Archive | March 2012
March 30, 2012  

My Latchmere April Newsletter (# 36)

March highlights

  1.   Last month, I reported that the Council had decided to “spend” £100 million on Latchmere and Roehampton wards, and that the Big Lottery has also allocated a separate £1 million to Latchmere. Since then I have set up a meeting on 29th March with the Big Lottery “facilitator”, Helen Garforth – officially the “Big Local Representative”, when she will be able to meet many local interest groups, such as resident associations, youth groups, women’s groups, councillors and town hall officers. Helen will tell us what the Lottery Fund is prepared to grant fund and how we go about putting bids together.
  2. Meanwhile we await developments on the Council’s plans for its £100 million infrastructure development, though many who live in the Grant Road, Plough Road, York Road and Falcon Road rectangle will by now have seen the Council’s first publicity flyer on the issue.
  3. STOP PRESS. An hour and a half before the 29th March meeting, there was a shooting in Plough Road. One young man was taken to hospital and, it is said, two others were seen “escaping” on a motor bike. This is not the place to talk about the shooting (I am sure the local Guardian and the police will have things to say about it), but it did mean that we had to move the meeting to Thames School. It also rather dramatically reminded us of some of the issues that need to be tackled in Latchmere.
  4. The meeting itself was an early launch of what the Big Lottery Fund is trying to do with 150 projects nation-wide, £1million a time, aimed at helping isolated or more deprived communities to re-generate themselves – far too early though to give anything other than superficial comments. We did, however, learn the boundaries of the area concerned. It was Latchmere ward from the Eltringham School site to Culvert Road, and a small part of St. Mary Park, covering Badric Court and the very bottom end of Battersea High Street.
  5.   The Planning Applications Committee met twice in March on the 5th and 15th. On the 5th there were very large developments approved; one in the Nine Elms area, amounting to 1800 flats, plus associated retail and office developments. What with the notification of further very large developments on and around the Sainsbury’s store, Vauxhall and Nine Elms stand to be transformed into a mini-Manhattan over the next few years. I must admit to having my fears about this. First, I just can’t see where all the business is going to come from for the scale of retail development that is envisaged – what with us all increasingly shopping online. I am not at all sure that it will work. Secondly I haven’t seen much evidence of these massive developments adding much to the community. In many of the existing estates such as the one on Chelsea Bridge Approach, the number of residences that are empty for many weeks of the year is scandalous – such a lot of them seem to be owned by foreign companies wanting a London pad for the occasional convenience of their visiting senior staff.
  6.   The 15th March Planning Applications Committee had a lot of much smaller developments, though the approval of the Council’s plans to put 139 flats on to the Eltringham School site was of major interest (and concern) to many Latchmere residents, some of whom were at the Committee. Quite a few councillors expressed disappointment that the design was not very distinguished and that at 9 storeys, at the highest, it was just a bit over-sized, but unfortunately only I and one other councillor voted against it. There was also an approval for an extension in Rowditch Lane which has caused some controversy, with me asking some questions of the Town Hall on behalf of neighbours.
  7.   As everyone knows the Government is cutting back on many forms of benefit as from 1st April. Housing and Children’s benefits are perhaps the best known but some of the implications just might surprise you, as I discovered on 13th March, when I was asked to join the residents of the Dovedale Cottage alms-houses in a meeting they had with their managers – the Pathway Trust – about their rents and management charges. (Dovedale Cottages are at the corner of Battersea Park Road and Latchmere Road and are pictured here).
  8. The charging system is complicated but taken in the round the end result is a rent increase of 20%+. Some of this is down to a straight rent increase but other items include the Council withdrawing a financial support programme for pensioners. Despite writing to the Pathway Chief Executive I am rather afraid that I will not be able to prevent the increase and the sufferers will be the 20-30 residents nearly all of whom are pensioners and not very well off.
  9.   On a personal note, I went to visit my Aunt Nen in rural Essex on 16th March. So what? I hear you say, except that she is 101, as bright as a button and is the younger of the two of us in this photograph! Her family bought her a flight in a glider for her 90th birthday – don’t think she did anything quite so thrilling a couple of years ago (she is actually nearly 102) but she did have a great 100th birthday party – and of course has the telegram to prove it.
  10.   On the 3rd and 4th, I went to Dieppe for the week-end. Why Dieppe? Well it isn’t Calais or Boulogne and it is an easy trip from Clapham Junction to Newhaven and then on the ferry. One problem though is that since they have abandoned the old rail ferries, instead of docking by the station, and essentially in the centre of town, you get left a mile out of town and with no services – OK for us but not what you’d fancy burdened with luggage and/or disability. And on the way back, whilst we were watching France vs Ireland on the box, our taxi failed to turn up and we ended up running and, would you believe it, hitching back to the ferry, which we almost leapt on as she sailed!
  11. But one thing they do have organised very well is their public swimming pool. Built right on the beach it has spectacular play pools and Jacuzzis and a 50 metre open-air salt-water heated pool. If you ever go, do remember to take your trunks!
  12. Here is a picture of our favourite bar in the old town, which has been much bashed about in the Second World War (though we, English, ably assisted by the Dutch, burnt it down in 1694 when we wanted to curb Louis XIV’s ambitions).
  13.   At 4 pm on 31st March I am going to a one man concert given by the Chair of the Battersea Labour Party, Will Martindale. I am really looking forward to that as he plays the piano and the cello; he plays classical and jazz. He is doing it as a charity event for Epilepsy Action at St. Nectarios Church in Wycliffe Road. If anyone wants to come along I would be delighted to introduce you.
  14.   There was a by-election in Southfields on 29th March. There was a pretty dramatic swing to Labour but the end result was a Tory victory with a 340 majority.

