire would protect British trade, particularly in India, Canada and Australia, from these aggressive, rising competitors. Balfour wished to maintain the free trade essentially created by the 1846 Repeal Act.
The dispute over free trade or protectionism resulted in big victories for the Liberal Party in the 1906 and 1911 elections. Once again it was 20 years later in the totally different post-WW1 1920s before the Tory Party resumed its “normal” role as the party of Government.
And now in 2014-17 I think we face a similar prospect of Tory division and defeat over trade policies, where once again cherished Tory party notions come into conflict with the political realities. This time the Tory notion is the nostalgia for the UK as a great power and our collective failure even today to come to terms with the truth – that we are an important European nation, dependent upon our relationship with the rest of the continent. The external reality, which is posing the issue so starkly, is the EU.
David Cameron, with his tactics over the Juncker/European Commissioner vote, has made himself uniquely unpopular in Europe and put himself into a truly awful negotiating position for the post-Election “reform” of the EU. As a result it is almost inconceivable that he could win terms from European politicians, which would be remotely acceptable to a large number of Tory MPs or with anyone with UKIP tendencies.
Cameron, therefore, now faces a major dilemma over the 2017 Referendum vote. It’s almost inconceivable that Britain’s industrial and commercial elite would accept or fund a Government and party, which wanted to opt out of the EU, but it also beggars belief that the current Tory party would support a pro-EU campaign. Where would that leave Cameron – dependent upon Labour votes?
There is, of course, one way out for Cameron and that would be to lose the May, 2015, General Election. But assuming that is not his plan then his leadership seems to be leading the Tory Party inexorably into a cul-de-sac and another split over trade policy, with the right wing eventually merging with UKIP and becoming a Tory Party devoid of any real electoral prospects for a dozen years or more. Meanwhile do the pro-EU Tories hitch themselves to the by-then surely divided Liberal/Democratic party? It is an intriguing prospect and holds out great prospects for Labour.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere July Newsletter (# 62)
June highlights
- The first month of a new Council was an odd experience for me on several counts! For starters, it is the first time since 1971 (Yes, 1971!) when I haven’t been in some kind of leadership role either in office or in opposition during the first month of the new Council– so I only hear second-hand what has being decided! Secondly, the Labour leadership, in its wisdom, have decided to give me the lead role on the Education and Children’s Services Committee – schools and school children but also quite a lot more, and a new experience for me. I continue to be on the Planning Applications Committee.
- Under financial pressures from the Government, the Council has decided that the Council and most Committees are to meet only 4 times a year instead of 6 and that there should be fewer councillors on each committee. This might seem like sensible financial efficiencies to those of you with a very business-related background but to me it seems like dangerous under-mining of the democratic process. I find it difficult to see just how councillors can build up a level of expertise and common understanding – call it teamwork if you will – on the basis of meeting and talking to each other so infrequently. Why does that matter? Well in my mind I think that is a sure-fire recipe for leaving the paid officers in charge and removing the elected members, and in the end, you the electorate, out of the process. It also will result, I think, in further centralisation of the already over-centralised British governmental system. Officers will never, ever be able to resist the threats and bullying tactics that Governments, Labour as well as Tory and Coalition, use on local authorities. Not that we councillors always did but at least we stood a fighting chance! What does that mean for me? Well I will do my best to be a voice for a more democratic and slightly more rebellious (perhaps “questioning” would be a better word) role for councillors.
- My first meeting as Children’s Speaker was fascinating. It was a meeting of the so-called Academies and Free School Commission. “What on earth is that?”, I can hear you cry – well a jolly good question. The Commission is a Wandsworth Council special, a Tory joke, a bureaucratic piece of hypocrisy and/or a jolly good idea – take your pick.
- Let me try and explain. Michael Gove came into Government with a more or less explicit plan to get rid of local education authorities (LEAs) – he doesn’t want local councillors involved in running schools. His argument is let’s leave running the schools to the Heads (oh, and of course, Michael Gove).To achieve his objective Gove has forced schools to become academies, as he is currently doing with Battersea Park School which is due to become a Harris (Carpet and also Tory funding grandee) Academy; he has also ruled that all new schools have to be either so-called Free Schools or Academies – as in the Jewish Mosaic school set-up in Putney.
- However Wandsworth Council actually thinks it is doing quite a good job as an LEA and also doesn’t want one of its main functions stripped from it. So it has appointed this Commission, in order to advise the Government on which organisations should be allowed to run schools and/or start up new ones.
- Funnily enough, I think it probably does quite a good job and, by the way, it is a model being recommended by Government for other LEAs to follow, despite it being set up precisely to thwart the Government’s objective of keeping councillors out of the process. The ironies are endless! We had Church of England representatives at the Commission arguing that they were NOT at all like faith schools – they don’t want to be caught up in the backlash against Muslim faith schools which is now embroiling Birmingham. The Commission is chaired by a Baroness Perry, a stalwart of the education establishment who says on Google that “My biggest mistake was underestimating how awful the Inner London Education Authority could be,” but interestingly enough never seems to have been elected to anything in her quango-studded life. She actually didn’t get the irony about the Church of England.
- Unfortunately, from the Tories point of view, they have to have a minority party member on this commission. I am not usually as political as this in my newsletter but the Commission is an absolutely fantastic example of making decision-making the province of the great and the good, and of course by definition Tory, and keeping everyone else out of it
- My second meeting was a far less contentious visit to Allfarthing School– don’t know what the kids made of it but I enjoyed it! Though I do wonder a bit what these visits of supposed bigwigs actually accomplishes – an interesting occasion for us (there were some half a dozen councillors) but to what end? Well, one thing that strikes a relative newcomer to the world of primary schools is just how female dominated they are. Is this one reason why boys are falling further and further behind girls in school performance and if so what can we do about it?
- As for the Education and Children’s Services Overview and Scrutiny Committee itself on 25th June, I hardly know what to say. There was a presentation from young people on the work of the Youth Council in Wandsworth. It was all very nice and interesting and said a lot about what the Youth Council do but I am not at all clear that it had anything to do with the meat of local politics. Another interesting paper was one about the re-tendering out of the Leaving Care Services. This is a really important service, which is responsible for mentoring, almost parenting, children in care when at the age of 16 or so they have to move out of Council care and into the wide world as independent people. For those of us with a well parented background, the thought of being out on your own at the age of 16 seems horrifying, or perhaps terrifying. So it really is an important service but there doesn’t seem anything for councillors to decide about it, other than to proceed with the tendering! It seemed to me important to ensure that the service would not be threatened by the tendering process – but that was all.
- On the 17th June there was the Planning Applications Committee. There were lots of applications but none of them very significant except for the three Council applications for the expansion of Albemarle, Hillbrook and Allfarthing primary schools and another for the demolition of the Battersea Power Station’s Pumping Station. The primary school expansions are a sign of the population explosion happening in the Borough and most particularly in the central and western parts. It is ironic that the Council closed some dozen schools and sold off the sites in the late 1990s and early 2000s and is now desperately trying to expand many of the ones that remain.

- As for the Pumping Station, there was quite a campaign to refuse this application to demolish the station with many people confusing its demolition with concerns about the demolition of the Power Station. In my view the campaigners were deliberately trying to confuse – surely there cannot be too many people concerned about a building that is almost totally unknown to Battersea residents and whose continuing existence, the developers claim, was merely delaying the day when the Power Station is at last re-opened.
- By the way, the south west chimney of the Power Station will be demolished in the next few months with re-building said to be completed by 2016, by which time work will have started on the other three chimneys.
- On a personal level, I and partner, Penny, went to Spain for a week with
the grandchildren and their parents. The excuse was a friend’s 60th birthday party in a small Spanish town called Jesus Pobre, which also had its annual fiesta. Plenty of bulls (not one killed – Spain is changing), flamenco, Rioja and rather tragically for our hosts Spain’s 5-1 defeat to Holland in the World Cup! Here is Scarlett, with Penny and me! 
- And a week later, I went to the Lake District to scatter the ashes of my old friend and fellow Labour councillor Peter Ackhurst from the top of Bowfell. The picture gives an idea of the beauty of the Lake District for those who don’t know it.