My Programme for April

  1. You will be surprised about just how early this newsletter is. That is because I am off on Sunday for two weeks and my first real holiday for some years. I will talk about it next month.
  2. I have Finance & Corporate Resources Committee on 17th April.
  3. The Planning Applications Committee meets on 18th April.
  4. And of course every councillor will be busy pestering you for your vote in the Mayoral Elections on May 3rd. I wont use this newsletter as an electioneering tool – I promised not to when I started it. But if anyone wants help with getting a postal vote or a lift to the polling station then let me, or one of my colleagues, know. Actually as I am away it better be them on wspeck@wansdworth.gov.uk or shogg@wandsworth.gov.uk.

What do you think?

At the beginning of this newsletter I said that the Big Lottery was going to spend £1million over 10 years on funding community facilities in Latchmere and a small part of St. Mary Park. That works out at £100,000 each year. We need good ideas for what to do with it. We could for example argue that £10,000 should go on funding York Gardens Library or £5,000 on landscaping near Chesterton House. But what the Big Lottery Trust wants is our ideas. Do send me your thoughts and let’s make sure we make the best possible use of this £1million. I said all that last month but will continue repeating it for a bit until we get some ideas.

What about a Latchmere Olympics in York Gardens? An afternoon of events for toddlers to grandparents?

March 30, 2012  

Mayors – their constitutional position

I have consistently opposed the Heseltine/Blair concept of Mayors, though I have to accept that they look like becoming a permanent part of the British political landscape. But last week-end I was trying to describe the London Mayoral set-up to an American friend, who lives in New York. He asked me about the control exercised upon the Mayor by the Assembly and I must admit that I found it rather difficult.

I explained to him that if 66% of the Assembly members objected they could defeat his budget, but apart from that I was not too sure that the members could do much except overview and scrutinise. Conversations over the years with Livingstone, Sir Robin Wales (Newham) and Edward Lister (Deputy London Mayor) confirm my general impression. They all began by opposing the Mayoral concept (though I am not absolutely sure of that with Wales) but having become Mayor or Deputy they are now so enchanted with their unlimited powers, not just of advocacy but also of executive action, that they are advocates for not only more Mayors but also more powers to be given to them.

My New Yorker friend was scandalised. “You mean once elected these guys are in total control, and unencumbered by any elected assembly? That could never happen in the States – New York’s Mayor is answerable to his admittedly rather small (my italicised words) Council” he exclaimed. Lord Hailsham’s elective dictatorship has become a reality.

I have always thought that the risks we are taking, throwing away the checks and balances implicit, and indeed explicit, in our Council and Leader structure were pretty huge. We are set on the gamble now! I await the coming cronyism, scandals and bad governance with some sorrow for what, all in all, was a pretty good form of local government, once the envy of the world.

March 21, 2012  

Interns – a necessary part of the new economy: good training or genteel slavery?

A recent ad from Wandsworth Council asked for trainee social workers to work for free, selling the idea as good for their CV. It sparked some debate in Labour councillor circles and I am interested in where you stand on the issue. We all know of sites like Work4MP where the expectation is frequently that the “job” you get will be an expenses only internship. Is this a scandal, which all MPs should avoid like the plague or is it a useful source of on the job training?