- And on the last day of June, ex-Council Leader Edward Lister, now Deputy Mayor of London, announced the plan to introduce a Formula-E race in Battersea Park in the summer of 2015. Formula-E is motoring racing’s response to criticism of Formula 1 as a non-green sport, designed to burn up more carbon fuels in 2 hours than any other sport. Formula-E, as I understand it, would focus on electronic-powered racing cars and might just become the model of motor racing in the 21st century. If successful it would presumably be the first of many annual grand prix events and would bring massive crowds to Battersea Park and possibly disturb/ruin Battersea Park for the best part of a whole summer month. Just what do you think we should do in response – welcome the idea with open arms or resist the plan to the end?
My Programme for July
- On 2nd July I have an Education and Standards Group, which investigates school performance – on this occasion Allfarthing School and Latchmere’s own Sacred Heart Primary School.
- July is always the height of the summer social scene. One of my favourite parties is the Knowsley Street Triangle party on Saturday, 5th July. Then on 10th there is the Battersea Society summer social in the grounds at St. Mary’s – always a splendid occasion – if the weather is good. And on 12th Women of Wandsworth (WoW) are having a BBQ for the elderly at Haven Lodge.
- On the 16th there will be the first Meeting of the new Council. This is always an interesting occasion as one weighs up the strengths and weaknesses of the new councillors but is, of course, almost unknown to you the electorate. If any of you fancy coming then do get in touch with me and I will ensure that you get a tour of the Council Chamber and a ring side seat at a Council Meeting.
- The Planning Applications Committee, which will meet on 17th.
Do you know about Ron Elam’s Battersea photo collection?
My friend Ron Elam has been collecting photographs and postcards of Battersea for the best part of 40 years! He has something in the range of 40,000 of them stored in a large shed in his back garden. He used to run a market stall, occasionally in Northcote Road and more frequently in Bellevue Road. Well he has now published a book “Battersea Through Time”, with his colleague Simon McNeill-Ritchie, and included in it many photographs from the past but with every picture from the past alongside its modern equivalent.
Everywhere from Clapham Junction to Lavender Hill, Nine Elms and Battersea Park is featured.
Here is a sample from the east end of Battersea Park Road in 1920 and today.![batt pk rd 2014[1]](https://tonybelton.blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/batt-pk-rd-20141.jpg?w=342&h=215)
![batt pk rd 1920[1]](https://tonybelton.blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/batt-pk-rd-19201.jpg?w=351&h=215)
The book is priced at £14.99 but for the next month it can be obtained for £12 if you mention the Wandsworth Guardian by contacting Mr Elam on 0208 874 8544 or by emailing ron@localyesterdays.demon.co.uk.
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere June Newsletter (# 61)
May highlights
1. May was, as you have probably guessed, totally dominated (for me) by the Borough Elections. For the record, as I assume that many of you will not know the details, the votes were: Tony Belton 2172: Wendy Speck 1933: Simon Hogg 1899: William Plummer (Tory) 1218: Rose Sintim (Tory) 1203: Rosemary Summerfield (Tory) 1096: Peter Mason (Green) 508: Angela Tinkler (UKIP) 327: Hollie Voyce (Lib/Dem) 221: Robert Edwards (TU & Socialist Coalition) 106
This amounted to an average swing to the three of us, Wendy, Simon and me, of 5%, for which many thanks to t
hose of you who voted for one, two or all three of us. Indeed to anyone who voted – Great, but I am afraid that the turnout was only 34.93% so two out of three Latchmere residents did NOT vote! (This picture of us on the platform was at about 2 a.m. on the Friday morning after an election day when we were up and around the polling stations as early as 7 am on the Thursday – it was a long day).
2. In the Borough as a whole the Tory party comfortably retained control by 41 to 19 councillors, but they did lose six Council seats and Labour gained six. Other interesting facts about the election in Wandsworth included a) every single Green Party candidate came third after the two “main” parties and defeated the Lib/Dems in every ward, b) there was a 5/6% swing to the two main parties from all the other candidates, who included Green, UKIP, Lib/Dem, Independents, Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition and the Communist Party of Britain and c) that UKIP really did not figure anywhere at all in the Borough (or indeed anywhere in Inner London). The other notable feature of election night was the rise of women. Of the six Labour gains five were women and so now of the 19 Labour councillors 10 are women. On the Tory side there are 26 men and 15 women, with the result that we have 25 female councillors as opposed to 35 men.
3. I also went to a few Hustings meetings, all of which had a respectable sized audience – maybe 50 or 60 residents. One of the most dramatic was in Wandsworth, where the UKIP speaker had a stroke just as he was starting to speak. We later heard that, after spending a night in hospital, he went home and has recovered well.
4. A quick update on the Mayoral Bike stations. I continue to monitor the usage of all the Bike stations and there is no doubt that usage continues to grow quite rapidly. The weather of course helps so the bikes are being used about three times as much as when they were first installed in January. I am happy to give individual figures if anyone is interested but, until usage shows something new, I think I will leave it at that.
My Programme for June
1. Well, imagine you were at work and overnight you had a 50% turnover of staff. There would be all kinds of roles to sort out and jobs to arrange. So I guess that most of June I will be getting to know new people and sort out new roles. One new job for me is that I am going to take on the lead role on the Labour side on Children’s Services, all about schools and social services. That is a completely new job for me and so I have to teach myself about all the issues involved!
2. I am, however, continuing to be the Labour lead on the Planning Applications Committee, which will meet on 17th. And, of course, I will continue to be interested in the whole Latchmere regeneration project. Meanwhile Simon Hogg is taking over my current job as Labour lead on Housing and Wendy Speck is moving to Strategic Planning.
3. On 1st June I led a “History Walk”, partly in Latchmere, for Wandsworth’s Heritage Festival. This is becoming an annual feature and would interest, I like to think, anyone interested in local history. Let me know if that sounds interesting to you and I will put you down on the list for next year! A part of the walk includes the following
Did you know that?
The last time a Prime Minister took part in a duel, it took place in Battersea Fields
– a marshy area which is now Battersea Park. The Prime Minister was the Duke of Wellington, popularly known as the “Iron Duke”. He had been the British hero, along with Nelson, in the Napoleonic Wars and was in command at Waterloo, when Britain and its allies finally defeated Napoleon.
He got the sobriquet, Iron Duke, by being a hard disciplinarian, but a popular general. One of his major dislikes was duelling. He forbad it in the army because he was, not unreasonably, concerned that, if his officers had to die, they should die facing the French and not in silly duels.
So imagine the publicity that he got in London’s morning papers when they discovered that the Prime Minister had fought a duel across the river in the rather infamous Battersea Fields. His opponent was the Earl of Winchilsea, who, when it came down to it, shot into the air, leaving Wellington to fire his pistol into the ground.
This was in 1829 but how did the Prime Minister, a Duke, and an Earl come to be fighting a duel in the first place. It wasn’t about a woman or gambling debts or a casual slight but about politics. Wellington had decided to repeal anti-Catholic legislation, which had been imposed during and after the Civil War, and Winchilsea, who was an ardent Protestant accused Wellington of “selling” Protestantism short.
In fact Wandsworth, being near to Westminster but safely on the “wrong side of the river” was the scene of one or two famous duels between “top people” in the early nineteenth century. As for me, I am distinctly pleased that nowadays we use ballots and no longer bullets!