Starting from the perspective of a 1960s graduate, the idea of unpaid work training appears outrageous. The fact that it might be acceptable today shows just how we have allowed the markets to over-ride our ability to organise society. It also is an expression of the regrettable powerlessness of the trade union movement. One inevitably asks whether there is any limit to the power of the market – suppose market forces and a combination of globalisation and automation results in demand for labour being on a permanently downward trend – are we going to see this generation go from being 20 year old interns to 30 and 40 year old interns?

However, younger colleagues argue that there is nothing wrong with internships, especially when otherwise we would have to pay the bill (a dispute as to whether Battersea LP should pay our intern the national minimum wage (NMW)), and if it helps the intern to get something on their CV and a start to a career. But to me this argument seems self-serving as it actually implies that we are not prepared to pay the real price of our politics or (if the intern works for Tesco) the real price of our groceries.

It also seems to me that the use of interns is massively against equal opportunities with only the affluent, OK the comfortably well-off, being able to fund their kids to go through internship. Indeed one of my Labour colleagues is very open about it and, I quote, says “from frustrating personal experience of trying to start a career in politics 10 years ago – these opportunities are by their nature exclusive to those who have parents wealthy enough to support them. I’m generally opposed to totally unpaid internships for this reason.”

Ben, for it was he, went on to say that “social work degrees, like other professional degree level qualifications (teaching), include a lot of practical experience through placements – that’s much of the point of the course. Would you expect NQTs to do free teaching placements too? Or people with nursing degrees? ….. The obvious question therefore is, are these really training posts – and in which case how do the positions differ from the placements that newly qualified social workers will have undertaken as part of their formal training? If not, then this looks like getting people to work for free”. To which I might add that I doubt whether too many bankers, civil engineers or military folk are expected to start their training on a volunteer basis, though I understand that the Met Police is going that way.

Another of my colleagues argued that the training Wandsworth was going to give was of high quality to which my reply is that I am sure that is so but that it is straight discrimination against the truly less well-off just like any free internship is.

My conclusion is that it is all part of the generational warfare that we of an older (and if you are over 40 maybe even 30 that includes you) generation look like starting having had our free education, a vast range of career choices, good pensions, the NHS, owner occupied housing and now refusing to pay our taxes for following generations. We will only have ourselves to blame if the young are revolting!

March 6, 2012  

My Latchmere March Newsletter (# 35)