Councillor Tony Belton’s Latchmere May Newsletter (# 60)
2010-14 highlights 1. I guess to most this May is much like any other May. Nice and sunny, we hope, very spring-like – good to be alive territory. But for some of us, including me, it is a bit different. This is the last month of the 2010-14 Council and, one never knows, possibly my last month as a councillor – it all depends upon you on election day, 22nd May. 2. So, I thought this month I would highlight my pick of the most important mome
nts of 2010-14. I have to start, of course, with the early announcement after the 2010 Borough Election that the Tories planned to close York Gardens Library. Others will have other memories but I recall a discussion between Simon Hogg, Wendy Speck (my fellow councillors) and I when we decided that we had to call a public meeting at the library to fight the closure. Wendy and Simon had only been councillors for a couple of months so we decided that I had to Chair the meeting, which I was more than glad to do and which I am doing here. 3. In the November, 2010, issue of this newsletter I wrote “And indeed we did not have to wait long (for Tory Council cuts), since that very day (6th November, 2010) we received early notice of the Council’s intention to close York Gardens Library. The local community was quick to campaign against this closure with petitions and a public meeting at the Library on Sunday, 5 December, at 2 pm. Do come if you can but if not please write to Cllr Lister (the then Leader of the Council), Wandsworth Town Hall, to protest at the closure of the library, which is in the poorest and most deprived area in the Borough.” 4. In the December issue I went on to write that, “It was a very successful meeting in that 130 people were th
ere. There were excellent contributions from many local residents and between us we wrote maybe 50 letters objecting to the proposal. We have also collected about 2,000 signatures on petitions. A few Conservative councillors attended but they kept very quiet. However, I think that the meeting had quite an impact on the Council and I sense that the Council is now trying very hard to come up with a compromise which saves the library and so it should. The Council’s own papers show that a higher proportions of children use the library for homework than in any other library in the Borough. Given the extent of over-crowding in Latchmere we can all guess why that would be but it demonstrates just how important the library is to Latchmere.” 5. As we all now know the campaign was a great success and the library, now often just called YGL, is run by a local management committee on behalf of the local community. My colleague Wendy Speck is a member of the Management team. By the way there had been a long-running battle between the Tory Council and the local community over the library. The first campaign to save, what was then, the Winstanley Children’s Library was fought in 1981! The Community defended it then just as it did 30 years later in 2011.
6. The main event of 2011, I hesitate to call it a highlight, was of course the riots that took place across London and in Clapham Junction on 6th August, 2011. I produced my one and only special edition of this newsletter to mark the occasion. Here are a couple of the photographs that I took the day after.
7. It was, of course, a terrible day and had a profound effect, of which more later. One immediate result was that it put me in the front-line against the eviction of innocent Council tenants. The news centred on one lady and her 8 year-old daughter, who was going to be evicted because her 17 year old son was arrested in Clapham Junction. I was not, of course, defending criminal activity, but when the courts eventually imposed a one year prison sentence on the rather silly young man it seemed a bit extreme (to me and to many others) to evict the mother and the totally innocent 8 year-old. I suspect not too many people would be happy to have their security of tenure totally in the hands of their 17 year-old sons! In the end the Council backed down and after a bad 6 months inside young Daniel has become a very nice, caring young man. 8. I was interviewed on this case by many foreign newspapers and TV channels, especially in Spain, France and French Canada. They really found it very difficult to believe that here, in the UK, we could think of evicting whole families because of the “criminality” of one member of the family. I was also proud of the speech I made in Council on the issue, which if you are really interested you can see at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQukL9XxxYk. I am speaking between 0.40 and 11 minutes 26 of the video! 9. The biggest news of 2012, as I wrote in March of that year, “was the Council’s decision to “spend” £100 million on Latchmere and Roehampton wards …at the same time (as) the Big Lottery has also allocated a separate £1 million to Latchmere.” The Council said it was not, of course, a response to the riots, indeed it was claimed to be despite the riots but we can all apply a pinch of salt to that lie/propaganda. What might surprise some is that now 2 years later we do not appear to be very much closer to action on the ground in the so-called estate regeneration. I suspect, however, that appearances are deceptive and that after the election there will be fairly rapid moves. I hope the vast majority of the residents will be happy with the plan but many are aware that some of the residents of the smaller Winstanley Estate blocks are not at all keen on possible demolition.. 10. The Big Lottery grant is also still going through a planning process. There have been several successful events organised in York Gardens and the Wilditch, but I sense a little frustration amongst those of us involved in the planning group that we have not yet found the “Great idea”, which will make our Big Local something unique.