February highlights

  1. The biggest news of the month, the year, the decade, was the Council’s decision to “spend” £100 million on Latchmere and Roehampton wards. And at the same time the Big Lottery has also allocated a separate £1 million to Latchmere. Let me explain. At the 29th February Finance and Corporate Resources Committee the Council came forward with its response to the riots. It was not, of course, said to be a response to the riots, indeed it was claimed to be despite the riots but nevertheless it seems to me to be quite a coincidence that one of the largest ever investments in the Council’s housing stock should come just 6 months after the riots and the independent paper the Council commissioned to analyse them.
  2. You can read the paper in detail at http://ww3.wandsworth.gov.uk/moderngov/documents/s23036/12-218%20-%20Aspirations.pdf but in summary the Council has decided to arrange its finances so that it creates the opportunity to borrow up to £100million on the refurbishment and regeneration of the most difficult estates in Latchmere and Roehampton. After discussing the paper with the Leader of the Council and the Chief Executive, it is clear that they expect about £60million to be spent in Latchmere and £40million in Roehampton. Whilst these are very large sums it should be remembered that the refurbishment of St. James Grove (Castlemaine) cost over £10million. Here it is before and after the refurbishment. There are as yet no specific plans, nor any commitment to timescales, but it is clear that the Council expects most of the investment to be centred on the York Road and Winstanley Estates. So using Castlemaine as a template, then if the same amount is spent on the large York Road blocks of Penge, Pennethorne, Chesterton, Inkster, Scholey and Holcroft and, say, Sporle Court, then there will not be much left for anything else. However, it is also clear that the Council want to do something substantial with the square at the foot of Pennethorne House and some of the open land around the other blocks.
  3. I did get a commitment from the Housing Director that the community, and your three councillors, will be very much involved in the process of developing plans and seeing through the process, which we all expect to take at least 10 years! So whilst I am sure things will start happening don’t let anyone imagine that it will all happen tomorrow because it won’t. By the way I was very involved in the consultation process at Castlemaine and it was pretty intensive and very successful.
  4. The same paper also expanded on the Big Lottery Trust’s decision to invest £1million over 10 years in community projects in the area covered by the York Road, Falcon Road, Kambala, Badric and Wayland Road estates. I have been in touch with the Big Lottery Trust and will meet with their contact in what they call confusingly the Clapham Junction/West Battersea area. The intention is that this fund should be used very much for community projects such as funding play schemes or youth clubs. I think that there will be a tremendous emphasis on well thought out, well led local projects and look forward to seeing what might come from, say, the Falconbrook parents or WOW (Women of Wandsworth) or the most active residents’ associations, such as Falcon Road. But it is also a great opportunity for York Road and Winstanley residents. We must all work to get the best outcome from this once in a lifetime opportunity!
  5. The Planning Applications Committee on 16th February had nothing of immediate significance to Latchmere ward but it did have a massive development in Nine Elms Lane, which had at least 1,500 flats let alone all the retail space, parking, and leisure space that goes along with that. You can read the details, if you really want to at http://ww3.wandsworth.gov.uk/moderngov/documents/s22864/Paper%20No.%2012-134A.pdf although there is not an easy summary of this massive (200 page) paper. But here is an artist’s (one might say developers’ propaganda representation) impression of the development. As it happens I voted against it not because I was against it in principle. Indeed on the whole I think that what is beginning to happen in Nine Elms is very exciting, but because there is almost no provision for housing at prices that ordinary people will be able to afford. In the jargon the element of affordable housing is only 15% and not as Wandsworth itself wants 33% – and that leaves aside whether what is called “affordable” is something that ordinary people can afford as it is often geared to people earning £50,000+.
  6. On a personal note, I went to the David Hockney exhibition at the Royal Academy on 7th February. If you can afford it and have any interest in art then let me thoroughly recommend it – a real gob-smacker. And here is one of the works, simply a scene of trees in North Yorkshire.
  7. And then on the 20th, I went to Oxford to hear Mary Jay give a talk on the diaries of Douglas Jay – who he? I hear you say. Well Douglas was the MP for what was then Battersea North from 1946-1983. As I have been a councillor since 1971, I knew him and, of course, Mary quite well.
  8. She is just in the process of getting his diaries published on the web. They are not, she says, strictly diaries but rather reminiscences of his time in the Harold Wilson Cabinet from 1964-67. I could write tons about it and him but suffice to say that Douglas was most famous for three things. First, his undying but unsuccessful opposition to British membership of what was then the Common Market, second, his successful opposition to the Motorway Box, which if it had proceeded would have left most of Battersea covered in a spaghetti junction of motorways. And third for being misquoted as saying, in the 1930s, that “the man in Whitehall knows best” – he actually said something rather different.
  9. The dinner after the lecture was fascinating as it included many of the major political figures of his day including Douglas’s son Peter and the BBC election guru David Butler, who for those of us of a certain age will remember doing TV coverage of elections for every year from 1959-2001 – he was credited with the invention of the swingometer!
  10. I also went to the “Ken Livingstone Manifesto” discussion on 11th but because I was doing a surgery at Battersea Library that same morning I missed most of it. But not as it happened Ken himself. I have heard Ken many times and he can veer from being pretty pedestrian to simply magnificent – who can forget his great speech after the 7/7 London bombings? Well this one wasn’t on that scale but it was pretty inspiring stuff and perhaps reflects his growing confidence about his chances at the Mayoral election on May 3rd. I am not saying that he looks exactly like a winner just yet but his position is much stronger than it was 6 months ago.

My Programme for March

  1. The Council meets on 7th March, when the Council Tax for next year will be rubber-stamped. If you don’t know, and I am sure that you do, it is frozen for the seventh year running, which given the impact of inflation over the years is equivalent to a 20% cut in Council Tax since 2005.
  2. The Falcon Road Residents Association AGM is on the 15th but I can’t make that because of the Planning Committee but I believe my ward colleague Simon Hogg will be there and maybe Wendy Speck later in the evening.
  3. There are two Planning Applications Committees this month on 5th March and 15th of which more next month..

What do you think?

  • At the beginning of this newsletter I said that the Big Lottery was going to spend £1million over 10 years on funding community facilities in the central part of Latchmere, that is the bit nearest Clapham Junction station. That works out at £100,000 each year. We need good ideas for what to do with it. We could for example argue that £10,000 should go on funding York Gardens Library or £5,000 on landscaping near Chesterton House. But what the Big Lottery Trust wants is our ideas. Do send me your thoughts and let’s make sure we make the best possible use of this £1million.