11. My highlights of 2013 were very personal! First there was the trip that we three Latchmere councillors, Wendy Speck, Simon Hogg and myself, made to Palestine in February, which as I said at the time had nothing to do with Latchmere, Battersea or Wandsworth, but it was certainly packed with interest. Here is a picture of the three of us with a banner given to us by the Mayor of Hebron. (As I said then, before any cynics out there think otherwise, it was all paid for out of our own pockets and had nothing to do with the Council!). The trip did give me a chance to take my picture
of the year, and here it is – a cactus caught by the flash-light in the Judean desert at sunset, high above Bethlehem – and, oh my, was it cold. So cold in fact, I got shingles on this trip and very painful and unpleasant it was too, but at least it went after 3 months! Worse in September when I, and my partner,
went on a cycling tour of Holland, our bikes were stolen in Amsterdam and I got streptococcal G poisoning in my left knee, after what seemed at the time a rather slight bump. (I am in the centre of this picture in Delft) That resulted in me spending a couple of weeks in St. George’s, feeling as though I was at death’s door! It made the shingles pain seem minor! So to use the Queen’s description of 1992 (the year of the great fire at Windsor Castle) as her “annus horribilis” then I would say the same about 2013! 12. And so to 2014. Well, of course, the major highlight will be the May 22nd election – or at least I hope it will be but to get back to the more day-to-day, I do want to mention a couple of other things. 13. The March figures for use of the Bike docking stations have been very encouraging. No doubt the great spring weather made a difference but use of the bikes went up 83% in March, with individual increases ranging from over 100% in Grant Road to only 67% in Fawcett Close – encouraging but there are still some with only small levels of usage. (Oh, I have been on them twice in the last few weeks!) 14. Many of you will not have seen the 4th May copy of the Observer. In the main section of the paper a full page 19 article is about Providence House Youth Club, which is celebrating its 50th anniversary with a Saturday 10th May party. The success of the Club was originally down to the pioneering work of Elizabeth Braund, who died in 2013 and who I featured in this newsletter (June, 2013), but I want to praise Robert Musgrave, the volunteer youth worker, who has been totally committed to the Club for since going there first in 1973. 15. The Planning Applications Committee on the 14th April had a massively, stupid 530 page agenda, with lots of very chunky applications although not affecting Latchmere directly. The largest two were about the Power Sta
tion site and Market Towers at Vauxhall, just inside the Borough boundary. I don’t know whether you know it but Vauxhall is just about to become a mini-Manhattan, but I am afraid that it is a development aimed solely at the mega-rich, international business world and will have very little to do with local residents! 16. Finally, it has been a hopeless ambition of mine to get the station named, as it should be Battersea Junction and not, Clapham Junction. If anyone doubts me then look at the boundaries of Battersea parish, look at where Battersea District Reference Library and where Battersea Town Hall (now the arts centre) are. Well I may not have succeeded in getting it renamed but after many years of trying here am I and Wendy Speck celebrating the strapline, Clapham Junction, the Heart of Battersea. My Programme for May 1. Of course there is, as ever, there will be the Planning Applications Committee on the 8th, preceded on the 7th by the final Council Meeting of this four-yearterm.. However, for me and my colleagues there will simply be more and more election campaigning. So give us a wave if you see us about – it’s just part of the process! Oh, and if you swear and curse at having your TV viewing disturbed and exclaim that we are all the same, oh and in it only for the money, just give a thought: “Would you rather live in a country where the only way to change a government was by war or revolution?” Just what do you know about war-time, Battersea? A couple of weeks ago, I was canvassing a couple of elderly ladies
on the Winstanley Estate, who told me about the area before the estate was built and particularly of their memories of the war-time bombing. And although I covered this a couple of months ago I thought it worth reminding you of what a pounding Battersea got during the war. The ladies remembered in particular Speke and Livingstone Roads, which I gather stood more or less where John Parker Square is today. And although I haven’t got a photograph of what happened when they were hit by a V1 here is another of Winston Churchill visiting Nine Elms after a particularly savage attack. PS I just wondered whether the photographer of Christ Church, in last month’s edition was John Archer, the first black mayor? He had a photographer’s business in Battersea Park Road at the time of that picture. But I don’t know. “Promoted and published by Sean Lawless on behalf of Tony Belton, Simon Hogg & Wendy Speck, all at 177 Lavender Hill, Battersea, SW11 5TE”


